Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA Plans Adding 25 International Flights from FLL

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
To be more clear.....we all live in glass houses. In the 80' and 90's CO was guilty of THE worst business practices in history of commercial aviation. Period. You sound like an idiot attacking another pilot group. As is almost always the case, when people start pointing fingers it's real easy to spot hypocrisy in the making.
The reality is we are all just pilots who fly airplanes. All of us can be screwed by a few bad choices by a few people in our respective boardrooms. NONE of us are immune. We should be respecting each other as fellow pilots rather than attacking each other using the decisions our respective management teams make as a way of defining ourselves. Bit of a joke when pilots have overblown hubris because of who they fly for or because they think the fact that their airline is successful that makes them better.
 
Sorry I got so long winded but the "my airline can beat up your airline" crap is getting pretty thick on here. If anyone thinks they are more or less respected because of who they fly for they are fools. It's what you do with the money you earn and the days of you have that count. Not crowing about how wonderful you are because you fly for airline XYZ.
 
Sorry I got so long winded but the "my airline can beat up your airline" crap is getting pretty thick on here. If anyone thinks they are more or less respected because of who they fly for they are fools. It's what you do with the money you earn and the days of you have that count. Not crowing about how wonderful you are because you fly for airline XYZ.

Lubbock, green slips, city of Houston, pizza party, Herb turds. Whatcha got to say about that?

Good post. Too bad it'll be dismissed by the ones who need to have it framed on their nightstand.
 
It's fine we don't share an opinion Andy. Frankly I wish we weren't sharing the same seniority list either. I don't wish you any ill will, but as you well know United is where careers go to die, and I wish this merger was not. SWA sure as hell wouldn't have pulled this off without a change in the City of Houston's feeling toward our airline.

Bubba appreciates you siding with him. However, don't forget that after giving Denver the finger in the 90's, SWA marched right back in in 2006. After United lost airplanes on 911, and the ATSB snubbed you, and after your contract was abrogated and pensions were stolen. That was the perfect invitation for SWA, cause that's what they do. Sh1tty things happen to a legacy and then they appear. If the opposite were true and our airline was stalking the SWA ruins, Herb k would lash himself to the front door of Congress and bawl and complain to high Heaven.

Flopgut, you remind me of a quote from Lincoln:

Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.
 
Sorry I got so long winded but the "my airline can beat up your airline" crap is getting pretty thick on here. If anyone thinks they are more or less respected because of who they fly for they are fools. It's what you do with the money you earn and the days of you have that count. Not crowing about how wonderful you are because you fly for airline XYZ.

Great post Dan. Depending on life/flying experiences some probably figure this out later than others or not at all. I certainly feel like I have had a good run and haven't had any trouble finding the silver linings in an industry that continues to evolve.
 
Dan ,

I do have to say.

Every one of your above post are very well written.

I liked them all, so I could no pick which one to quote :)
 
To be more clear.....we all live in glass houses. In the 80' and 90's CO was guilty of THE worst business practices in history of commercial aviation. Period. You sound like an idiot attacking another pilot group. As is almost always the case, when people start pointing fingers it's real easy to spot hypocrisy in the making.
The reality is we are all just pilots who fly airplanes. All of us can be screwed by a few bad choices by a few people in our respective boardrooms. NONE of us are immune. We should be respecting each other as fellow pilots rather than attacking each other using the decisions our respective management teams make as a way of defining ourselves. Bit of a joke when pilots have overblown hubris because of who they fly for or because they think the fact that their airline is successful that makes them better.

So very true
 
ETOPS program failure? Wrong. We never did anything close to ETOPS proving runs. Why don't you pull up the Flightaware (or anyother software you'd like) that showed us going that far to get signed off on ETOPS. You can't so you just make it up.........so yes, your whole hypothesis is complete BS.

Ahem ...... Are you telling me that a SWA jet never pushed back for an ETOPS attempt with a Fed in the Jumpseat ? Or did you choose the words "proving run" very carefully ?

I agree that none of this is rocket surgery. If AirTran can do international, anybody can. But, there are going to be some amusing incidents - pilots giving WATRS position reports to Miami center whilst in radar contact, and giving in to the sudden urge to use WATRS airspace; Admittedly, it does look quicker on a ND.;)
 
No SWA has not done any ETOPs runs, has AT ever had two flights get violated for Class II airspace deviations in recent history? careful how you answer...
 
You never got close to do the proving runs, but you started working on etops in 2010.

http://aviationblog.dallasnews.com/2010/12/southwest-airlines-looking-for.html/

You do realize that once you receive ETOPS certification you need to use it to keep the authorization active, right? If you don't have any ETOPS destinations in your route structure you aren't able to use it. As Hawaii plans changed so did the need for ETOPS.
From Gary Kelly:

"The final step with the certification we wouldn't do until we're ready to announce Hawaii service. So there's no more preparation we need to do. Once we decide, then we would have to undertake that and have enough time between the announcement and the certification to make sure we're prepared to launch, but there's no reason to do that until we're ready to go."
 
Dan: You say things that sound good, your actions are otherwise [65]. That's the simple truth. Additionally, you have not had to catch the whole SWA act in person. Wait til they find someone who can hold their hand thru etops and they start going to Hawaii. Then tell me how impressed, patient and happy you are as you watch them accumulate political favors you thought weren't possible.

I agree Continental has an awful past. But I think more than any other group, Continental pilots had to eat a mile of sh1t for it. We still do, everyday. As hard as any group of airline employees felt it was to improve their company and their contracts selling against CAL/Lorenzo in the 80s, I think I'd still maybe rather that than sell against an outfit like SWA. Good Lord, they get handed any Texas airport deal they need. They buried Braniff, Transtar and have half buried AirTran. All while whistling zippidy doo da out their a-holes. And, let's all watch closely, because there is going to be more trickery in the route situation with SWA. The way international routes have been awarded for the last 60-70 years isn't going to work for SWA.
 
From Gary Kelly:

"The final step with the certification we wouldn't do until we're ready to announce Hawaii service. So there's no more preparation we need to do. Once we decide, then we would have to undertake that and have enough time between the announcement and the certification to make sure we're prepared to launch, but there's no reason to do that until we're ready to go."

Continued: "and after we get the ETOPS certification, we intend to fly our 737s to the Moon and Pluto, with a tech stop at Uranus....and only RSW's too, sorry trannies.... All aboard! Toot toot!"


Bye Bye---General Lee
 
Last edited:
Dan: You say things that sound good, your actions are otherwise [65]. That's the simple truth. Additionally, you have not had to catch the whole SWA act in person. Wait til they find someone who can hold their hand thru etops and they start going to Hawaii. Then tell me how impressed, patient and happy you are as you watch them accumulate political favors you thought weren't possible.

I agree Continental has an awful past. But I think more than any other group, Continental pilots had to eat a mile of sh1t for it. We still do, everyday. As hard as any group of airline employees felt it was to improve their company and their contracts selling against CAL/Lorenzo in the 80s, I think I'd still maybe rather that than sell against an outfit like SWA. Good Lord, they get handed any Texas airport deal they need. They buried Braniff, Transtar and have half buried AirTran. All while whistling zippidy doo da out their a-holes. And, let's all watch closely, because there is going to be more trickery in the route situation with SWA. The way international routes have been awarded for the last 60-70 years isn't going to work for SWA.
Ooooh!! Please share about the trickery!!! Or will it maybe be standard business negotiations where both parties reap a benefit? I guess if you work for UCAL, fair business deals would seem like some mystical enterprise.
 
Ooooh!! Please share about the trickery!!! Or will it maybe be standard business negotiations where both parties reap a benefit? I guess if you work for UCAL, fair business deals would seem like some mystical enterprise.
Come on scoreboard, you know that there is a double secret set of regulations that only apply to Southwest while every other airline in the country must comply with a completely onerous set of rules that were enacted solely to give SWA an advantage.

Did you miss that day of ground school?
 
Buried Braniff...

Wiki:

That and maybe buying concords to fly subsonic across the US.


...and flying empty 747's all over the place, not having a clue how to handle deregulation, they expanded like wild fire with no thought put into the viability of the routes they flew as they thought deregulation wouldn't last and they wanted as many routes already established as possible, even if they didn't make money.
AA did play a lot of dirty tricks on them, never heard SWA being blamed for their demise though.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top