A Southwest pilot perspective

[SWA Bubba]

More for On Your Six (by God, I'm gonna' get him to see our point of view if it kills me!):

Looking at it another way, those applications mean that nearly 500 of your pilots (incl the 60 or 70 who already have quit ATN for SWA) have already indicated their opinion, in writing, that being stapled to the bottom of our list, sitting a year of probation, and buying their own type rating, was superior to what they had at Airtran. What does that tell you? What do you think it tells the rest of the airline world?

There was even several active Airtran pilots in our hiring pool for the 2 years or so we didn't have new-hire classes. They were already hired but waiting. Had SWA not bought ATN, they would have jumped at the chance to start at the bottom like every SWA pilot before them. However, since SWA did buy ATN, when we called for class up, all but one turned it down. They had previously believed it was an opportunity of a lifetime, but now they declined, thinking ALPA could get them more with their hardcore tactics. That sounds less like "fair," and more like "opportunism" to me.

Southwest pilot perspective. Just so you don't wonder why the average SW pilot thinks ALPA MEC turning down the AIP smacked of greed.

Bubba

 

[Bake]

Doesn't seem the "golden rule" is being applied to the pilots of AirTran when the rules of the game are changed in the 2nd quarter. SWA/SWAPA has now decided that they will take their ball and go home if they don't win.

The golden rule is being applied as it is applied to our customers and other employees. To our competion, we will be there when you are in need. When AMR went off the RWY in LIT, SWA flew 2 planes there in support of AMR. During the hurricane of 2005 (???) in HOU. I flew a plane to help out the people of that area at the full expense of SWA. We live the golden rule everyday. When it comes to competition and business, we are all business. In fact, you could say that you are not living by the golden rule by being greedy. Godsmack, Greed is a great song if you are in doubt.

 

[Wolf King]

SWA Bubba, be very careful. oy will start sending you nude photos of him/herself. I puked when I saw 'it'.
He/she is very strange.

Funny, I got one too. He was wrestling a naked midget, not sure which one was the midget....

 

[redflyer65]

But now that the acquisition deal went through, things seem to have changed somewhat. Since ALPA national has assured you that our contract and money are your God-given right
Bubba

Unbelievably accurate Bubba. OYS will never admit defeat though. Heck, he/she doesn't even know the DL seniority list..

RF

 

[redflyer65]

The key phrase is annual profit. Just barely. Since 9/11? That ain't that long ago. Shortly prior to 9/11, people were leaving southwest to go to united. The last wonderkind.

Really? Name another airline that's done better.

 

[SWA Bubba]

e120 pilot,

First, thanks for being civil. I'm not so much trying to push the opinion that SWA is superior, but rather get some of your most vocal posters to see OUR perspective. Their posts seem to think we're stealing from ATN since we don't agree with them (about equality, that is).

And I agree 100% with you about negotiations. This is where -I- feel ALPA was not acting in good faith. Let's talk about the negotiations: SWAPA shows up to the table with the industry-leading contract (in all respects; not just far superior compensation). ALPA shows up to the table with superior seniority (due to a lot of things: younger company, some turnover, etc.) Do you agree with that so far?

Anyway, SWAPA says let's negotiate. We'll trade some of ours for some of yours. Seems fair to me. We've got the money; you've got the seniority. Wait a minute, ALPA says. That's the company's money, not yours. We're entitled to it anyway. But these are our seats, and our seniority, and we want to keep it.

Do you see where I'm going? Either it's SWAPA's contract/money that we earned through years of hard work and negotiation, AND it's ALPA's seniority and seats, and let's make a trade; OR it all belongs to the company, and all us pilots are sitting around with our thumbs up our behinds. Pick one. ALPA can't say, "it's the company's money so you can't trade it, but it's our personal seats and seniority, so we don't have to trade it."

However, that's exactly what ALPA seems to be saying. I realize that's an ALPA national thing, and not necessarily what an average Airtran line pilot may believe. And please see my last post about a significant portion of your pilot group previously asking to be stapled to our list (by applying, that is); but now the same group seems to be demanding equality and their original seniority simply because ALPA says they can. That has nothing to do with "fair." Or negotiating, for that matter.

Thanks for listening and being civil. I really hope you understand that I'm just trying to explain what the view is from our side of the fence.

Bubba

 

[FDJ2]

I would expect that any pilot group in a merger scenario would be treated with respect, not threats and coercion and that a fair process would be followed. If good faith negotiations fail and if SWAPA is confident in their position, present it to an arbitrator. SWAPA should make their best case before the arbitrator and at the end of the day accept the award, integrate the AAI pilots and move on as one pilot group.

Unfortunately, due to fear and hubris, SWAPA has taken a different path, one which will ultimately lead to dysfunction.

 

[Fubijaakr]

Unfortunately, due to fear and hubris, SWAPA has taken a different path, one which will ultimately lead to dysfunction.

Correct. The GLUX example is erroneous. You can't compare a 1900 operator to a 737 operator. The "career expectations" of SWA and AAI pilots are essentially identical...737 CA.

Therefore, the seniority earned at each carrier is also essentially identical.

This SLI merger screams for DoH.

 

[SWA Bubba]

Correct. The GLUX example is erroneous. You can't compare a 1900 operator to a 737 operator. The "career expectations" of SWA and AAI pilots are essentially identical...737 CA.

Therefore, the seniority earned at each carrier is also essentially identical.

This SLI merger screams for DoH.

Have to disagree with you here. The "seat expectations" (i.e. what we actually do and fly to earn a paycheck) may be essentially identical (737 CA), but the "career expectations" (i.e. how well can I provide for my family and retirement, benefits, job security, etc.) are wildly different. There's no one who can debate that in a serious tone. Not even you.

Otherwise how do you explain the massive number of Airtran pilots who wanted to quit and start over at SWA?

And I wasn't really comparing 1900s to 737s. I was illustrating differences. What if GL bought some 737s? THEN, can their four-year CA integrate into your list and contract at his 10% seniority?

What you're doing is changing MY argument to suit what YOU want the facts to be.

Bubba

 

[waveflyer]

Fubi- is it safe to assume that you troll these boards bc you're an older Alaska pilot and if Wn buys you, DOH would be in your best interests?

I'd contend that most WNers joined SWA for more reasons that to be just a "737 capt"- most of us are privileged to be part of the company and culture- but also hitch are wagons to the business model. The business model allows sustainable high pay, not the fact that we use 737s.

So I'd rephrase your career expectation- AT (and you) have the career expectation to be hub and spoke 737 capts in volatile, adversarial environments. And WN has the career expectation of being hybrid point to point 737 capts in a stable, synergistic, mutually productive environment.

IMHO- there's a difference.

But then again- I'm not as socialistic as the average airline pilot. (though I am liberal) And I gave up my number at the legacy where I had 777 career expectations.

And for those calling out Herb and GARY'S honor-- that's ridiculous and you know it- you're just not seeing how ALPA going for every inch they can through their legal rights would ripple through all work groups and multiply. You can't furlough in 2009, and then call out the people who did not despite many of the same challenges. That's just not right. If Herb and GK take a firmer stance with you, that's a pretty good sign that your side is the one messing up. JMO