T45 and Co..
Can someone from SWA explain to me why relative seniority is such a bad deal for you?
i mean.. do you really think that airtran is going to come in and get better then relative seniority and you are going to get worse? That means worst case you will be right where you are today, only with future growth.
I understand the upgrade times might be delayed.. but which side will now face a longer delay?
This is a lot different then buying (F9) a company in bankruptcy and shrinking and trying to preserve jobs. -I for one prefer the DAL/NWA model over the LCC/AW one.
Lets take a look at 4 pilots on each list
#1 pilots, at 25%, 50% and 75% levels
#1 seniority
SWA DOH Sept. 1974 pay rate $206
A.T DOH Sept 1993 pay rate $153 net gain 35% raise and 19yrs seniority
25% level
SWA DOH Mar 1996 pay rate $206
A.T DOH Mar 2001 pay rate $144 net gain 43% raise and 5 years seniority
50% level
SWA DOH Mar 2001 pay rate $199
A.T DOH Sept 2004 pay rate $74 net gain 69% raise and 3.5 years
75% level
SWA DOH Nov 2005 pay rate $124
A.T DOH Aug 2006 pay rate $66 net gain 88% raise and 1.3 years
payrates taken from airlinepilotcentral.com
Please will some one who believes in relative seniority explain to me #1 how is that fair and #2 how that wouldn't be a windfall.
Someone mentioned career expectations well we all have career expectations but those are not guaranteed. When I was hired upgrade was 5 years...things change ie. retirement age, recession etc.... why does airtran pilots career expectations trump Southwest pilots expectations?