Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

APA Pilots polled. No to age 60.

  • Thread starter Thread starter AAflyer
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 24

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Tejas: The result of the CAL heart attacks proved the system works...THE CURRENT SYSTEM! It also illustrates that it is perhaps strained. Hard for you to grasp because you're looking no further than your own interests.

Why don't YOU wright a "honest" letter to somebody? Tell the them you have NOT lost a pension, have NOT been furloughed, and although tens of thousands of pilots have retired before you, and tens of thousands will retire after you...YOU are more uniqely deservant than anybody else of a windfall! Tell them your so f-ing special they ought to feel lucky they represent you!
 
People talk about the windfall that will go to the 50ish pilots when age 60 changes(and it will change) well what about the windfall that came to the pilots who moved up quickly when all of the over 60 pilots were summarily retired when age 60 took effect. I predict that 5 yrs after the change people will wonder what all the fuss was about. Lastly--all of you who haven't upgraded yet and complain about your upgrade being delayed--well when you signed on did they give you a date--was it scheduled when you were first hired? As for APA, I'd just like to see how their reps can say its about safety and caring for the travelling public with a straight face--they must be world class liars like Bill Clinton-its about the money, nothing more nothing less. Let AA keep age 60--after all it was their boy CR Smith that gave it to us in the first place, only fitting.

Airfogey
 
People talk about the windfall that will go to the 50ish pilots when age 60 changes(and it will change) well what about the windfall that came to the pilots who moved up quickly when all of the over 60 pilots were summarily retired when age 60 took effect. I predict that 5 yrs after the change people will wonder what all the fuss was about. Lastly--all of you who haven't upgraded yet and complain about your upgrade being delayed--well when you signed on did they give you a date--was it scheduled when you were first hired? As for APA, I'd just like to see how their reps can say its about safety and caring for the travelling public with a straight face--they must be world class liars like Bill Clinton-its about the money, nothing more nothing less. Let AA keep age 60--after all it was their boy CR Smith that gave it to us in the first place, only fitting.

Airfogey

How would you feel, if the day the rule changes, if it does at all, all the pilots who retire in the last five were able to come back and push you back five years; maybe, even to the right seat. Would you think that's fair? off course you do. After all, it is not about money, so what if yo go back to make senior FO pay vs captain, I guess you wouldn't mind. Some of us do.

Nobody promised us an upgrade date, they just told us that the law of the land for the past 30+ years states that everybody must retire at 60, so you do the math. Now, they want to change the rules in the middle of the game.

Any change to age 60 rule should take at least 5 years to take effect. That's only fair. Nobody should benefit from the rule, or, be affected by it.
 
Last edited:
People talk about the windfall that will go to the 50ish pilots when age 60 changes(and it will change) well what about the windfall that came to the pilots who moved up quickly when all of the over 60 pilots were summarily retired when age 60 took effect. I predict that 5 yrs after the change people will wonder what all the fuss was about. Lastly--all of you who haven't upgraded yet and complain about your upgrade being delayed--well when you signed on did they give you a date--was it scheduled when you were first hired? As for APA, I'd just like to see how their reps can say its about safety and caring for the travelling public with a straight face--they must be world class liars like Bill Clinton-its about the money, nothing more nothing less. Let AA keep age 60--after all it was their boy CR Smith that gave it to us in the first place, only fitting.

Airfogey

I am not really thrilled about Age60 changing.. I've been taking hits, like all of us, since 9/11. I don't want to wait another five years to get hired by a career company....

With that said, there are bigger problems than age 60. Namely globalization/liberalization and our own divisiveness over the issues... including age60.

ALPA isn't against age60...they just know they can't hold back the tide and they are working on building a workable system to deal with the water..... the tide is coming...how you deal with it says alot...

The APA guys can afford to rattle thier sabre's (no pun) cause it is all bark..there is no bite....


Give me an APA PAC address?

APA needs a membership drive. APA has a golden opportunity.

If you want to give money to the APA's PAC it is acalled CAPA-PAC. They are in with IPA, SWAPA, NPA and IBT... They are smart enough not to address issues that ALPA-PAC address or at least counter them... so give your money to CAPA-PAC but it won't adress age60.

