Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Awa Merger

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Cactus73 said:
PHXFLYR,

Maybe I came off the wrong way here, but this thread has turned into a furloughee battle ground.

I didn't make the above up. The above change in language concerned the AWA communications chair enough to make a statement about it. Reps I have talked to also noticed the change and believe that they may want to include these guys as active pilots - not furloughees. This change in language also concerned a pilot enough to ask Doug Parker about it at Wednesday's brown bag. Parker is very clear when it comes to furloughed vs. active status.

I didn't really do much homework, but I didn't just post this out of thin air either.

I would take what our illustrious Communication Chair says with a grain of salt.I
believe what they MAY be concerned about is the pilots at MidAtlantic Airlines that ARE NOT furloughed USAir pilots coming over in the event this merger should be approved. Those pilots never had a senority number at USAir and if the USAir MEC is trying to "Get THEM On Board" to paraphrase a familiar saying,then that is just plane wrong. But then again, it IS the USAir MEC we are talking about,is it not.....????

PHXFLYR:cool:
 
Crzipilot said:
Blah, Blah blah....ya furlough battle ground. Whatever... Obviously the Jr. at AWA are pulling at straws, as the furlough number was adjusted to reflected those which have reached age 60/resigned/or deceased. I belive the original number was 1876. And the mention of the 400 or so, is the number of individuals that have taken a j4j position. Which was basically a flow back, in which most of us are flying and shown as ACTIVE on the AAA certificate, or flying for a wholly owned, which agreed to the J4J program, which created a CEL list consisting of all the WO pilots which now have the ability to flow UPWARDS to mainline. Ohhh wait..let me guess....the AWA want to cut all of them off to take advantage of the 1600-1900 retirements in the next 10 yrs or so??????
Yeah right... The furloughees deserve their position, as do the CEL pilots. These two groups are the ones that have paid the most out of this deal.


Crzipilot;

Again, by this post you show all who have the poor misfourtune of reading your
nonsense that you truly live up to your name. I agree wholeheartedly with you that the furloughees from Mainline currently flying at MDA or a J4J carrier deserve a place on the combined the senority list provided THEY DID NOT RESIGN THEIR USAIR SENIORITY NUMBER. Where on that list will be determined by an arbitrator ,which I find disappointing, but hey ,it is what it is. But to come out and say that the MDA pilots on the CEL list deserve a spot on the combined seniority list?? UH-UH..... NO WAY !!!! Those guys and gals NEVER HAD A USAIR SENORITY NUMBER A DAY IN THEIR LIFE. You know that as well as I do. And if you and your buddies are trying to push for that, rest assured that we on our end will push our MEC to make sure that that idea will never see the light of day . Before you start flaming away,keep in mind that I am a former 10 year employee at one of the CEL carriers and have many fine friends that have taken "advantage" of flowing thru to MDA...NOT mainline like you claim. Anyway, I think I had enough of all you web board experts for now. We now return to our originally scheduled program.....:)


PHXFLYR:cool:
 
Last edited:
dually said:
Many FOs are 20 years plus for QOL.
I was just trying to get the facts out there and did
not intend to upset anybody. I know its a very stressful period.
I have no horse in this race, resigned long ago.
Best of luck to all of you.


You are a wise man, Kemosabee !! :)


PHXFLYR:cool:
 
PHXFLYR said:
At the expense of how many Senior Mesa RJ F/O's........?


PHXFLYR:cool:

Yeah whatever.... I won't argue this since 1. it's Mesa and not worth the effort. 2. If you can't do the math with the J4J program and added airframes versus upgrades that would never happen anyway. Well it would not benefit either of us.

Besides the original point was to compare AWA's "way of doing things" with Mesa's.

RF
 
PHXFLYR said:
I agree wholeheartedly with you that the furloughees from Mainline currently flying at MDA or a J4J carrier deserve a place on the combined the senority list provided THEY DID NOT RESIGN THEIR USAIR SENIORITY NUMBER.


Hey, cool......we agree. A few weeks ago you guys were saying I deserved nothing. Now, I deserve a spot. Thanks.


PHXFLYR said:
But to come out and say that the MDA pilots on the CEL list deserve a spot on the combined seniority list?? UH-UH..... NO WAY !!!! Those guys and gals NEVER HAD A USAIR SENORITY NUMBER A DAY IN THEIR LIFE.


