Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No they don't. Flying to a couple of cities in Mexico doesn't count. Wow, they talked to Monterrey Center, or maybe it was Mazatlan. Flying the WATRS routes, the NAT tracks, a random route to Africa, or deep SA is International. I know, going to Mexico is technically international, but there's nothing challenging about it.Plenty of former regional guys have intl exp....whats ur point Cappy.
Tell that to CP Webb
In this case, the pilots would move to where there was one, an opening and two, to where their seniority would hold. So if all the 787 spots moved to OAK, then yes, they would all go to OAK, no matter seniority, and would not be able to move to another domicile until a vacancy existed that they could hold based on their seniority.The difference (if there is a difference) is that the pilots who were awarded 717 positions to occupy when they crossed the fence to SW in the transition bid will be displaced out of equipment because their awarded bid position doesn't exist anymore. To my knowledge this has never happened to a SW pilot, getting pushed out the bottom of a base when the company reduces the size of the base is not the same thing. I don't know what, if anything, the SW contract says as far as handling an equipment displacement but I think that's the question.
Let's say that tomorrow SW said they were buying 20 787's, awarded the vacancies and sent a bunch of pilots off to school. Then, after the pilots completed training and flew the planes for a year the company disposed of the 787 fleet and these pilots got displaced from their 787 equipment bid awards and had to go back to the 737. Would these (let's say very senior) pilots have to go back to say, OAK and LAS if those were the only bases available or could they use their seniority to displace more junior pilots to get back to DAL, HOU or wherever? This is the scenario that's being discussed I think but I may be wrong. I don't know if the SW contract says anything because SW only has one aircraft type so it's never happened before until now.
In this case, the pilots would move to where there was one, an opening and two, to where their seniority would hold. So if all the 787 spots moved to OAK, then yes, they would all go to OAK, no matter seniority, and would not be able to move to another domicile until a vacancy existed that they could hold based on their seniority.
Highly unlikely though, first, getting rid of jets without jets to replace them.... While SWA has backed out of markets slowly, they have with rare exception, never walked away. And usually only because they had other bigger fish to fry with the assets at their disposal (SFO and DEN first time closings ring the bell)
The way you cry like a baby on here is really sad and stooping to phallic insults when u can't make an argument is an insult to the your regional airline ...oh and ur a big *************************
His "regional" airline? Is that supposed to be some kind of put down? You do fly for SWA right? U probably don't even see the irony in that do ya?
No they don't. Flying to a couple of cities in Mexico doesn't count. Wow, they talked to Monterrey Center, or maybe it was Mazatlan. Flying the WATRS routes, the NAT tracks, a random route to Africa, or deep SA is International. I know, going to Mexico is technically international, but there's nothing challenging about it.
Welcome to the bigs! Don't trip over yourselves scrambling to get off the rat ship!
His "regional" airline? Is that supposed to be some kind of put down? You do fly for SWA right? U probably don't even see the irony in that do ya?
737's are "big iron" to him . . . the rest of the planes in his profile are turboprops.
Kind of funny that he just upgraded into one of our coveted CA seats, and instead of enjoying it, he comes on here and throws rocks at the guys who will be flying FO for him.
I'm thinking he's not digging the left seat reserve in OAK. :crying:
She clearly doesn't get the irony of working for a "regional" airline and yet trying to denigrate someone else for doing the same thing.
Ahhhh . . . . It is what it is. At least we'll finally have shoes and jackets that match. . . . Never quite got the brown jackets with black shoes thing.Can't wait to get to the "bigs" and all of that golden rule culture they have going over there. How bout you Ty?
She clearly doesn't get the irony of working for a "regional" airline and yet trying to denigrate someone else for doing the same thing. Given her lack of luv for us not surprised she can't see how bad that makes her look. There is one in every crowd. What's really disappointing is the shortage of her SWAPA colleagues on here shouting down her idiocy. Can't wait to get to the "bigs" and all of that golden rule culture they have going over there. How bout you Ty?
On the bright side, however, I suspect that in real life, the vast majority on both sides are civil, polite, nice, and even accommodating when face to face. Why, I bet that includes even Sacha and Madjack, and even Fletch, ATLplt and 717.