Falcon 50ex

[Kingairrick]

Many also seem to agree with the opinion that the Falcon is not the answer to everyone's mission. (Think of how obvious that statement is. NO airplane is the answer to everyone's mission.)

This guy was asking for alternatives to the 50EX and a previous poster suggested the Legacy. Obviously I am not the only one who thinks that the Legacy is a viable/superior option to the Dassault.

We can agree to disagree on this one. I think the Legacy rocks. That's no secret. You don't. That's okay by me. But don't pretend the 50EX is the greatest airplane ever built because it is FAR *FAR* from it. For my money both airplanes are compromises, but the EMB compromises are the ones that make my job easier and my passengers more comfortable.

The Legacy isn't the fastest, the highest flying, or the biggest, but it is a remarkable blend of extremely good qualities. It is a pilot's airplane and my experience is the people in the back who pay for it love it. Obviously not everyone can be happy with an airplane and the Legacy is no exception. But again, in my experience it is overwhelmingly popular with crews, pax, mx, management, and ownership.

See? Was that so hard?:beer:

 

[CRJCA]

Heh Legacydriver! I believe kingairrick asked for some data to support your Legacy claims. Not that I doubt you, but some hard data to back up your claims would be nice. And how is it you get this "data"? Hmmmmmm. Just wondering.

Signed,

FalconDriver

 

[LegacyDriver]

Heh Legacydriver! I believe kingairrick asked for some data to support your Legacy claims. Not that I doubt you, but some hard data to back up your claims would be nice. And how is it you get this "data"? Hmmmmmm. Just wondering.

Signed,

FalconDriver

Your timing is impeccable. I jut got off the phone with my bud at Embraer Executive Jets. I forgot to ask him if I can post his name (if he gives me permission of course I will). I worked with him for years and I trust him completely. He does not lie. He is one of the top jet salesmen in the country and has sold jets for another top corporate jet manufacturer before coming to Embraer.

That said...

Kingairrick (KAR) made an assertion about a Legacy in his hangar that has failed to dispatch on average two times a month. I asked my contact to research all the serial numbers that could possibly be attributed to the story KAR posted (S/Ns 1014-1034). My contact found *ZERO* matches that came back with KAR's assertion, nor did anything even CLOSE come up. Further, if such a hangar queen existed in the Embraer fleet my contact would know about it, as would all of his clients (his phone would be ringing off the hook).

He further provided the Legacy's dispatch reliability rate which stands at 99.967% -- the HIGHEST dispatch reliability in the world. PERIOD.

Embraer's market share in the Super Midsize Category has moved from 11% to 15% in the last three years and is now roughly equal to Dassault.

Also on the noise issue... The noise technologies that I referred to in a prior post as being on the way have actually arrived. Without giving you dB numbers (I have them but I cannot give them out) the Legacy is quieter in the cabin than the Challenger 300, an airplane that is known to be pretty peaceful inside.

Once again, people are spouting off at the mouth about things they know nothing about. Yes, the early Legacy jets were loud. Yes they were heavy. Yes they didn't have range or payload. But as I have asserted from the beginning... Every single Legacy built has been better than the one that preceded it in some form or fashion.

We are seeing the results in terms of range, performance, noise reduction, and interior improvements. The first four were pretty lousy and we all know that. The Legacy 600 is a far cry from those jets.

Back to you.

 

[LegacyDriver]

:beer:

:beer:

 

[CRJCA]

Blah blah blah. You sound like the teacher from the charlie brown series.

 

[CRJCA]

Nicely done LegacyDriver. Im sold. Of course I was already sold. Falcon nice plane. Too small though as previously noted. Its nice to hear some solid facts though given fact that its hard to sort through bull here sometimes. Also, itll help the gentleman that started this firestorm in first place.

 

[Floyd94]

Blah blah blah. You sound like the teacher from the charlie brown series.

The dude must make commision off selling the damn things.

I'll give him this the systems are eaiser... so much so a monkey could run the thing. However, I'd be interested in comparing the takeoff performance and 2nd segment climb numbers against a 50ex. My money is with the 50EX's.

 

[LegacyDriver]

The dude must make commision off selling the damn things.

LOL. No commissions I assure you.

I'll give him this the systems are eaiser... so much so a monkey could run the thing.

I agree completely. Systems wise the Legacy is genius.

However, I'd be interested in comparing the takeoff performance and 2nd segment climb numbers against a 50ex. My money is with the 50EX's.

There's no question in my mind the 50EX will do better on takeoff performance and second segment climb. It *IS* a tri-jet after all. However, you pay for that performance with a smaller cabin and less redundancy in the systems department. (At MTOW the Legacy outweighs the Falcon 50EX by nearly 10,000 pounds.)

That said, the MTOW BFL is only about 350' more for the EMB than for the 50EX. It's just not that big a factor--and if it is then the Legacy isn't the airplane for you.

 

[Hugh Johnson]

What's the ETOPS on the Legacy?
Why do I need to use the APU inflight?

And I'm sorry to the Challenger guys, but our boss didn't like seeing them upside down at the end of the runway in winter. Leading edge devices rule.

50EX to small, 900B.

 

[LegacyDriver]

What's the ETOPS on the Legacy?

Hell if I know. Not my area of expertise. They go across the pond regularly (NY to London City, etc. and back). I went to Hawaii in it (and loved it)--never had a problem. 3400NM and engines that are proven reliable through more than 10 Million fleet hours... (The E-190 just got approval for 75 minutes ETOPS and the AE-3007 engines on the Legacy are at *LEAST* as reliable as those on the 190.)

Why do I need to use the APU inflight?

REDUNDANCY.

Oh yea of no exposure (so many corporate guys just don't understand)... An APU can do a lot of things for you (except in a Falcon). In the Embraer it can power the entire electrical system, pressurize the aircraft, and run the hydraulics. It is also available to start an engine if you cannot for some reason do a crossbleed or windmilling airstart.

My favorite thing to do with the APU on the EMB is to power the pressurization system with it on takeoff and landing. On takeoff it results in lower ITTs which reduces engine wear. On both takeoff *and* landing it provides a perfectly stable air supply to the cabin. Thus no matter what I do with the thrust levers the people in the back won't notice. (Trust me they notice on a Falcon 50EX!!!!!!)

And I'm sorry to the Challenger guys, but our boss didn't like seeing them upside down at the end of the runway in winter. Leading edge devices rule.

Yeah, especially when they deploy asymmetrically at FL390 (Falcon 900) or won't go out of autoslat mode and get you stuck on the ground in KBNA for three days (Falcon 50EX - Rumrunnr!!!). HA HA HA!

50EX to small, 900B.

900B? Same problems as the 50EX has. Poor crosswind performer, sucky tiller, ad nauseum. It's just fatter and costs a lot more.