Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Asa pbs ta

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I said the same thing about our current contract.... wait...get informed....ask questions....Give it a chance. I listened, I asked questions. You see the turd we ended up with. It is SO full of loopholes.

And how did you vote on the contract?
 
Ok, Someone answer this simple question. Where does the money the company saves from pbs come from? Our pockets or theirs?
 
Ok, Someone answer this simple question. Where does the money the company saves from pbs come from? Our pockets or theirs?

It comes from lower expenses that will in turn help us secure more flying in a very competitive environment...It is a fairly painless way to save the company money....We can either compete, or we can continue to shrink....Your choice....
 
Come on you can say it JP, PAY CUT. The company has lower expenses from a lower payroll cost. Still won't compete with mesa or peenuckle.
 
Come on you can say it JP, PAY CUT. The company has lower expenses from a lower payroll cost. Still won't compete with mesa or peenuckle.

You think I am Pennekamp....Now that's funny...

We can either compete or we can ignore market realities....If you choose the latter....you better get the phone number for truck masters.
 
Sorry Joe, meant JM. I just don't understand why so many people are willing to give up money to save the company when it never works. They just come back for more and more. Have we not learned anything from our past or others. Do you really think the money saved will get us more flying or will it be "Sorry we tried but just missed it but keep up the great work, we just need to cut cost a little more. Details on that next week".
 
Part of it comes from the pockets of the pilots they don't have to hire to cover new flying, if we ever get any.
I'll give you that, they won't have to bring back the furloughs "IF" we get more flying. But will you admit that most of it comes in less paid out to current pilots?
 
especially given PBR's theory on management and contracts (provided you buy into that theory)......
Ok,
The black helicopters are still outside my windows. I can say with absolute certainty that Ford and Harrison LLC was on retainer during the last 3 union drives and advised BH and JA directly. I would assume they are still on retainer, and BH can access them anytime. If you don't think your contract is under the microscope over at the F&H bunker, looking for any weak points, you are delusional. Can you name ANY, repeat ANY, pilot group, union or not that has had any QOL increase in the last 8 years? Now list every pilot group that has had their junk sliced off and handed to them in a paper bag. I am gonna bet the "junk in a bag group" is larger.
Good luck!
PBR
 
Ok,
The black helicopters are still outside my windows. I can say with absolute certainty that Ford and Harrison LLC was on retainer during the last 3 union drives and advised BH and JA directly. I would assume they are still on retainer, and BH can access them anytime. If you don't think your contract is under the microscope over at the F&H bunker, looking for any weak points, you are delusional. Can you name ANY, repeat ANY, pilot group, union or not that has had any QOL increase in the last 8 years? Now list every pilot group that has had their junk sliced off and handed to them in a paper bag. I am gonna bet the "junk in a bag group" is larger.
Good luck!
PBR
And this time it is up to us to vote to cut off our own junk and gift wrap it before we hand it over.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top