Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

ASA MEC update.

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
You see it that way. We see you as an anchor.


Well, if you see the ERJ contract as an anchor, why don't we just take the PSA deal then?

That's what your way of seeing it is equivalent to, PSAing the ERJ side!
 
The problem is you want one list or nothing. With one list you'd still want your outliers, like the b-fund and be anti-pbs, which are things even the majors don't have any more. So, even if it were one list, we'd still have the same problem because you guys are delusional.
 
Last edited:
What a mistake it was to buy Expressjet. Time to cut them lose. They can take their SmartPref and shove it.
 
The problem is you want one list or nothing. With one list you'd still want your outliers, like the b-fund and be anti-pbs, which are things even the majors don't have any more. So, even if it were one list, we'd still have the same problem because you guys are delusional.


No, I've said I'd be willing to take Skywest book and their crappy PBS if it meant one list. This sentiment is not just mine. It's the reason management said shortly after the two MECs voted to send out the TA to vote that they are willing to give us Skywest book but not one list. They didn't just bring that up out of the blue.


What a mistake it was to buy Expressjet. Time to cut them lose. They can take their SmartPref and shove it.


Yeah, you rather PSA us than to fight for a non-concessionary contract for both sides.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, you rather PSA us than to fight for a non-concessionary contract for both sides.

Yep! Your side trying to shove an inferior globalized PBS system down our throat has made most of us on this side ready to do just that.
 
One List or NOTHING!

If you are talking about one list with SkyWest... I choose nothing. Your company already flushed the profitability of ASA. That was Inc.'s fault for buying your company. I sincerely hope they never merge. The original express jet company seems to be a cancer that's drying up all profitability.
 
Yep! Your side trying to shove an inferior globalized PBS system down our throat has made most of us on this side ready to do just that.


No, there already is an agreed upon process to deal with the PBS issue. It's called the Process Agreement for Interim and Single PBS. What's wrong with a process that both sides have already agreed upon? Why not go with that rather than to PSA us?


I couldn't care less what the hell happens to you guys any more..


Well at least you are honest. I'ts more than what some PSA guys have said.


If you are talking about one list with SkyWest... I choose nothing. Your company already flushed the profitability of ASA. That was Inc.'s fault for buying your company. I sincerely hope they never merge. The original express jet company seems to be a cancer that's drying up all profitability.


No, that was Skywest who negotiated unprofitable CPAs. But yeah, I'm talking about one list for all 3 pilot groups.
 
Last edited:
Says the guy currently flying a concessionary contract.


Thanks to being whipsawed against Skywest pilots. But we did that to ourselves. We weren't trying to PSA anyone. And it is still a better contract than any out there, including yours!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top