Darn it. I wish you hadn't said that, because I really don't want to throw gas on your fire and all, but, in reality (the real one) those guys did get USAir seniority numbers in the deal. They are junior to all the J4J's, but they do have numbers. It's funny how, on this board, often, when someone posts something in all caps, it really is something they only think they are really, really sure of.


PHXFLYR said:
You know that as well as I do.


No....sorry PHXFLYR, apparently you know it better than everyone else who actually knows what's really transpired and what a mess it really is. I'm not happy about any of it, really, but it is kind of funny watching all the mis-information fly around, what with all the lord-almighty conviction in everyone's cyber-voices. Funny....haha....


PHXFLYR said:
Before you start flaming away,keep in mind that I am a former 10 year employee at one of the CEL carriers


Ah. Well that expalins a lot.

PHXFLYR said:
Anyway, I think I had enough of all you web board experts for now. We now return to our originally scheduled program.....:)

Me too. And hey, with facts and "expertise" such as your's blathered here daily, you've done quite enough. Take a well deserved rest, Sir......:)
 
Wow!

Don't you guys see the big picture? Of course Doug Parker said that his interpretation was furloughed is furloughed-it's to his advantage and inherently not to yours in most cases. Doug and the boys are dying to sell MDA to Republic. Personally I think the reason it wasn't announced with the deal itself is because this is easily the most important and explosive labor issue going forward. You guys are pissing all over yourselves about the rights or non-rights of MDA pilots which only a ruling by ALPA national or an arbitrator can ultimately decide instead of focusing on getting those birds on the property. With B6 about to launch an EMB-190 armada later this year, the new mantra will be that everyone has to have those aircraft. While you guys are throwing seniority rocks at each other, the 170's and the 190's will have left the barn along with alot more 737's and jobs. Parker just hopes pilots on both sides are too dumb to notice, and so far so good. Also it seems to me that too many HP pilots view this deal as solely a AAA issue. It's much bigger than that. The 170's/190's will spread west just like Parker's plans to move some of YV's CR9's to the east and more 737's may be toast. Even some of the older 320's with the old -A1 engines might be gone too as their desired capacity can be maintained with EMB's and CR9's. With no big new deliveries planned until '09 it could get alot uglier-and you can forget about a fence protecting you from all of this. I sincerely doubt any arbitrator is going to put up an operational fence of the magnitude desired by many. Equipment and initial bid restrictions for sure, but it's not going to be run like two separate companies behind some Great Wall of China fence just to appease DOH on one side and percieved advantage on the other.

P.S. From Jan.05 to Dec. 06 the combined airlines fleet of 737's will drop from 150 to 87 with only 4 additions(319's/320's) to the narrowbody fleet. Care to wager how many more 737's fall off the fleet and how quickly once the 190's come? At least you can look forward to reading articles about the 'synergies' achieved from having basically two fleets: 319/320/321/330 and 757/767.
 
Last edited:
Marko,

Fantastic, big-picture post. What labor should be doing right now is trying to get as many people on the mainline property as possible, from both sides, and not quibbling about who gets to be based in PHX or who gets to fly here at all. The immaturity of all that will kill many of our careers.

So here we are, wrapped up in Seniority Squalor, while the real windfall is going to CHQ.

stuipd!
 
Marko,

Excellent post!

I think we are well aware of the 90 seat growth explosion going on. Every day it seems we announce a new destination or flight and it's with a 86 seat 900 flown by MESA.

I think we should fight for all this flying to be put under our control with guys on the combined seniority list. Unfortunately, we have little control over this.

This is a huge issue.
 
BeCareful! said:
Hey, cool......we agree. A few weeks ago you guys were saying I deserved nothing. Now, I deserve a spot. Thanks.





Darn it. I wish you hadn't said that, because I really don't want to throw gas on your fire and all, but, in reality (the real one) those guys did get USAir seniority numbers in the deal. They are junior to all the J4J's, but they do have numbers. It's funny how, on this board, often, when someone posts something in all caps, it really is something they only think they are really, really sure of.





No....sorry PHXFLYR, apparently you know it better than everyone else who actually knows what's really transpired and what a mess it really is. I'm not happy about any of it, really, but it is kind of funny watching all the mis-information fly around, what with all the lord-almighty conviction in everyone's cyber-voices. Funny....haha....





