GlorifiedCabbie
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2013
- Posts
- 1,220
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was an engine plug, but no matter. Certain pilots get held to a different standard than others. I wonder why?
So are you saying he should have been disciplined or even terminated for this event?
So are you saying he should have been disciplined or even terminated for this event?
TWA/Captain Queeg- the problem wasn't about sucking in the engine plug. The crew flew revenue legs prior to having the engine inspected. Everyone makes mistakes but when the cover-up failed to recognized the risk to passengers? LABEL me part of the cover-up.
TWA/Captain Queeg- the problem wasn't about sucking in the engine plug. The crew flew revenue legs prior to having the engine inspected. Everyone makes mistakes but when the cover-up failed to recognized the risk to passengers? LABEL me part of the cover-up.
Ok, here is the deal since TWA is trying to bait people down a road a little bit at a time, so he can then say something about the IBT, about the contract, about this or that, which is going to be something negative, and then he can try and say "see, I told you"
Yes by all accounts he should have been disciplined or fired for the actions that occurred and that were taken by him after what was initially a mistake.
Can the IBT or any Union force the company to bring some discipline or actually fire them for something that the company sweep under the rug, NO!
If the company is unwilling to act because for all we know this special guy had a picture of some higher company individual engage in certain Montana broke back mountain sheep activities or whatever it was they had done together, because he certainly has something.
He doesn't get terminated for something of that nature, yet someone else who has a few pictures on Facebook that are meaningless does get fired.
It's amazing how they choose to use their vague "Social Media" policy against a Union supporter/member/committee position holder, but do nothing for their special broke back Montana mountain boy.
Yes, the union can force the company to discipline or fire somebody. If someone fails to pay their dues, then the union will do those exact things, right?
In case you forgot, here is that section:
11.1(d) If, upon the expiration of the 15 day period, the pilot still remains delinquent, the Union shall certify in writing to the Vice President of Flight Operations with a copy to the pilot that the pilot has failed to remit payment within the grace period allowed and is therefore to be discharged. The Vice President of Flight Operations shall notify the pilot by certified mail, return receipt requested, that he is to be discharged.
Now even you know better than that. That is in no way related to provisions associated with "just cause." Reaching deep now, aren't we?
It must be getting harder and harder for you to find cons. Especially when you look back at the posts and see that you have failed to challenge the facts I provided that clarify your inaccuracies.
Must be running out of material over there...
I am just on here to oppose your obvious lies and fear grenades.
Oh yeah, don't forget to add 4 more names to your scab-like list as of today. A really large class starts in December so please leave more slots open.
BTW, the first 4 guys think it is hilarious that you call them scabs. They have started calling themselves scab 1,2,3,4, knowing how rediculous it is.
Here's a thought for you... The seniority lists will merge. And when they do, the Flight Options pilots in the LR45 fleet that were the most junior and couldn't get good schedules, vacations, etc. because of that low seniority number... Well, after the lists merge they may effectively revert to their placement with their old Flight Options Seniority number and date of hire. Instantly becoming more senior in that fleet.
Yes, the union can force the company to discipline or fire somebody. If someone fails to pay their dues, then the union will do those exact things, right?
In case you forgot, here is that section:
11.1(d) If, upon the expiration of the 15 day period, the pilot still remains delinquent, the Union shall certify in writing to the Vice President of Flight Operations with a copy to the pilot that the pilot has failed to remit payment within the grace period allowed and is therefore to be discharged. The Vice President of Flight Operations shall notify the pilot by certified mail, return receipt requested, that he is to be discharged.
So, from what you are saying it would be ok for the company to not discipline a proud Union supporrter, but not someone you don't like, hence the gay terms.
So much for together we stand.
You assume a merged list will be strictly DOH. Not much chance of the Union surviving if that's their goal. Having language that guarantees an integration method is one thing, but who's going to enforce that provision when the Union is decertified?
Without the CBA, Uncle gets to decide and we know how that worked. Certain pilots got special deals, others were stuck with leftovers. In his book, KR praises a 2 tier system. Agnd he has to let the Flex pilots believe they will be treated better than the FO pilots.
Yeah. Sorry about that. Uncle sometimes has these "visions". Just like the 5 stripe thing, he wants you guys to stand out and be the envy of the industry.
Exactly what I said you would do. Except for the fact that you are stretching things here.
Now let's talk about your hatred for Homosexuals Did you feel a need to bring this out on FlightInfo? If you have a problem with anybody who loves someone of their same sex, then just keep it to yourself? It is nobody's business on here.
but do nothing's for their special broke back Montana mountain boy.
Ok, let's look at who is stretching things here.
You call someone you wish wold have been fired by a name that refers to an openly gay movie. I call you on that.
You now say I have a hatred for homosexuals?
I know you guys want to discredit me because you don't agree with my views, but try to find something real as opposed to fabricating a hatred that I do not have.
This is pathetic, even for you.
The irony here is that your union would have been required to spend your Union dues to fight to get him his job back.
You assume a merged list will be strictly DOH. Not much chance of the Union surviving if that's their goal. Having language that guarantees an integration method is one thing, but who's going to enforce that provision when the Union is decertified?