banned username 2
Banned User
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2001
- Posts
- 3,254
I don't see any trouble... KTEB - KOAK, KSFO alternate...fokkerjet said:Here's a comparison to help stir the pot a little:
TEB to OAK, SFO as an alternate. 325 lb payload (1 passenger plus luggage and crew luggage), optium routing and altitudes per JetPlan. Max fuel, except GV, I used 5000 lb landing fuel.
EMB - 5+37, 13429 burn and FL350, step 390 3+00 hrs into flight. M.78 cruise (max allowed in JetPlan), and 4387 lbs remaining at alternate. Max passenger load for this flight could be up to 10.
F2TH - 6+00, 9216 burn and FL430, step 470 3+15 hrs into flight. M75 cruise (in order to land with 2000 lbs), and 2265 lbs remaining at alternate. Max passenger load for this mission could be up to 4.
GV - 5+24, 14,480 burn and FL430, step to 470 1+00 hrs into flight. M83 cruise (standard cruise for us), and 5000 lbs remaining at alternate. The max passenger load for this flight could be up to 16 (really 19).
Looks like the Falcon could be in trouble here![]()
Falcon 50EX - 5+29, 11,732 burn and FL390, step 430 0+45 hrs into flight. M82 cruise and 3,150 lbs remaining at alternate. Max passenger load for this mission could be up to 9. (Could land with 3,800 lbs if departed full fuel)
Runway Required (15°C, no wind): 4,420 ft, 2nd Segment Climb OEI: 6.3%
Falcon 900EX - 5+27, 12,280 burn and FL390, step 430 3+00 hrs into flight. M82 cruise and 3,000 lbs remaining at alternate. Max passenger load for this mission could be up to 12 (well really 19). (Could land with 8,720 lbs if departed full fuel)
Runway Required (15°C, no wind): 3,990 ft, 2nd Segment Climb OEI: 9.3%
Last edited: