A Southwest pilot perspective

[SWA Bubba]

Unfortunately, due to fear and hubris, SWAPA has taken a different path, one which will ultimately lead to dysfunction.

Correction. SWA, not SWAPA has taken a different path. In case you hadn't noticed, GK and management is running this show, not SWAPA. That's also much to the chagrin of a lot of pilots in SWAPA.

Bubba

 

[Fubijaakr]

Correction. SWA, not SWAPA has taken a different path. In case you hadn't noticed, GK and management is running this show, not SWAPA. That's also much to the chagrin of a lot of pilots in SWAPA.

That is a true statement. And I don't believe the posters here have a clue what the God King is thinking.

And I wasn't really comparing 1900s to 737s. I was illustrating differences. What if GL bought some 737s? THEN, can their four-year CA integrate into your list and contract at his 10% seniority?

Reminds me of the saying: "If 'Ifs and Buts' were candy and nuts, we'd all have a Merry Christmas."

Your premise is faulty on the face of it. GLUX doesn't fly 737s. Period. So to address your facetious premise would be just as faulty.

In fact, AAI and SWA pilots have the same "career expectations." Career expectations historically differentiated between widebody and narrowbody CA seats. Ask a Republic pilot how that works.

For you to apply "career expectations" to wages is flat wrong and won't last a NYC minute with an arbitrator. But, go ahead and argue the "Shuttle America" theory.

Then belly up to the bar for a BIG helping of crow.

I can't wait to laugh in your faces when this is all over. You'll be ashamed to wear those ridiculous flag ties in public.

 

[On Your Six]

Another example for On My Six:

Suppose I walked into ATN one day in Aug 2010 (you know,... before...) with a wagon-load of SWA badges, and said that anyone who wanted to come with me would be guaranteed a spot in the next new-hire class. Type ratings and our minimums not required. I'll bet I could have taken 90% of your F/Os and not just a few of your Capts. Before you get all huffy and claim that that's not true, our People department has literally hundreds of applications from active Airtran pilots which says it is true. Some of those aps are from active Airtran capts, I might add. And we both know that there would be a lot more Airtran pilot aps with SWA, if not the fact that a bunch of your F/Os don't meet our mins yet and couldn't have applied.

How 'bout this: If I made that offer and said that in addition, everyone would be pay-protected, I'll bet I'd get ALL the F/Os and a heck of a lot of your Capt as well. We both know it's true. ATN pilots would drop the ALPA-on-strike signs they were working on, and rush in a caravan to Dallas as fast as they could.

But now that the acquisition deal went through, things seem to have changed somewhat. Since ALPA national has assured you that our contract and money are your God-given right, and that we have to take you; now you're singing a different tune. Suddenly, we're equals in every way. Suddenly, Airtran was just as great of an employment opportunity as Southwest.

Anyway, like I said, this is the perspective of the average SWA pilot. We're all thinking, "how can they actually say that with a straight face?" I'm telling you this for your information. Not because we believe we're superior people, but rather that SWA is a superior company compared to Airtran. I'm not trying to be personal, or run down Airtran's worth, I'm simply illustrating my
point that we are not equals in terms of companies.

Bubba

Bubba,

I understand your point, I really do. UAL was a lot like this in the early 90s, full of company pride that bordered on cockiness. It's one thing to believe inthis yourself, and another to try to convince others of the same. Some companies do pay better and have better benefits, and probably do have stacks of resumes waiting for a chance. That's great and all, but a lot of that doesn't matter in arbitration. Pay and benefits don't really matter. In fact, in the last successful mainline merger with a SLI, the payrates and benefits were blended between the two groups BEFORE the arbitration happened. The SLI came down to what each brought to the table, plane wise, hub wise, size wise. If you are bigger, you would probably have a better ratio. If you are an older airline, you might get more of the top spots. I missed my current airline's arbitration, but I watched it and have talked to many who had gone through it. You just have to ride the roller coaster and try not to alienate your future brothers over there, because some may turn out to be your captain someday.


Godspeed!


OYS

 

[SWA Bubba]

Bubba,

I understand your point, I really do. UAL was a lot like this in the early 90s, full of company pride that bordered on cockiness. It's one thing to believe inthis yourself, and another to try to convince others of the same. Some companies do pay better and have better benefits, and probably do have stacks of resumes waiting for a chance. That's great and all, but a lot of that doesn't matter in arbitration. Pay and benefits don't really matter. In fact, in the last successful mainline merger with a SLI, the payrates and benefits were blended between the two groups BEFORE the arbitration happened. The SLI came down to what each brought to the table, plane wise, hub wise, size wise. If you are bigger, you would probably have a better ratio. If you are an older airline, you might get more of the top spots. I missed my current airline's arbitration, but I watched it and have talked to many who had gone through it. You just have to ride the roller coaster and try not to alienate your future brothers over there, because some may turn out to be your captain someday.


Godspeed!


OYS

Unlike many others on this forum, I'm trying not to alienate ANYBODY. I started off simply trying to demonstrate SWA pilots' point of view. Everyone from ATN on this forum seems to think that SWA pilots are arrogant, "seniority-stealing" pricks because we don't agree with them. That's just not the case. And, of course, for my trouble, I've been labeled an arrogant prick just for daring to civily point out that I didn't agree with them. You did a little of that yourself, don't you think?

As far as SLIs go, everyone is different, and I suspect this one will be vastly different then any other. Yes, I'm proud of the company I work for, but I really believe SWA is different in this regard. ALPA seems to assume arbitration is the be-all/end-all, and plans for that from the outset. Personally, I don't think Gary would let it go to arbitration or allow an arbitrated list to be integrated. <NOTE TO EVERYONE: don't flame me! I'm not threatening anyone; that's just my personal opinion, and I could be wrong!> Remember, this is NOT an ALPA airline. ALPA rules and precedence don't really apply here.

And to you personally, I assumed you were an ATN pilot from the way you posted. Other posters on this thread even indicated you were. I guess you can color me confused. If you're not, then I suppose I shouldn't have directed my "education campaign" in your direction.

Bubba

 

[Hpilot]

For you to apply "career expectations" to wages is flat wrong and won't last a NYC minute with an arbitrator. But, go ahead and argue the "Shuttle America" theory.

Yes, I totally agree an arbitrator isn't going to give a rats cajones about how great the SW pilots think they are. In fact, if they show this level of arrogance, they will probably get a good smack down from the arbitrator.

 

[maru657]

Career expectations??? Southwest expectations were based on a business model that requires constant growth. That model is basically a Ponsi scheme and is obviously broken, ergo 11 year co-pilots who are controlling the dialogue. Southwest was always the darling child of de-regulation which never worked as advertised and required constant love from Sweet Uncle. Now with a broken economy and no where else to grow, them chickens are looking for a place to roost. On one hand you might think chicken soup and lots of fertilizer but it's still just chicken s*#t.

 

[FDJ2]

Have to disagree with you here. The "seat expectations" (i.e. what we actually do and fly to earn a paycheck) may be essentially identical (737 CA), but the "career expectations" (i.e. how well can I provide for my family and retirement, benefits, job security, etc.) are wildly different. There's no one who can debate that in a serious tone. Not even you.

Then bring that argument to the negotiating table and arbitrator if need be. If SWAPA truly felt that was a legitimate point that should dominate the construction of the list, have the courage of your convictions and bring it to arbitration.

 

[FDJ2]

Correction. SWA, not SWAPA has taken a different path. In case you hadn't noticed, GK and management is running this show, not SWAPA. That's also much to the chagrin of a lot of pilots in SWAPA.

Bubba

I believe that SWAPA and the SWA pilots for the most part are supporting managements fear and intimidation tactic. I might be wrong, if I am, show me any resolution from SWAPA committing them to support pay equity for the AAI pilots and full integration after SOC and a single list is determined.

 

[slaquer5]

I believe .

I believe. FDJ2 eats his own poop.

 

[tin]

One more perspective

Not sure if Im posting this link correctly but.........................


http://www.bpfrommer.com/songs/Louis Armstrong - What A Wonderful World.mp3

 

[SWA717]

Bubba,
You seem like a good dude and most of us at ATN get it and understand the culture. Take the crap you read here with a grain of salt. It represents less than 5% of us Trannies.

 

[Fubijaakr]

Yes, I totally agree an arbitrator isn't going to give a rats cajones about how great the SW pilots think they are. In fact, if they show this level of arrogance, they will probably get a good smack down from the arbitrator.

