History has a way of repeating itself:
     WASHINGTON, Sept. 22 /PRNewswire/ -- Four pilots are suing their employer,  Flight Options, LLC, for firing them in retaliation for their union organizing  activities.  They filed a motion for summary judgment against the company in  the Federal District Court in Cleveland, Ohio.  The case is Thomas Bowden, et  al. vs. Flight Options, LLC, Case No. 02-1768.      Their employer, following the merger of Flight Options and Raytheon Travel  Air in March 2002, fired the pilots, Thomas Bowden, William Brunet, Thomas  Jeter and William Tumlin.  Flight Options is now majority-owned by a Raytheon  subsidiary.  The pilots were members of the Raytheon Travel Air union  organizing committee that attempted to unionize the pilots of RTA with the  Teamsters through a campaign that resulted in an election before the National  Mediation Board in January 2002.      "These pilots were leaders in the Teamsters union effort at Raytheon  Travel Air," said Don Treichler, Director of the Teamsters Airline Division.  "They are all skilled, veteran pilots.  Their professionalism cannot be  disputed.  Flight Options' reasons for firing them are completely without  merit.  Discovery in the case has confirmed what we knew -- that these skilled  professionals were fired because they supported the union at Travel Air."      Discovery in the litigation revealed that Flight Options targeted the  pilots for firing.  An e-mail circulated among its managers in March 2002  shows them scheming to manufacture grounds for terminating the plaintiffs and  stating that they needed to change the reasons for firing Bowden because he  had not yet attended an indoctrination session at Flight Options headquarters.  Bowden was not terminated until late June 2002 and the alleged grounds for  discharge did not occur until months after the March 2002 e-mail.      Discovery also uncovered a blacklist of pilots compiled by a Flight  Options manager on which the plaintiffs' names were marked.  Another Flight  Options manager who had been a manager at Travel Air testified that the  employer asked Travel Air managers to identify troublemakers among the Travel  Air pilots and that the plaintiffs' names were marked on that blacklist.      Evidence shows that former Flight Options CEO Kenn Ricci engaged in a  concerted anti-union campaign to defeat the Travel Air union election.  The  campaign involved intelligence gathered on the Teamster organizing effort;  Ricci's monitoring of pilot Internet communications regarding the union;  interrogation by Ricci of pilots about their opinions on the union; and  threads by Ricci regarding what would happen if the union were voted in.  Ricci admitted in a deposition that his anti-union campaign occupied most of  his time following the December 2001 announcement of the merger and leading up  to the January 17, 2002 ballot count.      Evidence also shows Ricci made repeated statements that it was legal for  him to fire pilots for organizing with a union.  An August 2002 e-mail message  by Ricci stated that Flight Options had a policy against hiring pilots from  unionized carriers.      In March 2002, Ricci threatened the pilot who served as the telephone  hotline "Voice of the Union" during the RTA union election that he should not  engage in organizing activity at Flight Options.  That pilot left Flight  Options to take a position at Teamster-represented NetJets.  The evidence  revealed clearly that Flight Options knew the plaintiffs were the union  activists among the Travel Air pilots and that Flight Options was hostile to  union supporters and retaliated against them.      Flight Options asserted unwarranted grounds for the discharge of the  pilots.  Management was unable to produce a single manager who could testify  to the conduct of Jeter and Tumlin that allegedly led to their firing.  Flight  Options managers contradicted themselves as to the reasons for Brunet and  Bowden's terminations.  Two Flight Options managers denied that Brunet engaged  in the conduct during an indoctrination session for which he was allegedly  fired.  Ricci testified that he fired Brunet for "bad body language," but  never discussed the matter with Brunet.  Flight Options asserted four  different stories as to why they fired Bowden -- stories which proved untrue.  The Flight Options e-mail targeting Bowden for termination months prior to any  of these alleged events shows that the company sought any pretext to fire him.      "It is unusual for plaintiffs to seek summary judgment in a lawsuit but  here the evidence is so strong that we think it demands judgment in favor of  the plaintiffs," said the plaintiffs' attorney, William Wilder of Baptiste &  Wilder, P.C. in Washington, D.C.      Flight Options will have until October 15, 2003 to file its response to  the plaintiffs' motion.  The court will likely rule on the motion in November  2003.  Trial is currently set for early December 2003 in Cleveland, Ohio.        Founded in August 1903, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters is  celebrating its 100-year anniversary as a representative and advocate for  working families.