Full of LUV
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2002
- Posts
- 1,021
Management is right, Good goes around
WOW! I know of two furloughed Delta pilots who claimed the never "refused to fly" 50-70 seat aircraft.
I think you might be referring to the fact that as RJ's were just rolling out, ALPA wouldn't have condoned flying the aircraft for regional wages and by the time ALPA national figured out that the RJ wasn't just to replace the props, but also half of the mainline, the cat was out of the bag and all ALPA could do was negotiate some scope clauses just to put a lid on the explosion of regional jets that REPLACED mainline.
Nobody refused to fly anything, people were just willing to fly for a cheaper price, and still are, and just as water finds the lowest spot, companies will find the lowest costs, it just takes more time for some companies than others.
Oh and BTW, my buds also say that it was COMAIR who refused to hire furloughed (replaced) mainline for the few who really needed a job without giving up that last shred of hope for a recall, not CHQ, not ASA, not SKW.
Huh, management has one thing right, I guess Good does go around.
bvt1151 said:You are correct.
Chautauqua pilots have been granted flying that would have prevented furloughs at Comair immediately after their contract. This raises a very large flag.
A distinction needs to be made between Comair/Delta and CHQ/Delta. Delta refused to fly 50-70 seat aircraft, which is why Comair saw them. Delta furloughed in the larger aircraft, but the Delta pilots refused the aircraft that would have saved their furloughs. Comair pilots have never refused an airframe, but have watched as pilot groups under bid them for the same aircraft. This after a sacrificing three months for a contract that was to help the entire industry. What have CHQ, and now Mesa done? They pat Comair pilots on the back, say nice job...and then yoink, thanks for the flying we'd never have gotten the chance to take from you had you not gone on strike. I'm not entirely convinced that the term "struck flying" should cease to represent routes after the strike ends.
Chautauqua's contract is crap, but I understand how they got duped into signing it (republic). What is inexcusible is actively going after flying that is being conducted by an airline that struck to receive the contract to fly it. While other airlines refused to fly Comair routes during the strike, Chautauqua waited until the strike was over, and then took 'em. I've heard way too many CHQ pilots in the terminal bragging about their quick upgrades, and considering what other pilot groups have sacrificed (and are continuing to sacrifice greatly) for them to sneak in and reap the benefits, I don't blame the looks and lectures they get.
Brag about your upgrade all you want, but I'd be careful. One of these people you're bragging to may be about to lose his job because he trusted you to do what it took for the good of the profession, not for the good of your ego.
WOW! I know of two furloughed Delta pilots who claimed the never "refused to fly" 50-70 seat aircraft.
I think you might be referring to the fact that as RJ's were just rolling out, ALPA wouldn't have condoned flying the aircraft for regional wages and by the time ALPA national figured out that the RJ wasn't just to replace the props, but also half of the mainline, the cat was out of the bag and all ALPA could do was negotiate some scope clauses just to put a lid on the explosion of regional jets that REPLACED mainline.
Nobody refused to fly anything, people were just willing to fly for a cheaper price, and still are, and just as water finds the lowest spot, companies will find the lowest costs, it just takes more time for some companies than others.
Oh and BTW, my buds also say that it was COMAIR who refused to hire furloughed (replaced) mainline for the few who really needed a job without giving up that last shred of hope for a recall, not CHQ, not ASA, not SKW.
Huh, management has one thing right, I guess Good does go around.