Career expectations??? Southwest expectations were based on a business model that requires constant growth. That model is basically a Ponsi scheme and is obviously broken, ergo 11 year co-pilots who are controlling the dialogue. Southwest was always the darling child of de-regulation which never worked as advertised and required constant love from Sweet Uncle. Now with a broken economy and no where else to grow, them chickens are looking for a place to roost. On one hand you might think chicken soup and lots of fertilizer but it's still just chicken s*#t.

Then bring that argument to the negotiating table and arbitrator if need be. If SWAPA truly felt that was a legitimate point that should dominate the construction of the list, have the courage of your convictions and bring it to arbitration.

Ding! Ding! Ding! 3 guys who get it. Believe me, we went into an arbitration with an arrogant attitude and got our butts handed to us.

Bubba,
You seem like a good dude and most of us at ATN get it and understand the culture. Take the crap you read here with a grain of salt. It represents less than 5% of us Trannies.

Apparently the MEC acted on the input your rank and file gave them.

 

[SWA717]

Yes and there alot of rank and file who have finally had a wake up call and realized they were not given all of the facts.

 

[puddlejumper101]

Yes and there alot of rank and file who have finally had a wake up call and realized they were not given all of the facts.

I also believe you guys, like us, being the rank and file will be ok once this blows over. I never thought the ALPA exit was going to be painless. I think we all knew that. SWA, SWAPA, and the rank and file at ATN. I just hope your 10% along with our 10% STFU once this is over and just play ball. Maybe we can redirect all of this BS at mother DAL in ATL instead of at eachother.

 

[puddlejumper101]

Yes and there alot of rank and file who have finally had a wake up call and realized they were not given all of the facts.

I think 90% of you will love it here once the dust settles and we move on. The thing is either one of us can make an argument as to why we are getting screwed and that goes for all pilots at both companies. We both have compelling arguments as to why, but the thing I want to know is how we are going to move on and get guys on both sides to
STFU and not start arguments and fights in cockpits, hotels, etc... especially since both rank and file groups were taken for a ride neither one of us really wanted.

 

[SWA Bubba]

Career expectations??? Southwest expectations were based on a business model that requires constant growth. That model is basically a Ponsi scheme and is obviously broken, ergo 11 year co-pilots who are controlling the dialogue. Southwest was always the darling child of de-regulation which never worked as advertised and required constant love from Sweet Uncle. Now with a broken economy and no where else to grow, them chickens are looking for a place to roost. On one hand you might think chicken soup and lots of fertilizer but it's still just chicken s*#t.

Maru, I can't tell if you and your friends hpilot, fdj2, and fubijaakr (and on your six, for that matter) are actually ATN guys trying to advocate a position, or simply pot-stirrers. I'm leaning towards the latter: since a lot of your posts are ad-hominem and straw man attacks, and basically consist of shouting the same things over and over and generally congratulating each other for agreeing with you all (as if that means anything).

My guess is Delta guys trying to stir up trouble, 'cause you're a little worried about what will happen when a larger SWA starts competing with you in Atlanta.

Well, what say you guys? You don't have to give your names, but how about identifying your airline so everyone knows your actual agenda? Or you could just go back to your baiting exercise. Don't forget to keep quoting each other just as if any of you are know the first thing about this situation, and are authorities in anything other than troublemaking.

Bubba

 

[SWA Bubba]

Career expectations??? Southwest expectations were based on a business model that requires constant growth. That model is basically a Ponsi scheme and is obviously broken, ergo 11 year co-pilots who are controlling the dialogue. Southwest was always the darling child of de-regulation which never worked as advertised and required constant love from Sweet Uncle. Now with a broken economy and no where else to grow, them chickens are looking for a place to roost. On one hand you might think chicken soup and lots of fertilizer but it's still just chicken s*#t.

Just for the Maru guy, who has yet to offer a single rational and cogent arument on this or any other thread:

All airlines need growth. Growth for upgrades, etc. You don't grow, you shrink and die. A Ponzi scheme? Obviously broken? Again, what are you smoking? SWA has grown while others have shrunk, has worked exactly as advertised, continues to pay and treat its employees much better than every other airline on earth, and, oh yeah, STILL makes money year after year after year.

Requiring constant love from Sweet Uncle (Uncle Sam, I assume you mean)? Did you really just say that with a straight face, or were you actually laughing when you typed that? Think back: SWA is the airline that took nothing from the govt after 9/11. No loans, grants, etc. NOTHING. They laid off NOBODY. They kept hiring (albeit at a slower rate). They kept giving profitablilty and cost of living raises. It became the envy of the airline world. Your airline? Uh, not so much.

