Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The spelling nazi strikes again.... he can tell you how to spell a word but hasn't a clue as to who designs and approves an aircraft system. I fully realize who designs what. Who sets parameters, and who has the FINAL AUTHORITY AS TO THE OPERATION of the aircraft.
The manufacturer designs the product, writes the policies and procedures on how a system is to be used and the FAA approves/certifies that the product will perform as designed. Thankfully for all of us, the FAA doesn't design the product or specify how it will be used.
You really aren't very good at this, are you? Look in the mirror. I'm better than you.
And as I've stated.. the pilot has the final authority. But if you are applying incorrect standards, you are unsafe and deserve to be sanctioned by the courts before an accident happens or worse.
Bring the courts on. I'd welcome that battle, and when I win the case, I'll ram it down your throat everyday.
fischman, you can think you are better than me if you want.. that's fine.Look in the mirror. I'm better than you.
fischman, you can think you are better than me if you want.. that's fine.
However, every time you operate in either 91k or 135 you fly under words that I personally drafted.
There is NOTHING that I do in this industry now or in the future that will EVER be based on policy you set, but you can rest assured that policy I set will help to keep cowboys like you safe.
So, while you want to think you are better than me, you are free to do so. It's a free country and this country needs dreamers like you.
But …. my efforts always impact you when you fly and make it safer for you.
I'm free from your union and tyranny.
You shoulda been there fischman.. it was a heluva ride.
One case. One circumstance. Whoop-dee-doo.The problem is fischman, case history has already been established by Judge Bertelsman. You lose.
... However, every time you operate in either 91k or 135 you fly under words that I personally drafted...
...There is NOTHING that I do in this industry now or in the future that will EVER be based on policy you set, but you can rest assured that policy I set will help to keep cowboys like you safe...
...You shoulda been there fischman.. it was a heluva ride.
So Bagdad B19bob, I see your crusade to drive the infidels from the company property are growing more incompetent and desperate on a daily basis. Maybe just a coincidink buckeye checks your name against the eastern scab list and you don't post whilst on vacation abusing company assets. You, Michael, and Sonjay have done more to ruin flight options in your short tenure than anyone ever could have immagined. Management has repeatedly broken the regs. Crew shopping, (1)could not duplicate, (2)parking airplanes in hangers for three days without pulling a panel and signing off a C check, pushing pilots, threating pilots, intimidating pilots, playing russian roulette with the pilots, passengers, and aircraft with your little 500 am standby games. Where is the accountability for all these blunders? Who is paying for it? I'll tell you, the hard working pilots that built this company for you to tear down. A lot of good men and woman will lose their houses and disrupt their families because of your incompetence. I sure hope you enjoy your riches in this life because your just reward is coming in the next life.
He knows all he did was try to get the FAA to relax the Duty snd Rest rules... to favor management....
One case. One circumstance. Whoop-dee-doo.
You are so frickin' full of yourself, it's unbelieveable!
It was a fairly large committee who drafted those regs, and lots of people had a hand in it, myself included . . . along with all the fractionals, and several charter operators. Most of the discussion seemed to be whining like "it isn't fair that the 91K guys can do this, but us 135 have to do that". It was a major bitch session from the beginning to the end. Quit acting like you personally drafted any reg that keeps us safe. If you did actually have a hand in any of it, you know that the whole committee was more about the politics of 135 vs. 91K, than trying to keep anyone safe. Get off your friggin' high horse!
These are some pretty extreme claims.
First, what's wrong with CND? You assume it's to just clear the paperwork because mean-old management has is out for you and they pressure the mechanic into signing it. Wrong. I believe the mechanic puts his butt on the line when he signs the paperwork - these guys would not give into pressure from management to anything unsafe...even if it were true.
Second, your claim about a pencil-whipped C-check needs to be verified be facts. Have you spent time in the hangar monitoring what gets done to the aircraft while it's down for the check to make sure it gets done? Didn't think so. Do you even know what is involved in a C-check? Neither do I, but we trust that it has been done according to the logbook and proceed to get in and fly.
Stop whining fool.