Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Mesaba Hiring Pilots with Less than 600 and 50 with Chief Pilots Approval

  • Thread starter Thread starter SEVEN
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 22

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

SEVEN

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
Posts
1,563
http://www.jsfirm.com/companydetail.asp?jobid=13325

QUALIFICATIONS:The minimum preferred hours are 600 TT and 50 ME. Applicants having below the preferred hours are accepted with the approval of the company`s chief pilot. Each case is reviewed on an individual basis.· 600 Total Hours (Fixed Wing)· 50 Total Multi Engine Hours· High School Diploma (College preferred)· FAA Commercial Pilot Certificate (AMEL) with Instrument Rating· Current First Class Medical· Current Passport· FCC Radio Operators Permit· Vision Correctable to 20/20
 
Last edited:
Many regionals are hurting for pilots. In a pilot shortage environment, there are two ways to attract more pilots: increase wage or decrease minimums. Guess Mesaba choose the latter.
 
No, and from a strictly management standpoint, it wouldn't make sense to. Any time the bottom line ($) is hurt, the airline will do what it takes to avoid it. So lowering the minimums is what they all end up choosing.
 
^
|
|
|
|

Oh man, yikes, the above sounds something that Phildo would say. I think the Clown is starting to rub off on me! Gotta avoid that!
 
No, and from a strictly management standpoint, it wouldn't make sense to. Any time the bottom line ($) is hurt, the airline will do what it takes to avoid it. So lowering the minimums is what they all end up choosing.

But as usual, management is missing the forest for the trees. Lowering minimums is not the most economically logical way to go.

The increased training costs, (more sim sessions, more IOE, etc) will offset the cost advantage eventually. That coupled with a lack of captains ready for upgrade down the road because nobody will meet ICAO minimums for PIC for a long time.
 
No, and from a strictly management standpoint, it wouldn't make sense to. Any time the bottom line ($) is hurt, the airline will do what it takes to avoid it. So lowering the minimums is what they all end up choosing.
Anyone familiar with the insurures' viewpoints on this?? How low can they go before they jack up the rates to unaffordable/prohibitive levels (especially for cheap-a$$ regionals)??
 
Has any regional chosen the former path???????

i think ASA and CMR both wanted to increase first-year pay to second-year pay to attract pilots. the union said sure, if you increase everyone's pay equally...

i wouldn't be surprised if in a few years regionals were paying pilots wiith 0 hours to go to an ab initito program where they're taught the airline philosophy from day one. they'd have to give a few years to the airline in return for the investment.

still, a number of regionals have been offering bonuses to some pilots (say, with previous CRJ experience) upon completion of training.
 
regionals were paying pilots wiith 0 hours to go to an ab initito program where they're taught the airline philosophy from day one. they'd have to give a few years to the airline in return for the investment.

TWA and Pan Am both tried that in the '60s.
 
i think ASA and CMR both wanted to increase first-year pay to second-year pay to attract pilots. the union said sure, if you increase everyone's pay equally...

i wouldn't be surprised if in a few years regionals were paying pilots wiith 0 hours to go to an ab initito program where they're taught the airline philosophy from day one. they'd have to give a few years to the airline in return for the investment.

still, a number of regionals have been offering bonuses to some pilots (say, with previous CRJ experience) upon completion of training.

Rumor has it that Pinnacle recently (last few months?) hired a new FO for the CRJ. The FO checkride was to also act as this person's MEL Commercial check ride. Dunno if it's true, but it was a pretty good source I heard it from.
 
Rumor has it that Pinnacle recently (last few months?) hired a new FO for the CRJ. The FO checkride was to also act as this person's MEL Commercial check ride. Dunno if it's true, but it was a pretty good source I heard it from.

This is not true...has not happened at Pinnacle YET
 
Last year Doug Parker said that he wants to attract the best pilots for the lowest wage.
I guess he lied...
Now they hire the least qualified for the lowest price.

I guess as long as airplanes aren't falling out of the sky, all is well!
 
I guess as long as airplanes aren't falling out of the sky, all is well!

But eventually one will. And after the lawsuits and loss of business, how will management justify the decision? How can they even justify the risk now?

I'm very experienced, and was 100% single pilot in bad weather with a 300 hour wonder the other day. A new captain would have been in over his head.

Another short sighted band aid approach to an industry problem by airline management. What do they care... they won't have to live with the decision as they'll have moved on to trash some other company by then. We'll be the ones who have to live with it.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top