Maybe the APA can get skywest pilots and go from there... Heack..maybe the APA can get all of ALPA.... It doesn't matter what we are called just as long as we are all under one name...

Here is waht CAPA-PAC address...

CAPA is presently focused on a number of key concerns facing the airline industry and the millions who depend on its safe daily operation. In the post-9/11 world, airport security has become a critical aspect of national defense, and CAPA advocates a number of security improvements to include:
  • Careful screening of all airport employees, including contracted workers, before they enter secure areas. Screening would include a combination of security background checks, random physical screening (wand, pat-down, visual inspections and electronic portals), and biometric ID for passage into the SIDA area.
  • Biometric Identification cards for all law enforcement, government workers such as FAA inspectors, all part 121 passenger and cargo pilots, aircraft mechanics and cabin crewmembers who have access to the flight deck.
  • Inspections of cargo on the bottom side for all cargo carriers vs. screening based on dependence of the known shipper program.
  • Immediate sharing of updated security directives and potential threats directly with the cargo and passenger pilots in command (the Captain), who play a critical role in aircraft security.
  • Strengthening the Federal Flight Deck Officer program (FFDO), which trains and monitors pilots who carry firearms in the event of a hijacking or terrorist incident.
  • Security measures to address the threat of shoulder-mounted rockets (MANPADS) that pose a grave danger to commercial air traffic.
  • Increased airport surveillance and airport perimeter security.
  • Flight time duty time issues to include; 1) length of crew duty day, 2) reserve rest periods for International crewmembers, 3) new flight time limitations based on circadian rhythms, limited flight hours based on compensatory rest before next duty sequence.
  • Closer examination of cosmic radiation exposures and health affects of a long term career exposure to high altitude radiation.
  • Pension protections for the career aviator.
  • No Flight Deck imaging recorders…CAPA supports preventative measures for aircraft safety verses reactionary spending programs that secure the future of government agencies.
  • No changes to the existing airman medical certificates.

And that is one of the issues... you don't know how to even begin to effect change properly.... I applaud your education, but imagine if you were politically savvy in in defending your political career..... you wouldn't be complaining that things weren't getting done, you'd be telling guys how to get it done....
 
Tejas: The result of the CAL heart attacks proved the system works...THE CURRENT SYSTEM! It also illustrates that it is perhaps strained.--->Maybe flying was just too much for those individuals. What kind of airplanes were they flying when this happened? If a pilot is feeling "strained" maybe he/she should quit/retire. I don't feel "strained" at all. I really have fun when I'm out flying...maybe thats the secret....enjoy what you do...or find something else.Hard for you to grasp because you're looking no further than your own interests.--->....and the interests of like-minded pilots.

Why don't YOU wright a "honest" letter to somebody?---->I already have. My 2 Senators and my Congressman are already firmly in favor of this age change. No need for anymore letters. Tell the them you have NOT lost a pension, have NOT been furloughed, --->They really don't care about that...we both know all they are going to do is contact the FAA if they need some additional information on this age issue..and although tens of thousands of pilots have retired before you, and tens of thousands will retire after you...YOU are more uniqely deservant than anybody else of a windfall! Tell them your so f-ing special they ought to feel lucky they represent you!--->Duuuude, relax....we aren't going to settle this on FI.com It's an FAA thing...it's an ICAO thing. The horse was let out of the barn when the ICAO and the US went along with letting this happen. You can't turn back the clock. The NPRM is coming soon....Then the rule will change....I just hope you are in a left seat by then ( see, I do care about you.)[/quote
 
Last edited:
Tejas and fogey... you say it's safe. At your own airline, 3 separate incidents this year of pilots having heart attacks. Luckily they were in cruise flight. Imagine it being captain's leg on a visual approach and he croaks on short final and slumps over the controls.

Unfortunately, it'll take one of those and metal getting bent for the FAA to wake up and see that this is indeed about safety first and foremost.
 
Tejas and fogey... you say it's safe. At your own airline, 3 separate incidents this year of pilots having heart attacks.--->Didn't happen at "my house." It was somebody else. Luckily they were in cruise flight. Imagine it being captain's leg on a visual approach and he croaks on short final and slumps over the controls.

