Sky God...yes, I like that.
mar said:
Tell me, Sky God, which is a more perilous situation? An engine out on a DC6 or an engine out on a turbojet aircraft?
If you think it's six one way and half a dozen the other, then you too have a total loss of perspective.
Well, I guess that depends on if your turbo-jet is a B-52 or an F-16...talk about loss of perspective.
I'm starting to think that this topic is over your head. I didn't say that there is or isn't a bias, but I did try to explain why someone might prefer a pilot from a certain background.
Allow me to expand. The airlines don't want a pilot to feel(or be) in over his head when the $hit hits the fan in the company aircraft. If a pilot's only background is, say, small plane CFI, commuter slave, major pilot, then when his 737 loses an engine on the approach it might really be the scariest thing that has ever happened to him in his life...by far. Not so for someone who has been shot at while in an aircraft, or landed on the carrier at night, or taken an 8-ship into a grinder, or, yes, even flown the DC-6 into an IFR arrival through a gorge in Alaska...I guess I should add 'or been married'
Let's also clear up two common misconceptions:
1)The airlines are actually hiring you for your piloting skills...mostly false. Sure, you need to be good enough, but they are hiring you for your personality...both as it relates to being a good crew member and to being a good employee
2)The best way to prepare to be a 7x7 captain is to fly the 7x7 a lot...mostly false. Certainly knowlege and experience in the aircraft is a big help, but it is your varied experience that makes you a good captain and gives you the ability to adapt to the next situation that the sim checker had never thought of...(along with the personality that they look for above).
I think that most people can agree with this: a varied background makes for the best candidate. I hear that all the time from both civilian and military folks. Well, here's what I draw from that. Every pilot that is hired at company X will get the same experience in the next 10 years. So the 'varied' part must come before they get hired. If all they did was takeoff, cruise and land for the last 10 years, then they won't have a very varied background 10 years from now...see where I'm going...Now, if they did something out of the ordinary(see the 4 examples 3 paragraphs above) then in 10 years you've got a captain(or furloughee at USAir[sorry]) with quite a diverse flying history under his belt.
That right there is what I think makes the military pilot marketable to the civilian world. Let's face it, you can't dispute that they've dealt with some crazy $hiznit! Heck, the F-16 guy who still has one engine on the DC-10 is smokin' a Lucky on final...no big deal to him. Ok, kind of a big deal, but I think ya get the point.
Think of it as training to be an olympic miler. There is a whole lot more training than just running a mile. Weights, diet, psych preparation...stuff that isn't directly running, but sure helps when the whole package is put together...even the running is varied with sprints to long slow distance. Heck, the warmup jogs before the race add up to more than a mile...all to win the gold in a mile race.
If your issue is that you don't think you get the right amount of respect from the military guys, then I think you do have a complex. They might not know exactly what you did to get where you are, they might not even know what a DC-6 looks like, but they certainly appreciate that is wasn't an easy path to land the job. Again, excepting the 1% of them(and every other group in the world) that doesn't appreciate anything about anybody else.
mar said:
You know, it's like: "Should I wear my brown dress today or my purple dress."
Cute...now go get your fukcin' shine box!!