shamrock
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2001
- Posts
- 1,786
The rationale given by our SAPA "reps" is that the EMB is not very profitable for the comany right now with all the weight restrictions.
And somehow that's the pilot's fault? Jeez.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The rationale given by our SAPA "reps" is that the EMB is not very profitable for the comany right now with all the weight restrictions.
Have our pay rates changed during the last 6 years? No? Then I call that stagnation. I didn't say our career expectations were stagnant. I didn't suggest our growth was stagnant. I only said our rates have been stagnant. United and Delta pay SkyWest more every year to keep up with inflation. Regardless of current aircraft-specific profitability, SkyWest pilots shouldn't suffer continually diminishing purchasing-power as inflation makes our outdated pay-scales provide less and less for our families. Nobody's asking for much. Extending the rumored 1% across the board to the 600 or so Brasilia pilots would make this proposal a slam dunk. (Or so I assume, since I have not yet read the proposal since nobody will PM me with it!!!)Come on Bluto...6 years of stagnation?
SKW slang for the EMB120 Brasilia.
Dude, Palomino, why don't you get off your high horse. (Get it!?it's not a 'Bro'. it's an EMB-120 Brasilia. period. drives me nuts that guys who have 20 hrs in the airplane call it a 'Bro'.
i've never heard the airplane called a 'Bro' and i flew it for 3 years. flightinfo.com is the first and last place i've ever heard it. i can only hope it doesn't find its way into the vernacular.
it's not a 'Bro'. it's an EMB-120 Brasilia. period. drives me nuts that guys who have 20 hrs in the airplane call it a 'Bro'.
i've never heard the airplane called a 'Bro' and i flew it for 3 years. flightinfo.com is the first and last place i've ever heard it. i can only hope it doesn't find its way into the vernacular.
Sorry to tell you Palomino, but it's the 'bro man. It must have been started by a Californian but it's what everyone at SKW knows the Brasilia as.
Splitting the pay for the 50 vs 70/90 should be enough to justify voting for it. It sucks for the EMB guy's but better to get split rates than a increase on an airplane that will only decrease in numbers as apposed to an airplane that will only grow in numbers.
Here are some rough numbers for Capt.
Years current + proposed over ride 700/900
5 $ 63.00 101% $ 63.63 105% $ 66.81
6 $ 65.00 - ------$ 65.65 ---------$ 68.93
7 $ 67.00 ---------$ 67.67 ---------$ 71.05
8 $ 69.00 ---------$ 69.69--------- $ 73.17
9 $ 71.00 ---------$ 71.71--------- $ 75.30
10 $ 74.00-------- $ 74.74 ---------$ 78.48
11 $ 76.00--------- $ 76.76-------- $ 80.60
12 $ 78.00 ---------$ 78.78 --------$ 82.72
13 $ 81.00 ---------$ 81.81 --------$ 85.90
14 $ 83.00 ---------$ 83.83 --------$ 88.02
15 $ 86.00--------- $ 86.86 --------$ 91.20
16 $ 88.00 ---------$ 88.88 --------$ 93.32
17 $ 91.00 ---------$ 91.91 --------$ 96.51
18 $ 93.00 ---------$ 93.93 --------$ 98.63
A check airman on SAPA told us it was basically this:
1% base increase to -200 rates
5% further increase for a -700/900 override
No increase for Bro pilots
No retro pay
Override is only paid for actual 700/900 flight time (a couple exceptions) and will only be paid IF you break daily AND monthly guarantee.
4 year "duration"
Oh, most pilots that have flown the "Brasilia" call it a Brasilia.
Those rates are pathetic
This whole profession has become pathetic.. but we're all still here, which is even more pathetic.
Then it's either not that pathetic compared to other jobs, or we are all idiots - which is it?
The latter.. (mind you I include myself in that grouping).
Seriously, whether it's the free market, union/non-union or what ever, in the end we're grossly underpaid. I've spent time working on the money side of aircraft recently and can tell you without a doubt that the pay equation of airplane operation isn't anywhere near the biggest factor.. it just happens to be the only one that can be squeezed easily, as airplanes can't be made cheaper, and fuel cost are difficult to control if at all.. We allow it to be this way, so we're to blame. When 747 and MD-11 pilots are being paid $35000/yr at the various 2nd tier carriers, how much can we expect to get paid flying a 30 pax E-120? The problem is from the top down, not so much from the bottom up.
I mean, how much have houses gone up in the past 5 years? Cars? Fuel? insurance rates?
Yet, 5 years ago pilots were on average making more than they are today, especially when inflation is factored in. 9/11 or not, there is a problem with how we're all doing this.