Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

is 40 to 45 too old to get hired at a major?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Ragman did-
As for you and yip..... The joke is lost
See waht a coolege dergees, in fcat a copule of tehm, can do you for you. Geos rihgt oevr yoru haed
 
I happen to be a check airman at a large regional carrier and am privileged to work with some of the best pilots in the business. We take new hires who often meet only the minimum requirements to be hired, have never flown a jet, never seen an FMS, never flown for an airline, never flown in congested airspace, etc. Heck, there was a time we even had some new hires who had never been in actual IMC conditions.We take them and turn them into safe, competent airline pilots.

The abilities required to do this and deal with the associated stress and high workload on the flight deck can only be understood by those who do it.

Not a single one of them has the job because they kiss ass. They have it because they are good at what they do. Period.

A lot of us we're check airman in our previous life-
So I hear and agree with what DcA is saying, there is an element of playing the political game- there's no doubt about that- (and I like to think I was decent at playing it) without a doubt though- check airman experience can be good, and can be bad- best pilots are the best pilots though and that doesn't always mean CA. Plenty of really good pilots haven't gone that route

So here's a secret from the hiring side.
If your check airman experience has made you a better junior FO candidate- expect it to help get you hired at a major.
If you CA experience makes you think you're special for performing in a role that thousands before you have done (dozens on this website with your same experience, no doubt), well... Expect an airline to pass on that kind of a headache.
Keep your head and your defensiveness of what a check airman/ standards captain is in check my man. The pride is in being one of us, not convincing yourself you walk on water and are entitled to special treatment in any majors hiring process.
 
I tried waiting it out and not get the degree. I changed my mind and now I'll be finished this summer with a quality BS from a great school. It's worth it and even if I don't get on with a major I'm glad I did it. I'm not just trying to check boxes but am genuinely interested in learning new things and it has been a great experience.

I now understand what the additional education adds to your knowledge base as well as gives you something to bring to the table when looking for another job.
 
I tried waiting it out and not get the degree. I changed my mind and now I'll be finished this summer with a quality BS from a great school. It's worth it and even if I don't get on with a major I'm glad I did it. I'm not just trying to check boxes but am genuinely interested in learning new things and it has been a great experience.

I now understand what the additional education adds to your knowledge base as well as gives you something to bring to the table when looking for another job.
Congrats, that is something to be proud of. But it has nothing to do with flying an airplane, and beauty of it is that SWA knowns it and does not base hiring decisions upon the checked box.
 
I know a degree has nothing to do with flying an airplane specifically, but knowledge and study leads to better thought-process and decision-making. I've experienced this and can say I'm better in the cockpit for the learning I've done. Even when some of the classes were not aviation related, they involved critical thinking skills, and that's a plus.

Not to mention, all the rationalization about college being unnecessary won't get you a job. Accepting the fact that airlines want it and getting it done, will.
 
Last edited:
And there you have it wms

I agree 100%

We all know a lot of pilots got the paper and didn't learn much- or resented the work-

My degree helped my flying and my ability to do my job every day.

He knows this, but I couldn't disagree with yip more.

Btw- just bc SWA doesn't "require" a degree doesn't mean it's not part of the computer program that selects applicants for interviews.
 
I know a degree has nothing to do with flying an airplane specifically, but knowledge and study leads to better thought-process and decision-making. I've experienced this and can say I'm better in the cockpit for the learning I've done. Even when some of the classes were not aviation related, they involved critical thinking skills, and that's a plus.

Not to mention, all the rationalization about college being unnecessary won't get you a job. Accepting the fact that airlines want it and getting it done, will.

Bingo-case closed.
 
USAirways, AA, and United don't require it, but you won't get through the filters without it.
 
Btw- just bc SWA doesn't "require" a degree doesn't mean it's not part of the computer program that selects applicants for interviews.

Yes and as per above, they get hired a SWA without it, and I bet they are just as good as the college degree guys.

Bingo-case closed.
You thunk?:laugh:
 
Last edited:
Yes and as per above, they get hired a SWA without it, and I bet they are just as good as the college degree guys.

You thunk?:laugh:

If what you're saying is true, they would be hired in much larger numbers than just 2-3/year.
 
If what you're saying is true, they would be hired in much larger numbers than just 2-3/year.
Not sure I agree with your numbers, but you might be right. Can someone confirm these? One of the last reports issued by Kit Darby in 2007, reported SWA hired about 7% non-degreed pilots. So if they hired 200 this year that would work out to about 14. I would also make a guess that that less than 7% of SWA's applicants are non-degreed, so it might even be an advantage to not have a degree.
 
That's some great logic there yip.
Brilliant.

93% have a degree and you argue that SWA wants you not to have one.
???

I "thunk" too- well said wms. Case closed.

And ps- I survey courses. Download iTunes university and lectures from YouTube.

Learning is learning and it's good for all of us to stay curious and sharp
 
That's some great logic there yip.
Brilliant.

93% have a degree and you argue that SWA wants you not to have one.

Not if you establish the estimation that probably 95% of the pilots looking for jobs have college degrees. That assumption would support the non-degreed pilot having an advantage at SWA. If someone has better numbers, please chime in.

As far as SWA not wanting you to have a degree is not the point. The point is SWA is smart enough to know it has no bearing on who the person is and upon their success in the cockpit.


Learning is learning and it's good for all of us to stay curious and sharp

Could not agree more, but learning takes place at many more places than college, but I guess that kind of learning doesn't carry much weight with many people. Well except some colleges that give credit for life experiences.

Lay off the juice bro.

Never is tastes too good, and sharing it with my ole squadron mates is what life is all about.
 
Last edited:
Sharing juice that tastes good?...with your squadron mates?... Is what life's about...??
Ok..,???
Miss the navy eh?
Freaky old man yip
 
As for the rest. You're making those numbers up, so how can it be argued.
We already gave you numbers -93% hired have degrees. Enough said.

There is intrinsic development as well. A degree doesn't guarantee it so I'm glad SWA considers some who have worked in themselves- but it will be something you'll have to explain- and unless you were developing yourself in some other worthwhile educational way- it's not going to be a good explanation--

Degrees don't fly airplanes- yip- but our job is more than just flying airplanes and I'd rather have educated next to me doing this job. Most non degree pilots I've flown with are a little rough around the edges for me. Not how I'd like us represented. Turns off the business travelers, don't interact well, don't manage and lead as well. They can fly. But so can monkeys. JMO and always exceptions
 
"Not if you establish the estimation that probably 95% of the pilots looking for jobs have college degrees. That assumption would support the non-degreed pilot having an advantage at SWA. If someone has better numbers, please chime in."

You do realize that the 5% are the top 5% of all non-degreed right? I really don't see how that gives the other 95% an advantage at any airline, including SW.

They will need to have some serious qualifications to be competitive. The days of the good ole buddy network are coming to an end. The online app services are taking care of that, and the decreased opportunities for lawsuits will keep them around.
 
Last edited:
I'm 51 with 10,000TT, 1200TPIC, 3k jet, 4k tprop, 3 types, and a 4 year degree. Experience at the regionals and currently flying for a large fractional(12 years).

Thinking about starting the application process, would I have a reasonable chance at getting on with a major?

I hope so but... there are a LOT of frac guys with their apps out. I just hope the airlines don't have the same bias against 91 flying they had 12 years ago.
I haven't heard of any that were unsuccessful at the majors.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top