Holiday trails re-examined
http://www.geocities.com/houstonchemtrails/Houston21.html
http://www.geocities.com/houstonchemtrails/Houston22.html
What’s wrong with those pictures? Are we just recording everyday occurrences or are these photos showing something else?
To answer that question we need to know what the formula for jet contrails is?
Jet contrails form when you have:
1. High altitudes (that’s were low temperatures are found. Typically at 30,000ft plus)
2. Low temperatures (beginning at -40 )
3. High humidity (mega humidity 80 to 100 percent not just a drop or two)
What was the temperature at the time of the pictures? 66 degrees.
At what altitude would you see a jet contrail begin to form if the ground temp is 66 degrees? Take 3.5F (temp difference per thousand feet) times 30 equals 105 (temp difference) Then subtract 66 from 105 equals -39F (NASA and NOAA says you need -40 so were very close). Therefore, the altitude required for jet contrails to form if its 66 degrees on the ground is 30,000ft. Does that fit the conditions for jet contrails? Yes
What was the humidity that day? 27 percent
Denver, why don’t you think you’re seeing normal jet contrails in Houston21 and Houston22?
1. Climate: The climate was too hot and the humidity is too low that day. (hard to believe isn't it! Houston is not located at the North Pole. Its located near the same latitude as Tampa or St Pete Flordia.)
2. Consistency: The climate has been consistently hot and dry for days. How can we go day after day, week after week with no jet contrails and then get hit with up to 9 jets leaving low lying, long lasting trails over our neighborhoods. Even the police are baffled about it!
3. Aerial photography hardware with 18X optical zoom would be hard pressed to photograph jets at 30,000ft. Its like trying to photograph your house at cruising altitudes with a cheap Kmart camera. Yet we can photograph and video tape these planes and trails with a degree of clarity every time. That’s a sign that they are traveling at lower altitudes then what you’d expect for jet contrails.
4. The trails are massive. Jet contrails at 30,000ft plus should look pencil thin, not massive. Also, they shouldn’t appear as gigantic rainbows over a community. Moreover, when was the last time, a normal jet contrail looked like someone took an eraser to the photograph?
5. The trails are lasting too long. Mark Steadman did a study of over 60 jet contrails in Houston. His results were that the vast majority of jet contrails lasted under a minute. Long lasting jet contrails according to NASA need initial temperatures of -70 degrees to sustain them for long periods of time. Houston’s climate is not conducive for that. Its simply too hot. (You can easily do time lapse photography on these jet trails and show consistently that they are lasting toooo long. The vast majority of jet contrails evaporate so fast, you wouldn’t even NOTICE THEM!
6. Although we had no cloud cover that day, cloud cover is becoming a critical component in the chemtrail argument. Once we call the airport to get the cloud ceiling, we then have an altitude reference point. If jets spray under the cloud ceiling at X altitude, we can then ask, does it fit the formula for jet contrails? If the ceiling is obviously too low, then we have to question what we are seeing.
For example, the cloud ceiling for Grand Rapids, MI on November 24th was 2,000ft as reported by a Continental pilot (the pilot who piloted the jet I arrived on). Outside the airport were massive jet contrails. Can jet contrails be sustained at 2,000ft? NO, unless you’re in Antarctica. From what I’m seeing at the Unisys Weather web site, it appears common for Houston to have 2,000ft cloud ceilings as well. What are we seeing if jet contrails don’t form at 2,000ft? A chemical trail. A big, fat, purposefully created white chemical trail.
Chemical trails don’t need 30,000ft to form.
Chemical trails don’t need 90 percent humidity to form.
Chemical trails don’t need cold temperatures to form.
Just ask presidential hopeful Dennis Kucinch (author of HR2977), Representative Bob Graham (Project SHAD), Representative Jim Thompson (Project SHAD) and Representative Marty Sabo (covert spraying in Minnesota).