Ah. Well that expalins a lot.



Me too. And hey, with facts and "expertise" such as your's blathered here daily, you've done quite enough. Take a well deserved rest, Sir......:)



And 321 Bus driver wonders why I think so highly of the USAir folks. Oh well.......


PHXFLYR:cool:
 
Last edited:
Filkster said:
Yeah whatever.... I won't argue this since 1. it's Mesa and not worth the effort.

Mesa and not worth the effort....don't hold back ...tell us how you really feel
Gotta love that PHL attitude:rolleyes:

2. If you can't do the math with the J4J program and added airframes versus upgrades that would never happen anyway.

Oh, really clairevoient one ..can you give me the numbers for the next Powerball Lottery ,then?


PHXFLYR:cool:
 
OOPs3

UAL78, you stole my post for sure. Whats funny is that I don't even have an axe to grind about this and neither do you. Deep down I guess its none of my business if the US AW horde ties down the poor AWA pilots and beats them with a club. But I do care.

Its funny that you are making this personal. Why do you assume that anyone wants to work at UAL? Your company is a whos who list of incompetent CEO's and abject inept leadership.

Your only chance is to have a group buy out your company and forcibly remove the management group lock stock and barrel. Short of that, you've got some professionals who would have trouble guiding a lemonade stand to profitability, even with free lemons.

Why you would be so delusional as to believe anyone would want to be there now is beyond me. Not the envy of the industry but the joke. You're there because you're too old to go anywhere else. They took your retirement, much of your pay, ESOP Chernobyled, and they're not done yet. You're along for the ride my friend. I see no reason for you to have a pompous attitude. None at all.



++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Post hijacked for my reply to this "gentleman"

Hello, my hot-headed friend. It's UAL78, one of the jokes of FlightInfo.com. It's said that perception is reality. It must be quite a world through your eyes. I wonder which of the low-lifes that I permanently banned that you've morphed into? I ban posters who cross the line of propriety or simply can't disagree without being disagreeable. I don't ban people who believe they speak the truth unless it becomes potentially legally perilous to the owner of the Board or for the two reasons discussed above.

So I'll let your rant and perception of me stand. I really couldn't care less what you think of me or my airline. Judging by your demeanor and your philosophy, you're simply not worth the time or effort.

By the way, what were the dates of your two UAL interviews where you were turned down? Now, run along and don't forget to add some O2 to the mix. It sounds like you're in serious need of some professional help.

Post away, junior- just abide by the rules.

UAL78[/QUOTE]
 
PHXFLYR said:
And 321 Bus driver wonders why I think so highly of the USAir folks. Oh well.......


PHXFLYR:cool:



Prior to your edit, your post had a little more bite. Why pull the punch? Tell us how you really feel.

10 years at a USAir WO? Dude, I'd be even more belligerent than you are! That must have sucked!

Keep up the good work!

And, as always: Happy Windfall!
 
nitrogen said:
I ban posters who cross the line of propriety or simply can't disagree without being disagreeable.

The moderators let you ban yourself? That is just weird.
 
BeCareful! said:
Keep up the good work!

And, as always: Happy Windfall!

BeCareful!,

The smart-ass Happy Windfall! comment is what pisses me off about you.

The AWA pilot's don't want and don't expect a windfall. We want a proportional integration using ALPA merger policy as a guide.

It seems that a windfall to you is any agreement that doesn't return furloughed pilots back to the line using DOH/ratio integration.

This probably will not happen and it will not be a windfall for the AWA pilots.

As marko stated above, we are all so tunnel visioned right now that the 90 seaters will take over all of our flying as you are worrying about recall position and I'm trying to keep my job.

Except for the Doug Parker ass that posts on this board, please name one AWA pilot that is looking for a windfall?

I'm all ears!
 
Cactus73 said:
Except for the Doug Parker ass that posts on this board, please name one AWA pilot that is looking for a windfall?

I'm all ears!


Cactus -

Any and all of you that have repeated the "Your career expectations are ZERO" mantra, that's who.

Beyond that, it's not even worth explaining. You should know, what with your years of experience in this industry, that for you to be placed infront of over 1500 pilots, all of whom were hired at US Airways (the new name for your airline) before you, will be quite a piece of good fortune for you. Furthermore, and most importantly, when our substantial retirements pull you to the left seat, in front of all those pilots (who were hired before you), your paycheck will reflect yet another bit of great luck.

