The definitions section is specific. The limit is two legs prior to the on duty break and two legs after the on duty break - no matter where in the AC you sit.
Vote YES and see what DW says. Dollars to donuts this will be a grievance, his position has always been DHD is "not flying"
Not correct. No pilot can be extended into a day off.
A reserve pilot whose assignment ends on a previously scheduled day off for reasons beyond the Company's control will be entitled to extension premium credits earned on such day, plus a five (5) hour pay credit for the first day below minimum days off.
if they cannot be extended, why have the language? As I stated in could happen. The operative word is "could". Don't make the BOLD statement it cannot happen. It can, and more than likely it will be an extension, it should NOT be anything else.
You still get home the same day
true, very true. as long as it is before midnight. Define home, is that your home or the domicile? With more than 50% of the pilots being commuters, the extension language does not help them if tagged out of domicile and held out of domicile. That is the issue. Do through flying to another hub/focus city and you are fair game for an extension that cannot be refused.
???? No one can be junior assigned more than 48 hours prior to the report time of the trip. Plus they can not junior assign into a single duty day with days off either side. Do the math. They can only tag you for an assignment immediately following a trip.
I will concede to that, (reading earlier language) The current book does not compel a pilot to a JA, the new language compels you. While this does protect the junior pilot with 11 days off or less, it hurts anyone senior that is not on a 30/7 bubble or near a vacation. The only plus is it appears no one will ever be JA's into a CDO
It has been four years and 3 months.
Actually, Wake and company started section 6 six months early as allowed. We started negotiations in December 2004. Thus, it is 4 years and almost 10 months, slightly closer to 5 years, but what is a couple of months anyway
The original team, Wake, Ball, Blizzard and one other I think. Then Pimpkin, and Bruckno when Ball and Wake stepped aside on or about May 2005. The next team started in late '06 and the current team in early '07.
Since most of these issues are Section 25, are you defending Section 25 as the best of the TA? I agree, there are some improvements...
Section 25 was TA'd on March '06, more than 3 years ago and this is the best it can be??
Then simply Vote YES for the TA.