~~~^~~~
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2001
- Posts
- 6,137
Holding current assignment is "stirring the pot?"
You exemplify my concern with the NWA pilot group. I say I'd like to remain in my house and you write "not necessarily."
If DAL guys were on the board talking about taking NWA Captain positions that would be "stirring the pot," but they aren't. DAL guys are on the boards hoping that they can keep their base and equipment, they are worried about displacements and their hopes of status quo are answered with "not necessarily." I hope you can see the difference between agressive and defensive.
The bottom line is that the raises, better work rules and friendlier working environment are not appreciated, you want the Delta pilots' jobs too. If a Delta pilot is displaced as a result of my DAL's reduction that is one thing, if they are displaced by a DC9 pilot's planned reduction, that is quite another thing.
You can be assured that status quo holds the high ground in an arbitration.
I've got a F4 photo dropping Napalm if you would like to use it.
You exemplify my concern with the NWA pilot group. I say I'd like to remain in my house and you write "not necessarily."
If DAL guys were on the board talking about taking NWA Captain positions that would be "stirring the pot," but they aren't. DAL guys are on the boards hoping that they can keep their base and equipment, they are worried about displacements and their hopes of status quo are answered with "not necessarily." I hope you can see the difference between agressive and defensive.
The bottom line is that the raises, better work rules and friendlier working environment are not appreciated, you want the Delta pilots' jobs too. If a Delta pilot is displaced as a result of my DAL's reduction that is one thing, if they are displaced by a DC9 pilot's planned reduction, that is quite another thing.
You can be assured that status quo holds the high ground in an arbitration.
I've got a F4 photo dropping Napalm if you would like to use it.
Last edited: