zawillif
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2005
- Posts
- 602
details of the TA?
Yes. Where are the details of the TA? The whole thing not just bits and pieces? From what I'm hearing though sounds like it's a POS.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
details of the TA?
Yes. I have been ready.
It's certainly not earth shattering... and really not much of an improvement off of what was already there.
If I were still there, there would be nothing really enticing me to vote yes on it (other than finally having a contract and that big shiny W2 based signing bonus distrubution...blargh!)
Keep in mind the senior leadership- specifically one of the ones that was recalled- stated that "rigs are a bad thing." ...among many other gems.
The contract no matter what isn't going to be "bar raising"... you're fooling yourself if you expect that. However, I would have expected at least industry standard rigs, deadhead pay, and especially rsv workrules. The junior guys on reserve got tossed under the bus, run over, and then backed up again with this piece of work.
Good luck guys....here's an endsorsement for a big solid no.
Keep in mind the senior leadership- specifically one of the ones that was recalled- stated that "rigs are a bad thing." ...among many other gems.
Just curious..Did he give a reason for that belief?
Just curious..Did he give a reason for that belief?
the version I heard a while back was rigs meant the company can't give 4 days 28 hours trips or two 2 day trips worth 14.5 each. Rigs would require more time at work (less productive) and less time at home. The flip was while it may provide higher pay to the whole group, it would inhibit the pay of those who could hold those super productive trips.
Don't say anything like that on airlinkpilots, otherwise you'll get 3 pages of gushing about how our union volunteers walk on water and should be treated like gods...
I had a union negotiator in my recurrent class (end of March 09), he had been bought out of every single trip since Jan 2009. What were they doing during all that time?
Im very thankful of most of the volunteers at 9E. But now the sun is shining on the mem leadership and its all making sense to our current TA. This TA benefits all senior pilots in the company. No difference almost at all compared to the old contract. Im voting no and the bonus is a faking joke. These senior faks were capt and busting out 20 days off while the contract was amendable but yet fake or better yet snake gordon was throwing down the W2 method for the bonus. I knew he was out next to be recalled. He should be ashamed and the rest of the mem cronies.
That's what I was wondering....There is a case to be made for that...
when I was there, one captain was trying to convince me that block or better is a bad thing. He spent a leg from SDF-MSP trying to tell me that we made more money by NOT having block or better. I don't know about that, but at my new airline, I generally overblock about 4 hours a month. 5 minutes here, 5 minutes there, and it all adds up.
Vote no, Pinnacle pilots
I thought it was substandard before I read that crap. I will personally start the "PNCL sucks!" campaign if you guys vote that joke in.I've read a bit more of the contract... there are minimal improvements in the contract and many many concessions.
Reserves and junior people under the new contract will actually have a better life under the old contract, if you can even imagine.
All night highspeeds with unlimited legs, 2.7 hours per day for vacation pay instead of 3.75 hrs, being dropped back onto reserve after flying, 14 hour airport reserve... still 10 day off minimum.... who the crap wrote that piece of junk??
Oh.... and my personal favorite. It allows the over 60 guys to return at their previous seniority!
Absolutely unbelieveable. Vote no!