Bubba.

 

[General Lee]

Maru, I can't tell if you and your friends hpilot, fdj2, and fubijaakr (and on your six, for that matter) are actually ATN guys trying to advocate a position, or simply pot-stirrers. I'm leaning towards the latter: since a lot of your posts are ad-hominem and straw man attacks, and basically consist of shouting the same things over and over and generally congratulating each other for agreeing with you all (as if that means anything).

My guess is Delta guys trying to stir up trouble, 'cause you're a little worried about what will happen when a larger SWA starts competing with you in Atlanta.

Well, what say you guys? You don't have to give your names, but how about identifying your airline so everyone knows your actual agenda? Or you could just go back to your baiting exercise. Don't forget to keep quoting each other just as if any of you are know the first thing about this situation, and are authorities in anything other than troublemaking.

Bubba

Why would Delta guys try to stir up trouble, when YOUR guys were the ones with the lowball offer and constant putdowns on this and other forums to the Airtran people? You treat your new family members really poorly, and most of the posts I have seen on here from OYS and Fubi have been for you guys to tone it down. Your mergers with Muse and Morris were a lot easier back then because the Gov't didn't care as much, until the TWA guys were lambasted by AA. Now it's not as easy to staple, and recent arbitration awards now seem like the norm.

Instead of putdowns and subliminal comparisons to crappy prop companies like Great Lakes, why don't you just accept that Airtran is a miniature version of you, and it won't be merged in at the bottom. You may lose some seniority, and you can thank your CEO for that, not the people who want QOL and better pay, who are just like everyone else. Try not to believe your hype, and especially not the hype of your dumb TV commercials.



Bye Bye---General Lee

 

[chase]

SWABubba

With all due respect from a fellow SWA pilot, SWA did take gov funds after 911.

Howev we also were the only airline to pay taxes on the money since we were the only ones making a profit.

 

[Fubijaakr]

With all due respect from a fellow SWA pilot, SWA did take gov funds after 911.

Howev we also were the only airline to pay taxes on the money since we were the only ones making a profit.

Don't confuse him with facts.

 

[SWA Bubba]

Why would Delta guys try to stir up trouble, when YOUR guys were the ones with the lowball offer and constant putdowns on this and other forums to the Airtran people? You treat your new family members really poorly, and most of the posts I have seen on here from OYS and Fubi have been for you guys to tone it down. Your mergers with Muse and Morris were a lot easier back then because the Gov't didn't care as much, until the TWA guys were lambasted by AA. Now it's not as easy to staple, and recent arbitration awards now seem like the norm.

Instead of putdowns and subliminal comparisons to crappy prop companies like Great Lakes, why don't you just accept that Airtran is a miniature version of you, and it won't be merged in at the bottom. You may lose some seniority, and you can thank your CEO for that, not the people who want QOL and better pay, who are just like everyone else. Try not to believe your hype, and especially not the hype of your dumb TV commercials.



Bye Bye---General Lee

Uh, actually essentially NONE of the posts from OYS and Fubi have been of the "tone it down" variety. They're mostly instigating barbs.

And as far as my comparison to "crappy prop companies," it was an illustration as to differences. You keep essentially saying that since we both fly the same types of planes, we must be equal.

Okay. New comparison. First Air Airlines. They're an outfit in Canada. Look it up. They fly 737s, 727s and even 757s. However, they're a small company whose pay and benefits more closely resembles Greyhound Bus Lines than ANY airline. With YOUR logic, you "have to accept that [First Air] is a miniature version of [Airtran]" and shouldn't be merged near the bottom.

Still think aircraft type is the only metric? I suppose if Airtran had bought First Air (instead of GL), then you'd be clamoring for First Air guys to be merged as equals, right? The First Air 4-year Capt on a 737 jet should be right after Airtran's first coupla' guys right? Why hell, I suppose their 757 guys ought to go to the TOP of Airtran's list with your logic. After all, it's a "better" aircraft, promoting superior career expectations. That IS the position you're espousing, right? Or are you going to continue arguing out of both sides of your mouth?

Bubba

 

[Cruncher]

SWA Bubba,

You are absolutely wasting your time.

 

[SWA Bubba]

SWABubba

With all due respect from a fellow SWA pilot, SWA did take gov funds after 911.

