Lear70
JAFFO
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2003
- Posts
- 7,487
That's pretty dang smart when you think about it. Mollifies the SWA pilot group by still being quickly responsive to complaints, a solution that doesn't irritate one side or another AND that's tax-deductible as a charitable donation.Well SWA just settled the grievance for the "One LUV" medallion on the AT plane on May 2nd for violating Section 1 by donating enough money to purchase a new van in every SWA domicile for the Ronald McDonald House. How many other companies would do that?
The number for me is about $4,500 a month compared to my two SWA buddies who are in my same longevity bracket, pre-tax of course.The monthly number is easily 5-7000/month. I believe the 'across the board' average was 5000 a month when the numbers were crunched.
Actually, that IS a staple. You just said "AAI FO's at the bottom of the combined list". That's a staple for over half our pilots.What would it take for most SWAPA pilots to agree to a negotiated SLI?
I think it would be something like this..AAI FO's at the bottom of the combined list (hopefully holding full longevity for pay), AAI CA's ratioed in off the bottom of the SW list. The unknowns would be..
Fences and possible pay protection. And possibly the AAI CA's retaining the left seat but with a reduction in longevity going forward. There are a ton of different ways to get it done, but anything less palitable on the SW side would most likely get it sent to arbitration.
In the end, no staple and no DOH.
That said, our MC would never send something like that to the MEC for vote, nor would the MEC put it out for vote (I've spoken first-hand with enough reps to know how they feel about anything approaching that kind of scenario). But it's interesting to hear what you guys would find "acceptable", and that's why I fear there's little that can be done to keep this from arbitration, as we would find something like that "unacceptable".
And your first paragraph in this quote is why. On one hand you want to discuss scenarios, but then you deliberately antagonize our pilots with something that threatens their entire LIFE as an airline pilot.Bad arbitration award in the eyes of Gary/SWAPA, the slow wind down of Guadolupe would probably follow over the next couple of years ala Muse Air.
Just my two cents. No one on here has had the cajones to throw out an actual scenario. Discuss.
How, in anyone's right mind, would you think you'd get positive debate after being so personally aggressive? It's not about whether we find that scenario possible (we don't), it's about antagonizing someone when you say you want to discuss something. You can't threaten someone then expect them to calmly and politely debate your topic.