Unfortunately, it'll take one of those and metal getting bent for the FAA to wake up and see that this is indeed about safety first and foremost.--->Well...theres lots of guys over age 60 doing all kinds of flying....crop dusting...CFI's ...corporate....test flying....There should be a wealth of data on this sort of thing. Methinks that theres not an epidemic on this[/quote]

Tejas
 
If you want to give money to the APA's PAC it is acalled CAPA-PAC. They are in with IPA, SWAPA, NPA and IBT...

I say more donations from ALPA guys to the APA's PAC...it would really be appreciated by all of us here at SWA.

Or was all that talk about donating to APA's PAC a few days ago nothing but FI bluster?

Tejas
 
Tejas, glad your not going to be a captain for an additional five years. You must be afraid to upgrade.

With SWA promoting a fly till you die law and CAL promoting a new EU/US cabotage treaty the profession is disappearing everyday.
 
Last edited:
Tejas, glad your not going to be a captain for an additional five years. You must be afraid to upgrade.

With SWA promoting a fly till you die law and CAL promoting a new EU/US cabotage treaty the profession is disappearing everyday.

Well then...I would guess it's time for you to leave if it's getting that bad.

And...it's only fly till you die if you die before age 65....if you don't ...then it's not.
 
Call me cynical, but the age 60 rule is all about dollars and has nothing to do with safety. If the big money donors (ie, corporate types from the airlines) want the rule changed to age 65, then it will happen. I have no doubt that FDX, UPS, SWA, DL, UA, AA et al have looked at the bottom line and determined what would cost them the least and then went with it. Hired a few lobbyists, made a few political donations to the right politicos, done deal. Looks like raising the age to 65 is cheaper for them in the long run. As far as ALPA, the silence is easily explained - dues. 64 year old MD-11 Captain with 20 years on property at 1.9% dues a year or 34 year old F/O with 3 years on property at 1.9%? They'll get five more years of dues from the guys who've maxed out the pay scale. ALPA will side with the money, not the membership on this one.
 
As far as ALPA, the silence is easily explained - dues. 64 year old MD-11 Captain with 20 years on property at 1.9% dues a year or 34 year old F/O with 3 years on property at 1.9%? They'll get five more years of dues from the guys who've maxed out the pay scale. ALPA will side with the money, not the membership on this one.

So America is for sale? And ALPA values the difference between the senior captain and the junior fo.

I would tend to agree with your assessment, however I hope its not the case. Because if it is ALPA is worthless and completely fails to stand up for the entire reason of its existence. ALPA is not about its bank accounts, ALPA is about pilots careers.

And after the last five years, its does appear ALPA is more concerned with itself than those it represents.
 
Well then...I would guess it's time for you to leave if it's getting that bad.

And...it's only fly till you die if you die before age 65....if you don't ...then it's not.

Tejas, I curious. How did you transition from a C195 to a B737? With 14,000 hours listed you have way to much time to be from the military.

If you are from the commuters or night frieght you must realize what life is like outside the little SWA bubble you live in today. And if you were from the type of flying 95% of us do you must know how bad life can be. Yet your current world view is that everyone has it just like SWA and therefore flying till 65 is desirable. So you are either very ignorant, stubborn, or selfish.

I would guess selfish with a complete disregard for anyone besides yourself. You tell your MESA buddies they have to work another five years because you want another five years.

If I did not get any of the above right I did nail your selfishness.
 
Last edited:
ALPA's going to get their 1.96% from the same amount of people regardless of any age change. Personally I would not mind if every retiree between 60-65 that wanted to come back did. ALPA had 12000 members in 1978 and over 60000 today--most growth has come from expansion and more people flying. The industry has always been feast or famine--look at the history. Carriers hired off the street and taught people to fly in the mid 60's, there was virtually no growth and stagnation from 70-77. Many of the "legacy" carriers got unsustainable contracts during the late 90's, unfortuantely many of the pilots laid off from these carriers after 9-11 shouldn't have been there in the first place if theyhad had productive contracts prior to 9-11. Fortunately or unfortunately the SWA model is the future of aviation--I just wish that my carrier(not CAL by the way) would leave ALPA and get a union that represents our interests.

Airfogey

ps I'm quite a few years from 60 myself btw
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom