Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

ASA MEC update.

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
BH is the one who needs replaced. It begins at the top. He let CT mismanage the airline. Until SKYW Inc decides to get off their butts and get someone in here to take charge and be responsible for the operation, well, same thing, different day.
 
The reason mgmt is pursuing this new crappy PBS system is it benefits them.

They want OUR contract and YOUR crappy globalized PBS system.

All I know is I've lost most of my patience with these 2 MEC'S. We are arguing about the arrangement of the deck chairs on the Titanic and your MEC wants to keep arguing forever.

I'm done. Let the contracts expire and let the chips fall. I don't care anymore


Well, all I'm saying is that it's gonna cost money and time to get smartpref up and running for parallel bidding. That doesn't make much sense if we are on the titanic. But I agree with your sentiment. Let's just let these things play out. If you are certain of the complete ERJ demise, then you have nothing to worry about.


Uh, yeah. Seems everyone of your posts say the same thing, over and over. Hey but you're persistent, got that going for you.


Well then you didn't understand what I wrote. The assumption that clutch made in his post is wrong.
 
Last edited:
Some of you want to keep the lists separate? That is the worst thing you can do. Bargaining power comes from one large group. Not multiple fractionalized groups. Ignore that at your peril.
 
Some of you want to keep the lists separate? That is the worst thing you can do. Bargaining power comes from one large group. Not multiple fractionalized groups. Ignore that at your peril.

That maybe true, but I don't see these two groups coming together anytime soon. In fact they are getting further apart.
 
To quote the late great Jake Blues, "Well then... I guess you're really up S--- Creek".
 
One contract also means single list. If one side (or the other) is to be downsized, the pilots on the other half will potentially be slaughtered on seniority.
 
No, I've said I'd be willing to take Skywest book and their crappy PBS if it meant one list. This sentiment is not just mine. It's the reason management said shortly after the two MECs voted to send out the TA to vote that they are willing to give us Skywest book but not one list. They didn't just bring that up out of the blue.

Have you really looked into the SKYW work rules? You would be taking a major cut overall. And the one list with them. Look at how PNCL, Mesaba & Colgan list was handled. I think you would come up on the very short end of the stick on that one.
 
Bye bye Nevets!!


Wow, I didn't know I made such an impression on you that you think of me when reading that post. Pretty sad though that you take pleasure in seeing others suffer. But to set you at ease, I can assure you that if this place closed down today, I'll land on my feet and be ok.

Have you really looked into the SKYW work rules? You would be taking a major cut overall. And the one list with them. Look at how PNCL, Mesaba & Colgan list was handled. I think you would come up on the very short end of the stick on that one.


Yes, it would be more of a concession than the TA we voted down. But I would compromise on that and take my chances with the arbitrator. This whipsaw within the holding company needs to end! I'm prepared to put my money where my mouth is because I'm true and honest to my convictions, even if it means a staple.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom