AAflyer
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 1,493
Swapa was polled just recently and those in favor of changing the age won the vote...I can't remember what the % was. I voted no.
Good to know.
Thanks,
AA
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Swapa was polled just recently and those in favor of changing the age won the vote...I can't remember what the % was. I voted no.
Which sorta begs the question: "How many cylinders was ALPA hitting on when FDX got their new contract?"
I like what the APA is doing. I think ALPA should do the same thing, and told my reps exactly that at our last LEC meeting.
Swapa was polled just recently and those in favor of changing the age won the vote...I can't remember what the % was. I voted no.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
January 30, 2007
SWAPA President, Capt. Carl Kuwitzky, said he is looking forward to the end of the Age 60 Rule and will work with Federal Aviation Administration officials to expedite the rule making process.
“I am pleased at the direction the FAA is going and we are looking forward to working with them on the Aviation Rulemaking Committee,” Capt. Kuwitzky said.
Capt. Kuwitzky joined Southwest Company officials in expressing their support for the Jan. 30 announcement from FAA Administrator Marion Blakey about the FAA move to adopt the new international standard for age 65. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) on Nov. 23, 2006 adopted a standard allowing one pilot to be age 60-65 so long as the other pilot is under age 60. The “over/under” age 65 rule has applied for foreign pilots coming into the U.S. since that time. Administrator Blakey said at the National Press Club luncheon that she is working on “global harmonization” and allowing U.S. pilots to have the same rules as foreign pilots is “the right thing to do.”
How many pilots where at the LEC meeting that were not committee members or elected officers? And what percentage is that of your LEC?
Also, what did your LEC reps say about ALPA not going along with the wishes of the membership on the Age60 issue?
About 100-110 in attendance. Looked to be about a dozen "office holders" there. There are about 2,000 in Council 1 of ALPA.
5% is average. Is it effective or even representative?
1. Our "point man" on the issue for NWA pilots had just passed away the day before the LEC meeting, following an accident in his home. He was our EVP, Captain Darryl Snider. A good man. His untimely death is a huge loss for NWA pilots and ALPA.
I heard. My regards. A true loss.....
2. The wishes of the NWA MEC had not changed, which is to support the conintinuation of Age 60.
Copy that...
3. A resolution calling for an ALPA-wide effort to oppose the NPRM was before the MEC.
politcal action.... good stuff
4. Members were encouraged to contact their legislators on the issue.
even better.... how many do you think actually will?
I would have rather taken my chances with the ALPA Merger Policy and binding arbitration. However, this may be the most illustrative example of how the APA will fight for its members while ALPA (National) acts in its own best interest.It pains me to say it, I wish ALPA was better, but if UAL had bought TWA, no TWA pilots would be flying for them. And ALPA would have let it go without a peep!
I would have rather taken my chances with the ALPA Merger Policy and binding arbitration. However, this may be the most illustrative example of how the APA will fight for its members while ALPA (National) acts in its own best interest.
Fer sher! Like those geniuses at China Air, wtih their super-duper engine-securing seatbelts? Or maybe those keen decision-makers at British Airways who value avoiding payouts to pax if the flight doesn't get them home quickly...so they flog a Whale from LAX to Ooops!...short-of-the-destination?
We need to be more like them?---->No, we're going to do it our way...I really don't think our FAA has anything to do with the China Air seatbelts. BTW, Americans fly on China Air and BA every single day. They could care less about seat belts on engines or Whale flogging (?).
Cool! Sign me up for universal health care, the Queen on our money, and nary a glimpse of the Stanley Cup in many years...and we'll talk.---You can have all that stuff. The ALPA President already has his name on a contract that allows pilots to fly up to age 65. Like it or not, it's there. If you want Queens on your money, or Universal Health Care...write your congressman.
"But Mom! Stevie has a bigger piece of pie than me!" is not a valid argument for a change that would disrupt the industry.---> HOW did a piece of pie get into all this? Did someone make that comment?
I agree...we shouldn't do it, "just because". But the change has happened, it is in the US of A airspace every day, and it is the ICAO age change that is driving this....
The safest mode of transportation on this blue marble is flying on a Part 121 airliner in the United States of America.
Ain't broke...don't "fix" it.
You already know where the FAA Administrator stands on this. And she has the support of her superiors. Discussions on FI are fun...but they carry no weight with the DC crowd.
APA would be all for changing the age 60 rule if American had terminated their A plan--they don't care a fig for the travelling public-just follow the money. (emphasis added)
if UAL had bought TWA, no TWA pilots would be flying for them.
And ALPA would have let it go without a peep!