As I fully expect this is your goal and a realistic assesment of your future, I'll say it again: Happy Windfall!
 
Crzipilot said:
And the mention of the 400 or so, is the number of individuals that have taken a j4j position. Which was basically a flow back, in which most of us are flying and shown as ACTIVE on the AAA certificate,


If you are shown as active then why are you flying a J4J position or "flow back" position? Guess what, they did this at CAL/COex and you know what those guys that "flowed back" were furloughed. Period! Let's face it. If you guys were not furloughed then you would not be at these J4J jobs etc.

So to help me understand, are you saying that you are listed as "Active" on your certificate or your seniority list at US Airways? One seems vitally more important than the other...
 
Quote by Be Careful:

"Beyond that, it's not even worth explaining. You should know, what with your years of experience in this industry, that for you to be placed infront of over 1500 pilots, all of whom were hired at US Airways (the new name for your airline) before you, will be quite a piece of good fortune for you."

Sir, you should know that without AWA those furloughs, along with the active USA pilots, would most likely have lost their jobs. You should look at it this way: AWA making this move is "quite a piece of good fortune for you"!

You can thank AWA later when all the dust has settled.
 
Joey Bagodonutz said:
I find it interesting that none of the usair pilots seem to realize that without this merger they are ALL out of work.

...or who the "Merger-er" and "Merger-ee" is.
 
Fly-n-hi said:
You can thank AWA later when all the dust has settled.
We need to be careful about making smug comments like that. We fly airplanes and we have nothing to do with the business decisions of our employers, thus no thank-yous should be directed nor accepted here.
If you haven't guessed it I've heard the sanctimonious "you should be thankful to us" bullcrap before and it made my blood boil. Let's please not hear it again!
 
Joey Bagodonutz said:
I find it interesting that none of the usair pilots seem to realize that without this merger they are ALL out of work.


Again, the US pilots have been hearing this for ohhhhh about the past 15 years. Your going out of bussines, your time is short, etc etc. The demise of US has been speculated for years. Amazing, it's been going and going. At the same time AWA own leader has stated, that by the end of the year AWA would have a liquidity problem and possible Chp11. And who knows, it may have been talk, it may not of. People must remember the leaders start talking in the press what they want the press and such to believe. If you remember correctly back in 2001 our own esteemed leader said that US would fold up and be gone if UAL merger wasn't approved. Shortly after that it was, US with it's transformation will be a strong stand alone carrier.
Don't expect any thanks with the attitudes being show here. This transaction is a combination. This transaction has been said to be needed by both parties.
there hasn't been any talks from the US side that any AWA pilot should hit the street. The only talk has been pointing the fact that there will be ALOT of retirements on our side with ALOT of movement upwards. US is currently running 200-400 pilots short. Again all the US pilots are saying is, Let US reap the rewards of what WE are bringing into the combination. Basically the retirements of our guys.
There could easily be an integration system wide, with fences between east and west, with a seperate integration in the east / west division. Problem with this??? The pilots themselves. as has been shown (the majority of the problem within this industry) is the "I have mine attitude" As prev. poster said, while we argue who gets which carrot, the regionals are getting the biggest carrot with the 90 seaters. The regionals are more than happy to fly the 90 seaters and continue to get more flying, larger airplanes at rates way below what a 737/ dc9 driver should be paid. Everyone turns around and blames ALPA. Well hate to say it but the pilots themselves are ALPA. So look in the mirror for someone to blame. It is sickening to continue to see the pervasive attitude of I got mine throughout the industry. I've heard guys talk about, "There needs to be something done" a national work stoppage etc etc, but then asked how did you get to the right seat of a jet with 800 hours, it's well I paid $30k for some advanced training at an airline, and then I agreed to fly this jet for $20.00/hr. Well why did you accept that. I need the experience, I'll do what it takes to get to the larger airlines. And i"m upset because now I sit here with 1200 hours, promised to upgrade in 6 months to a year, and this place sucks. The nature of the industy has sickeningly changed, and the entitlement attitudes suck. BUT that's also a nature of what society of where we live in has changed too. The answer to change this is above my pay grade, and it isn't a slam against the regional guys, as if you refused the job, there'd be 20 more behind you that would fly it for half the cost. It's a slam against Everyone. Guess this turned into a rant, but guess I have been flying with too many new F/O's that have exhibited this attitude, and yet don't know the history of the industry.
Anyways the bottom line is, all the US guys have been talking is for this thing to be done within ALPA merger policy. (no windfalls, career expectations relative seniority etc etc) Which hmmmm....would include taking into account all the retirements that are to occur, Why should the bottom 5% AWA pilot gain from this, and get zoomed up the seniority list? a bottom 5% US pilot has been hanging on looking at, in 10 years I'll go up to the top 5%. That's ALOT of movement. Where would the bottom 5% AWA be in 10 years within his seniority list? in the top 5% or somewhere in the middle 50%??? So why don't we look at integrating consistent on where you would be on the seniority list in 5, 10, 15, 20 years? Speculate all you want where US would be in 5-10 years, as well as speculate where AWA would be. YOU DON"T KNOW. and have NOTHING to base your conjectures off of besides quotes from guys that are standing to make millions if this deal goes through.

