Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Mesaba Hiring Pilots with Less than 600 and 50 with Chief Pilots Approval

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

SEVEN

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
Posts
1,563
http://www.jsfirm.com/companydetail.asp?jobid=13325

QUALIFICATIONS:The minimum preferred hours are 600 TT and 50 ME. Applicants having below the preferred hours are accepted with the approval of the company`s chief pilot. Each case is reviewed on an individual basis.· 600 Total Hours (Fixed Wing)· 50 Total Multi Engine Hours· High School Diploma (College preferred)· FAA Commercial Pilot Certificate (AMEL) with Instrument Rating· Current First Class Medical· Current Passport· FCC Radio Operators Permit· Vision Correctable to 20/20
 
Last edited:
Many regionals are hurting for pilots. In a pilot shortage environment, there are two ways to attract more pilots: increase wage or decrease minimums. Guess Mesaba choose the latter.
 
No, and from a strictly management standpoint, it wouldn't make sense to. Any time the bottom line ($) is hurt, the airline will do what it takes to avoid it. So lowering the minimums is what they all end up choosing.
 
^
|
|
|
|

Oh man, yikes, the above sounds something that Phildo would say. I think the Clown is starting to rub off on me! Gotta avoid that!
 
No, and from a strictly management standpoint, it wouldn't make sense to. Any time the bottom line ($) is hurt, the airline will do what it takes to avoid it. So lowering the minimums is what they all end up choosing.

But as usual, management is missing the forest for the trees. Lowering minimums is not the most economically logical way to go.

The increased training costs, (more sim sessions, more IOE, etc) will offset the cost advantage eventually. That coupled with a lack of captains ready for upgrade down the road because nobody will meet ICAO minimums for PIC for a long time.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top