I guess you could say they had an opportunity to get hired at AT but chose not to or did not meet the requirements."
Once again, these were AAI pilots in a SWA hiring pool, who elected (I don't blame them) to leave the pool after the announcement was made to acq AAI and are higher on the MSL than they would have been if they went to class at SWA with their fellow poolies. The point illustrates that, pre-acq, SWA was a more desirable place to work for some AAI pilots then AAI (hence their decision to interview and be placed in a SWA hiring pool). An earlier poster stated that AAI was a desirable acq target for SWA, that is obvious, but what is also obvious is that some/many AAI pilots wanted jobs at SWA...that is what is truly comical, that AT/ALPA is sueing SWA for the -717 going away early but many of the "victims" felt they would have been better off at SWA pre acq announcement...the AAI jackwagons that undermined SL9 (supported by the career SWA bashers on this forum) play the "we got screwed because Gary lied" argument...what they won't admit is that they had seat/pay/base/furlough protections in SL9 that they rejected because they wanted more (DOH/Relative sen position on the combined list). Then they blinked when GK stated he might get rid of the -717 (or maybe the majority spoke).