midlifeflyer
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2003
- Posts
- 2,086
- Base airport
- KTTA
This one is also covered by 91.9(a). If you fly in that cell, you'll definitely exceed the aircraft limitations.BornAgainPagan said:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This one is also covered by 91.9(a). If you fly in that cell, you'll definitely exceed the aircraft limitations.BornAgainPagan said:
Dangerkitty said:Someone isn't too happy with the contract that he agreed to.
EagleRJ said:The topic of the thread is things that are legal, but not safe. Taking a 3000TT new-hire and rushing him into the left seat of a jet, and making him fly with the very person whose job he took- is not safe.
EagleRJ said:Well, I wasn't here to agree to that scheme, nor did those who were here have a chance to agree or disagree to it. QUOTE]
In essence, you did agree to it when you accepted the job under the current agreement. The job was not forced on you.
BTW, not all flowbacks are 3000 wonder-pilots. Some of them have been around quite a while, some even with 121 PIC time!
X
Not fun.paulsalem said:Never done it before but you could take off 0-0 under IFR in Part 91
XTW said:In essence, you did agree to it when you accepted the job under the current agreement. The job was not forced on you.
BTW, not all flowbacks are 3000 wonder-pilots. So of them have been around quite a while, some even with 121 PIC time!
X