As for Xanderman, Well MDA is NOT a j4j position. It's a division of mainline. They are shown as active pilots by alpa. They pay AAA dues/assesments/ vote on AAA dealings and can even run for AAA alpa positions. Name one furloughee that is allowed to do that. Ask the FAA if the pilots flying for MDA are AAA pilots or furloughed pilots.

PHXFLYER.....uhmmmm......I feelt he pain you flew 10 years at a WO'd, As to you saying *ELL no to the CEL list, well why?? the CEL list is there, it was promised these guys could flow up, and they should still be able to after the merger. What would you have against these guys flowing up??? No where have I mentioned them being integrated or slotted or DOH, just that the program needs to be kept in place. Alot of those guys are in the mid 20's and in 10 years may still be there, and would prob. welcome the fact of being able to flow up to the mainline. Why wouldn't you offer them such a chance? Again the "I got mine" attitude prevails...
 
TWA Dude said:
We need to be careful about making smug comments like that. We fly airplanes and we have nothing to do with the business decisions of our employers, thus no thank-yous should be directed nor accepted here.
If you haven't guessed it I've heard the sanctimonious "you should be thankful to us" bullcrap before and it made my blood boil. Let's please not hear it again!

Read my post more carefully. I specifically did not say thank the AWA pilots because I realize that we have no say in this aquisition. I said thank AWA (actually, I am a share holder). But the truth is if this prolongs the careers of USA pilots then they better be thankful down the road. And really, to be honest, I don't care if they say thanks or not. I just want them to realize that without this deal they are toast. The only ones that say otherwise are the USA pilots.

Funny how a year ago the USA pilots that I personally spoke to were predicting the end of USA within a year or two and now, all of a sudden, they have these high career expextations like Junior FO's being in the top 5% of the seniority list in 10 years.

P.S. You're talking to the son of a TWA pilot...so I know how it is. This is one of the reasons I am involving myself and being vocal.

Quote by crzipilot: "So why don't we look at integrating consistent on where you would be on the seniority list in 5, 10, 15, 20 years? Speculate all you want where US would be in 5-10 years, as well as speculate where AWA would be. YOU DON"T KNOW. and have NOTHING to base your conjectures off of besides quotes from guys that are standing to make millions if this deal goes through."

You just answered your own question. I don't know where you or I will be in 5, 10, or 15 years. That's why I am only concerned with today. That argument is insane (or Crzi).

Actually, I forsee AWA pilots quitting by the boatload for no reason and myself being number 1 on the list in 10 years so let's use your 10 or 15 year logic based on that. I also belive that we AWA will by 200 new airplanes in which case I will become much more senior so let's integrate based on that.

You might say that "I will move up the ranks because of retirements and attrition" True, you might. But you don't know what USA's fleet plans will be in 10 or 15 years. If 400 guys retire but yo also get rid of 40 airplanes that won't help you much, will it? (BTW...this senario is what we have been hearing)

Bottom line is you don't know about the future, you only know right now.
 
Hard to take you seriously Joey. With your vast amount of experience, you may want to consider posting on the kiddie board.
Joey Bagodonutz said:
I find it interesting that none of the usair pilots seem to realize that without this merger they are ALL out of work.
 
