The FAA would have eviscerated the crew if they had attempted a crosswind landing, beyond their company limitations, and had struck a pylon/tip when a perfectly good piece of concrete pointing into the wind was right there.
I guarantee in the post-incident investigation, the local controllers would have said "31R would have been available had you just asked for it".
That wouldn't appear to be the case here. I think it's pretty clear ATC indicated an emergency needed to be declared.
And before Jaun gets his panties in a wad, are you reading something different. JFK should have been using 31 for landing ops. Shouldn't take an emergency to get the runway you want! geez.
BUT, we don't even know what the emergency was, or if there even WAS an emergency.
Think about it. ATC said if you want 31 you need to declare. OK, so they declared....
Allright, whats the nature....Uhhh...well, we don't have an emergency...but you told us we had to declare to use the runway of our choice...
OK, so if THAT is really what is going on, then the comments by the flight crew and their actions of 'we're bringing her in folks, get out of the way, sure seems a bit odd, wouldn't you agree?
Why wouldn't you simply follow ATC instructions, take the hand-off and get in line for that runway, right?
What are we missing here? Can't believe we haven't had an AA'er chime in with some more scoop.