Quit quoting some anynomus CAL pilot.
Quit quoting some anynomus CAL pilot. -USCPILOT
The question is really this. Is the pilot reliable or not?
My answer is yes. Why?
1. He flew through the clouds.
2. He had instruments to gage it.
3. He flies to Grand Rapids often.
4. He has no reason to lie unless he "saw me comin"!
5. He is not a chemical engineer, nuclear physisist, or other intelligent person I have named already. He is a PILOT. One of your kind
If he is reliable, then there is no reason to disbelieve him.
Then we can assume that the trails in those photos
http://www.geocities.com/houstonchemtrails/Thanksgiving03a.html
are not at 30,000ft plus where normal jet contrails form. Therefore there is validity in what I've said.
I'm surprised that you don't believe him.
Believe it or not, you can get altitude data on the web. Since Michigan is a very cloudy state most of the year, its the perfect region to monitor chemtrails. Once you establish low altitude clouds, you have a reference point for altitiude. Once you snap a picture, you have electonic evidence. Once you go to the daily news, you can get temperature and humidity.
This really isn't very complex. This is plain scientific observation and documentation.
What is the real problem? The facts.
The facts don't bear out what you are saying. Thats why you keep looking for more.
I'm surprised one of you pilots doesn't take a note pad and evaluate the facts. You have more access to altitude, temperature and humidity than I do. All I have is the web, a camera, pilots testamonys when I can get them, a federal document listing chemtrials, a public declaration from Kucinich that they exist, thousands of electronic photos, air and water sample tests posted on the web ect.
That's all I have.
I can ignore it,
Turn a blind eye to it,
Not question pilots about it,
Not discuss it with concerned citizens,
Discount pilots testamonys,
Ignore books written about it
Look down at the ground and not at the sky.
Call my photos normal looking.
But you'd have to a rock or a bump on a log.