Howev we also were the only airline to pay taxes on the money since we were the only ones making a profit.

I stand corrected. As you stated, SWA took gov funds in the form of compensation for lost income due the the government-mandated airspace shutdown. As was offered to every airline.

What I was referring to was loans and grants of the "please help us stay in business" variety, of which SWA asked for none.

And of course, then Fubi proved my last point exactly. Instead of a "tone it down" comment claimed by Gen Lee, or even constructive disagreement (you know, discussing the actual merits of a disagreement), he jumped straight onto the instigating barb. Thanks for proving me correct on THAT issue at least.

Bubba

 

[TillerTurner]

"Those convinced against their will, are of the same opinion still."
SWA Bubba, you are wasting your breath.

 

[ASADFW7]

So one new guy comes on here and gives his opinion and the whole conversation has to start all over again?

 

[General Lee]

Uh, actually essentially NONE of the posts from OYS and Fubi have been of the "tone it down" variety. They're mostly instigating barbs.

And as far as my comparison to "crappy prop companies," it was an illustration as to differences. You keep essentially saying that since we both fly the same types of planes, we must be equal.

Okay. New comparison. First Air Airlines. They're an outfit in Canada. Look it up. They fly 737s, 727s and even 757s. However, they're a small company whose pay and benefits more closely resembles Greyhound Bus Lines than ANY airline. With YOUR logic, you "have to accept that [First Air] is a miniature version of [Airtran]" and shouldn't be merged near the bottom.

Still think aircraft type is the only metric? I suppose if Airtran had bought First Air (instead of GL), then you'd be clamoring for First Air guys to be merged as equals, right? The First Air 4-year Capt on a 737 jet should be right after Airtran's first coupla' guys right? Why hell, I suppose their 757 guys ought to go to the TOP of Airtran's list with your logic. After all, it's a "better" aircraft, promoting superior career expectations. That IS the position you're espousing, right? Or are you going to continue arguing out of both sides of your mouth?

Bubba

First off, I believe First Air in Canada actually has a 767-200F, not a 757. Anyway, I understand where you are going, but you need to follow OYS' advice and look at what arbitrators are ruling. You can state your opinion, but that really doesn't matter compared to the people who actually make those decisions. They are NEUTRALS, who look at the total picutre. If First Air was merging with Air Canada, I really doubt their pilots would be merged into the top of their combined list. But, maybe a few of their guys would. That is what you fail to see, is that arbitrators may throw a few Airtran guys near the top (probably not the top), and then blend them in at some ratio, probably comparable to SWA's size vs Airtran's size. Look at Nicelau's decision at USAir. The top 500 were all USAir East, because they flew A330s and 767s to Europe, and AWA didn't have those types of Operations at the time. The rest of the group was pretty much merged in relative from that point down. AWA was smaller than USAir, but still got that award. I see that SWA is bigger, and has higher profits, but Airtran is NOT in BK, and does have the same type planes (which takes away the USAir --INTL top 500 comparison for you).

Look to the recent past (arbitrated awards), to see what could be in store for any arbitrated list you may have. ALPA knows this, and I think others may be starting to wake up to that fact too. Remember, your airline is bigger, and you could have big ratios between pilots, but there might be a lot more Airtran pilots in higher spots compared to that first offer.


Bye Bye---General Lee

 

[Sacha]

General/OYS,

Are we required to implement the arbitrated list by law, no matter what? Or could we just say that's a nice list, but we are changing the direction of the airline. Is the government this powerful? Have we been declared a Single Carrier? Help me out. You wisdom is starting to scare me. Maybe we should vote in ALPA.....there is such a great legacy in their past........let's start with Midwest and then move on to TWA, Air Wisconsin
Pan Am, Eastern, Braniff, Republic,USAIR........and.....

 

[FDJ2]

Okay. New comparison. First Air Airlines. They're an outfit in Canada. Look it up. They fly 737s, 727s and even 757s. However, they're a small company whose pay and benefits more closely resembles Greyhound Bus Lines than ANY airline. With YOUR logic, you "have to accept that [First Air] is a miniature version of [Airtran]" and shouldn't be merged near the bottom.

