Good Morning,
1st, there is no "self-help". What are you going to do as an F/O? Call in sick? Stand on the brakes so the CA can't taxi? WTFO?
Wow, no kidding. That term was being used in a generic sense. Meaning the world is grey, not black and white like you are stating.
OK, just making sure, because unlike in person, you can't read someone's "tone" or "intent" on here.
2nd, the General is absolutely correct in using the NWA/DAL merger/acquisition as a baseline for comparison. Why? Because that's what an arbitrator is going to do.
In reality, it will probably be Frontier/Republic that will be the baseline for this arbitration.
Why do you think so? Frontier was in dire financial trouble and had been bleeding red ink for years. AirTran is not. All the difference in the world.
On the contrary, from what I'm hearing, your SWAPA colleagues proposed something quite untenable for the AirTran pilots today. They are hard at work to represent your best interests, as are our representatives from the AirTran ALPA MEC. It's an opening position, and it's negotiations. Like you said before, it's business, not personal, although your vitriolic post makes me suspect it *IS* rather personal for you.
By your "I'm all knowing and superior" tone, I can say the same about you. But, I will take it down a notch. It's easy to post when your ticked off. Doesn't change my position though.
I'm not asking you to change your position; I'm asking you to realize that it's not ALL THE PILOTS AT AIRTRAN trying to come to your front door and demand to have the master bedroom, the TV remote, and you keep paying the mortgage and mowing the lawn. I hate to see the acrimony this early in the game, that's all, when at the end of the day, a deal will be struck somewhere in the middle or an arbitrator will PICK a deal somewhere in the middle, we won't get to be in the driver's seat for it, and *WHO KNOWS* how that will end up. I would prefer pilots from both sides who know each other's respective groups find something equitable. Am I dreaming? Maybe. But I think it's doable, if both sides recognize that BOTH sides bring something to the table.
p.s. Yeah, I get that a lot; because I write very formally, it comes off condescending. It's not intended, my apologies. My demeanor in person isn't nearly as formal (when my coworkers meet me after years of reading the union work I've done and things I've posted on the message board, I get a lot of "you're not like I imagined you".)
July 2011. Yes, that's right, about 10 months from now. Why? That's easy.
Now that truly is funny! Its could take 6 months to iron out the transition agreement with the company. When we finally do start at SLI negotiations you think we will go from start, to completion of Arbitration in FOUR months. Now that is truly interesting. No, impossible.
Well, we don't START SLI negotiations 6 months from now when the final paperwork is signed, DoJ review is done, etc, we started SLI negotiations YESTERDAY and probably will continue to meet and negotiate over the next 4-6 months as the deal is finalized. That means, on DoS, if we feel we are at a stalemate, we could immediately invoke the arbitration provision of Bond-McCaskill... or we could have come to an agreement with the SWAPA Merger Committee and it could happen BEFORE a year from now.
The timeline isn't perfectly linear - many things can overlap each other.
You cannot force AirTran pilots to work on a B-scale indefinitely.
I never said that. I said if QOL is all your truly worried about, a "B" scale solution can probably be worked out in everyones favor. I realize that will never happen, just calling BS on some of the posts written by Airtran guys.
Yes, there's been some things written on both sides of the table that are either written in fear or grandstanding, just the nature of the beast. I didn't pick up on (nor do I think many others did) that you were being facetious about the B-scale idea. Glad to know you were just trying to make a point.
The General was spot-on in his previous post: the AirTran pilots will start enjoying the benefits of the Southwest contract and you could wind up with a MUCH WORSE position in an SLI than negotiating it.
I could not agree more. Your Airtran guys are the ones touting pay raise and relative seniority. Your a moderator, go back and read some of the posts on this subject.
I have read every post in this (and the other) threads. The pay raise isn't being touted, it's just a fact of life. There's not a way to avoid that, in reality. As far as the rest, what do you expect? You have a few Southwest pilots saying that just because your management made a business decision that your pilots should automatically INCREASE their seniority at the expense of the AirTran pilots. For a carrier that was on the verge of bankruptcy (Frontier), IN Bankruptcy (ATA), or outright shut down, that argument might have merit. However, for a company that was doing JUST FINE on its own, it is simply an argument that doesn't apply.
Likewise, demanding that the #1 AirTran guy be slotted right next to the #1 Southwest guy, the #2 AAI next to the #2 SWA, etc, isn't going to fly over there, and the VAST majority of our pilots know it. If we had that, it would make our entire seniority list senior to half of your TOTAL pilots.
At some point, you have to separate the money side of the issue and realize that relative bidding position for schedule, days off, vacation, is in many ways JUST as much of an issue as the money once you're making a certain income level. We also have to realize that we *ARE* going to be making quite a bit more money, and that to keep peace in the family, it's going to have to be fair. It's a delicate balance, and as has been said many times before, "A successful merged list pi$$es *EVERYONE* off". An exaggeration, for certain, but one that has a basis more in reality than not.
None of us want that. We are happy that this is happening, most of us have a lot of friends over there that we are looking forward to working with again. We have been fair with other airlines when we were in the driver's seat, we simply ask that you extend us the same courtesy.
That will happen, but you will have to be willing to give some as we give. All these things (pay, qol, schedule, work rules) that you are about to benefit from, we have worked hard to secure over the years. If you think it was easy to do, I ask why we are not taking your pay rates?
I think you will find the majority of AAI pilots are more than willing to give a little, but that doesn't mean we're interested in a staple job for a large part of our list, either.
We are still playing a little catch-up over here. Your M&A committee has not only the advantage of having been given advance notice by your management that this was coming and ours wasn't, but your M&A committee also has been through this rodeo (albeit fairly quickly and unsuccessfully) with Frontier fairly recently. I imagine our Merger Committee will meet with yours quite a bit in the months to come and we'll see what they come up with. Just trying to keep this board civil, realizing that a vocal few who are aggressive and hostile don't represent the whole... on EITHER side of the table.