Majik
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2001
- Posts
- 320
I used to have the same view as yours until I came to work for NJA (my first union job). It only took me about a year to realize (from direct observation) that I was previously wrong in my assumptions.G4dude said:I just pulled it out of my butt, as you so eloquently put it. Years of studying economics and decades of observing union and non union shops, and the differences in how disputes are handled have convinced me that unions are the wrong answer to the right question, which is "how do we accomplish a better workplace?" The right answer being management's desire to avoid attrition and keep a motivated, productive workforce which will allow the company to change as the market changes. Unions just coerce and obstruct, and tend to feed into the most negative feelings of the biggest complainers, which tend to be the least productive employees anyway. Unions reward sloth and mediocrity, which means long term malaise and death to a company. See Delta and Pan Am and Eastern and...
Maybe if I become informed, instead of vaporing kneejerk opinions, I will become a union guy! If I do, you will be the first to know.![]()
In a past non-union job I've seen how disputes between a rogue manager and a good employee were handled. The rogue manager won and the good pilot was shown the door. I've seen a manager's friends get bereavement leave granted in excess of the minumum and I've seen those that were not in management's pockets have to jump through hoops and fight to get the minimum. In my non-union experience I've learned that those that suck up to management tend to skate through the rules and those that question management's decisions tend to get treated harshly.
Here's an example of a 15 pilot, non-union flight department I was with. John was 4th in seniority and was one of the best pilots in the group. John joined a Navy Reserve unit flying a G4. After the military drawdown John's unit needed him to fly more. The company told John that he needed to reduce his reserve time or they would terminate him. John showed them the congressional paperwork that prevented employers from terminating employees because of military reserve committments. A few weeks later John was told that the company had decided to reduce the number of pilots from 15 to 14 and, that to be fair, they had randomly drawn a name from a hat to see which pilot should be terminated. You guessed it - John just happened to be the unlucky pilot. He hired a lawyer and lost. He quickly landed a better job but it sucked for us to watch a good pilot get shafted.