Still think aircraft type is the only metric? I suppose if Airtran had bought First Air (instead of GL), then you'd be clamoring for First Air guys to be merged as equals, right? The First Air 4-year Capt on a 737 jet should be right after Airtran's first coupla' guys right? Why hell, I suppose their 757 guys ought to go to the TOP of Airtran's list with your logic. After all, it's a "better" aircraft, promoting superior career expectations. That IS the position you're espousing, right? Or are you going to continue arguing out of both sides of your mouth?

Bubba

Bubba, it doesn't matter what example you use. The point is that the First Air pilots, the AAI pilots, etc. all deserve the same thing, which is a fair process and a fair integration. That process should involve good faith negotiations, free from intimidation and threats. If good faith negotiations don't produce a mutually acceptable list, then a fair arbitration process by an independent neutral (s), should examine all the facts, listen to all the arguments and produce a fair and equitable list. The results of a negotiated list or arbitrated list should be accepted and implemented by all parties.

It's about a process, that is respectful of each pilot, not about using threats and intimidation to coerce an unfair list. A list that is coerced will never be accepted and will ultimately lead to a dysfunctional group.

 

[SWA Bubba]

First off, I believe First Air in Canada actually has a 767-200F, not a 757. Anyway, I understand where you are going, but you need to follow OYS' advice and look at what arbitrators are ruling. You can state your opinion, but that really doesn't matter compared to the people who actually make those decisions. They are NEUTRALS, who look at the total picutre. If First Air was merging with Air Canada, I really doubt their pilots would be merged into the top of their combined list. But, maybe a few of their guys would. That is what you fail to see, is that arbitrators may throw a few Airtran guys near the top (probably not the top), and then blend them in at some ratio, probably comparable to SWA's size vs Airtran's size. Look at Nicelau's decision at USAir. The top 500 were all USAir East, because they flew A330s and 767s to Europe, and AWA didn't have those types of Operations at the time. The rest of the group was pretty much merged in relative from that point down. AWA was smaller than USAir, but still got that award. I see that SWA is bigger, and has higher profits, but Airtran is NOT in BK, and does have the same type planes (which takes away the USAir --INTL top 500 comparison for you).

Look to the recent past (arbitrated awards), to see what could be in store for any arbitrated list you may have. ALPA knows this, and I think others may be starting to wake up to that fact too. Remember, your airline is bigger, and you could have big ratios between pilots, but there might be a lot more Airtran pilots in higher spots compared to that first offer.


Bye Bye---General Lee

You're right: 767 not 757. Guess I should have put on my reading glasses when I was reading about First Air on the internet. In fact, I had never even heard of First Air until I heard about their recent crash. However having 767 pilots (vice 757) could lead to even higher "career expectations" for First Air pilots in my hypothetical. My point was the ATN argument on this forum is essentially that ATN & SWA are exactly equal because they fly the same type of metal. Also, ATN is "better" then GL, because they're a "crappy little prop company." I wonder if the people spouting that view would hold the same view compared to First Air. What say you, ATN? Are you exactly equal to First Air because they also fly jets?

As far as the AW/US arbitration, as you said, ignoring the heavy, trans-Atlantic metric at the top, essentially it was a relative seniority SLI. What you didn't mention, however, was that that was nearly exactly what the AW side proposed. The US side wanted DOH, because that would favor them immensely. Did you know that their opening position was to have their furloughed guys come back and displace active AW pilots onto the street? When they didn't get it, all sorts of hijinks occurred, and the fighting continues after five years.

You also mentioned that arbitrators are neutral who "look at the total picture." On this I agree. Others (Fubi, etc.) claim that the only thing an arbitrator would look at is the size of metal. Really? That's the "total picture"?

I personally don't fear arbitration, because I believe that an arbitrator will look at the total picture. You know, compensation, benefits, company's quality and health, quality of life, etc. How about job security? Won't a neutral notice 'never furloughed' vs 'about to strike (and possibly burn the place down)'? Like I said, -I- think a true neutral would favor us in arbitration. However it is the unknown, and nobody (least of all, GK) likes the unknown.

Bubba

 

[tankerhead]

Bubba, you're really rehashing what's already been futilely hashed, rehashed, smothered and covered.

Riddle me this, though. WHAT WAS THE FREAKING POINT OF THE PROCESS AGREEMENT!?!! Why did y'all bother to agree to it, if Gary and SWAPA knew all along that they were gonna wipe their collective asses with it.

Plain English or a fancy, contrived example will be fine. I really want to hear why you think it's OK to sign the thing, and then threaten to ignore it with extreme prejudice.