Crzipilot said:
As for Xanderman, Well MDA is NOT a j4j position. It's a division of mainline. They are shown as active pilots by alpa. They pay AAA dues/assesments/ vote on AAA dealings and can even run for AAA alpa positions. Name one furloughee that is allowed to do that. Ask the FAA if the pilots flying for MDA are AAA pilots or furloughed pilots.

So tell me why I had 2 FURLOUGHED US Air guys in my class at AWA claiming they came straight from MDA? Was MDA planned before things went south at U? Was this a strategic move planned long ago to phase out your dependence on regional airlines? I guess I'm not so much trying to argue as much as I am trying to understand this logic. To me it does not matter who is eligible for this or that in your MEC/LEC. And again at CAL/COex we initially had 1 MEC that included both CAL and COex pilots (Because we were a wholly owned "division" of Continental Airlines). That did not change the fact that the FURLOUGHED CAL pilots at COex were still FURLOUGHED. As far as being shown as "active" it depends on whose list we are talking about here. So I suppose my real question in all of this nonsense is this: Do you have a published list for MDA that is SEPERATE from U?
Andy
 
Fly-n-hi said:
Sir, you should know that without AWA those furloughs, along with the active USA pilots, would most likely have lost their jobs. You should look at it this way: AWA making this move is "quite a piece of good fortune for you"!
.

Fly-n-hi -

Crzipilot's post addressed this already, but lemme just ask: when was it that USA pilots were supposed to lose their jobs? Was it this year? Next year? Back in the early 1990's? Shortly after the United merger went away? Before BK#1? Before BK#2? Or was it going to be early-to-mid-late-early next fall, after the slow period?

How you claim to possess this knowledge is beyond me. You and almost every other AWA pilot here seem to possess this "knowledge," and ever since Bronner and Lakefield found these investors and decided Parker should run the show (since they want to play golf), you and your co-workers have been on here telling us all how USAir was about to go out of business. Wolf said it; so what? Siegel said it; so what? Gangwal said it; so what? You think these guys are above saying something they want regulators to believe? Man, that's pretty naive.

Investors were lining up even before AWA was part of the picture. U's restructuring has been pretty extensive, and we're a heck of a lot further along that path than some other notable Legacy Carriers.

So, when you have some facts on the much-speculated fate of USAir, let us all know. Until then, you sound about as credible as USA Today; they've been telling everyone that USAir is washed up for years.

 
BeCareful! said:
Fly-n-hi -

Crzipilot's post addressed this already, but lemme just ask: when was it that USA pilots were supposed to lose their jobs? Was it this year? Next year? Back in the early 1990's? Shortly after the United merger went away? Before BK#1? Before BK#2? Or was it going to be early-to-mid-late-early next fall, after the slow period?

How you claim to possess this knowledge is beyond me. You and almost every other AWA pilot here seem to possess this "knowledge," and ever since Bronner and Lakefield found these investors and decided Parker should run the show (since they want to play golf), you and your co-workers have been on here telling us all how USAir was about to go out of business. Wolf said it; so what? Siegel said it; so what? Gangwal said it; so what? You think these guys are above saying something they want regulators to believe? Man, that's pretty naive.

Investors were lining up even before AWA was part of the picture. U's restructuring has been pretty extensive, and we're a heck of a lot further along that path than some other notable Legacy Carriers.

So, when you have some facts on the much-speculated fate of USAir, let us all know. Until then, you sound about as credible as USA Today; they've been telling everyone that USAir is washed up for years.

This whole arguement is a moot point, just how many of you J4J guys are JR to more senior AAA guys that are furloughed?? Furloughed is furloughed J4J or not, should you then be allowed to jump ahead of the more senior AAA pilots who chose not to fly in the J4J program?? I do believe that the furloughed pilots should be brought back to the NEWCO but to the bottom not DOH as many of you infer. That should not be a strange place for you as you were on the bottom before you were furloughed were you not???

WD.
 
WD

I had just over 600 pilots junior to me at US Airways, so, no, being at the bottom of the list was never a familiar place for me.

Why does that matter again?

According to you and others every furloughed USAir pilot's expectations were ZERO, so let's not even discuss it.

As always, Happy Win...d...fa....

Oh yeah. Sorry. I forgot you don't like to be reminded about how good things are going to be for you when the U retirements kick in and turbo-boost your seniority.

How about: Happy Father's Day!
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom