Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA/AAI and the flight deck jumpseat

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
That was eloquent humvee- but that's not the point. You said if the SLI doesn't meet your expectations that the whole thing could be a "unlucky" turn of events. ...

Seriously?

Bc that's as ridiculous as any of us saying the same thing. Getting to FLY for one of the most admired companies anywhere AND be well paid is never an unlucky event. Most of us are slugging it out having to fly for the most inept and ridiculous companies to stay in our career. Of which Air Tran was one. Remember you were saving for a strike/

Ty- you are bringing your jobs- but unless you're asking for a fence over them, then you aren't considering that we're bringing a LOT more jobs and a better company who is paying you a LOT more. To be integrated evenly into our jobs is a better benefit to y'all then us gaining access to yours-
Says the guy west of the rockies.
 
That was eloquent humvee- but that's not the point. You said if the SLI doesn't meet your expectations that the whole thing could be a "unlucky" turn of events. ...

Seriously?

Bc that's as ridiculous as any of us saying the same thing. Getting to FLY for one of the most admired companies anywhere AND be well paid is never an unlucky event. Most of us are slugging it out having to fly for the most inept and ridiculous companies to stay in our career. Of which Air Tran was one. Remember you were saving for a strike/

Ty- you are bringing your jobs- but unless you're asking for a fence over them, then you aren't considering that we're bringing a LOT more jobs and a better company who is paying you a LOT more. To be integrated evenly into our jobs is a better benefit to y'all then us gaining access to yours-
Says the guy west of the rockies.

Wave, I'm sure you are painfully aware that I had nothing to do with this acquisition. I know exactly how you guys feel. The view from my foxhole is not that different than your own. It's all about preserving as much bidding power as possible. At the end of the day all any of us want to do is to be able to bid those days off that we need to make our wife/kid happy (well those are my reasons..eveyone has their own). It really doesn't matter if the SLI meets my expectations or not. I'm going to make the best out any situation, because that's how I roll. I got your point though. FWIW, I don't think our strike vote is a valid argument. We were trying to make AirTran a better place. We were trying to help our F/O's. I don't think there is a single airline pilot out there who doesn't understand and respect what that strike vote represented for us and the industry as a whole.
 
I FWIW, I don't think our strike vote is a valid argument. .
FWIW, it is a very valid argument showing the conditions you were working under at the moment of snapshot.

A group who had had enough with their current employer and where willing to job action to get their point across. How can you not see that as relevant?:confused:
 
FWIW, it is a very valid argument showing the conditions you were working under at the moment of snapshot.

A group who had had enough with their current employer and where willing to job action to get their point across. How can you not see that as relevant?:confused:

That's called damned if you do and damned if you don't.
 
I agree with your pilot groups rationale, but your not answering why the strike vote is an invalid argument to show the state of AT pilots employment prospects.

In fact, you are bolstering my point by stating "damned if you do, damned if you don't", that shows you had no other choice and details the conditions you worked under.

So, again, why is the strike vote irrelevant?
 
Last edited:
I agree with your pilot groups rationale, but your not answering why the strike vote is an invalid argument to show the state of AT pilots employment prospects.

I can't believe you wrote this. How much airline industry do you have, outside of SWA?

What about a Fedex job . . . A UPS job, a job at pre-9/11 Delta? Crappy jobs, huh? Must have been. Those pilots took strike votes, too.

The more times you bring it up, the more you look the fool.
 
I think I am just looking at it differently than you are. I am looking at it as an example of our unity and our dedication to make AT a better workplace. You are saying "look how bad it was there". We finally got our act together and took a stand. If you say it's relevant, so be it. It was a pretty defining moment though for a pilot group that had been through alot.
 
Truth is that none of us know what the arbitrators will consider in our situation. It's been said many times here before that every integration is different and brings unique dynamics to play. Will it be pay, longevity, seats, career expectations, future growth, awesome points, etc.? There will be a panel of three and they could all look at different criteria to formulate their decision. In the end they will solve any unresolved issues and we will move on....good, bad or indifferent. At least I will. I assume most others will as well.
 
That was eloquent humvee- but that's not the point. You said if the SLI doesn't meet your expectations that the whole thing could be a "unlucky" turn of events. ...

Seriously?

Bc that's as ridiculous as any of us saying the same thing. Getting to FLY for one of the most admired companies anywhere AND be well paid is never an unlucky event. Most of us are slugging it out having to fly for the most inept and ridiculous companies to stay in our career. Of which Air Tran was one. Remember you were saving for a strike/

Ty- you are bringing your jobs- but unless you're asking for a fence over them, then you aren't considering that we're bringing a LOT more jobs and a better company who is paying you a LOT more. To be integrated evenly into our jobs is a better benefit to y'all then us gaining access to yours-
Says the guy west of the rockies.

There are a few scenarios that could make this an unlucky event for different demographics of our pilot group for different reasons. I guess we are all rediculous to some degree.

As far as bringing jobs to add to the greater number of jobs you already have, to make even more jobs, that's a true statement. However, the "better company that is paying us a lot more" (your words) isn't coming from you as much as the mgmt that has promoted the culture that you enjoy. If it weren't for their mgmt style, you'd be sluggin it out like the rest of us.

It is refreshing to hear some of your own espouse being "lucky" to have been hired by WN. Why is OK for them to be lucky to be hired, but it's a curse for the FL guys to be lucky enough to be bought out by WN? Most of us from both sides of the fence would rather be lucky than good any day :).
 
I can't believe you wrote this. How much airline industry do you have, outside of SWA? more than you tiger, since 79.

What about a Fedex job . . . A UPS job, a job at pre-9/11 Delta? Crappy jobs, huh? Must have been. Those pilots took strike votes, too. And they still work there...

The more times you bring it up, the more you look the fool.
The only fool here is the fulltime property manager playing partime airline pilot.:D

The discussion is why was the strike vote irrelevant, not the state of how sucky or unsucky it was to work. You read to much between the lines. I think it is a relevant point, you don't, we'll see.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top