Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Will NWA and the Mechs agree?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dizel8
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 35

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
WillowRunVortex said:
Inform your step-mother of this:

"First and foremost, our Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) contains no provision which expressly prohibits Flight Attendants from supporting our fellow employees by engaging in a work stoppage, with the exception of Letter of Agreement 2 which requires the continuation of military flights in the event of a labor dispute. PFAA and its legal counsel firmly believe that, contrary to company statements to the media and in employee communications, the Flight Attendants do have a legal right, both under our contract and Federal law, to honor another Unions picket line."

Well, all I have to say is that with management's track record, they will hold to their word and send those FA's packin' that don't show up for work. They obviously don't care about CBA's as evident by this week's Champion flying. They'll fire some FA's over this deal and worry about it later in the grievence process. So, its really gonna put the FA's in a bad spot if they are told from PFAA to not to go work, and then they are informed by NW that they are no longer employed.
 
Workin'Stiff said:
Well, all I have to say is that with management's track record, they will hold to their word and send those FA's packin' that don't show up for work. They obviously don't care about CBA's as evident by this week's Champion flying. They'll fire some FA's over this deal and worry about it later in the grievence process. So, its really gonna put the FA's in a bad spot if they are told from PFAA to not to go work, and then they are informed by NW that they are no longer employed.

The PFAA membership is solid,,,management cannot send them all "packing". They have 1200 replacements trained. It takes 10,000 to run the airline. Your tone is typical NWA ALPA. Look where their "cooperation" with management got them.
 
schafjet said:
WorkinStiff,

The union won't give and inch? What about the management team?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This is ridiculous, it was just reported in the MSP paper that the top 4 executives just got a bonus of about $1.something million in stock options. Granted, the stock isn't worth much but it could be if things work out.

Also, there are other variables at work here too. Teamsters just announced that they will honor the picket line. So UPS and other teamsters will not be throwing any Cargo business or other business to NWA. That will hurt them.

Lastly, NWA pissed off the only union they had on their side. The pilots union was encouraging all unions to do their share of cuts. So what does NWA do to thank them for their support? They go and use Champion Air to fly NWA passengers on NWA routes, a clear violation of ALPA's NWA's contract (I believe that is in regards to scope). So now the pilots are thinking a little more about sympathy and not crossing the picket line.

Steeland is getting some bad advice from somewhere, but that's typical. I have lived here in MSP for almost all my life and NWA has never, ever had a good working relationship with its employees.

Oh, by the way. I don't work for NWA. So I don't have an ax to grind. I just think it is terrible how they treat their employees and the traveling public for that matter.

To answer the first question. I don't think there will be a settlement. There is just too much bad blood on both sides of the table.

I totally agree with you. It's really a bad deal. And yes, both side are to the point where its even fruitless to talk. Management won't budge from the $176m in savings from AMFA and I just read in the WSJ yesterday that the president of AMFA is standing firmly on the thought that NW mech's should be getting paid $100k. Now, there is just too much of a span there for even the most optimistic person to believe that middle-ground can be found.
 
WillowRunVortex said:
The PFAA membership is solid,,,management cannot send them all "packing". They have 1200 replacements trained. It takes 10,000 to run the airline. Your tone is typical NWA ALPA. Look where their "cooperation" with management got them.

I just happen to be alittle more of a realist. That's all. And frankly, from my perspective, I don't see the PFAA membership as solid as you might. I know that the 1200 replacements cannot run the airline. However, it's also unrealistic to think that every single one of the card-holding FA's will walk. How many will cross?? I have no idea. Mangement knows this, hence the reason for the scare tactic thats being placed on the phone and in the mailboxes. Maybe their goal is to incite as many as possible to cross that line if need be...
 
Workin'Stiff said:
Management won't budge from the $176m in savings from AMFA and I just read in the WSJ yesterday that the president of AMFA is standing firmly on the thought that NW mech's should be getting paid $100k. Now, there is just too much of a span there for even the most optimistic person to believe that middle-ground can be found.

Workin, I just want to clarify with you the fact that NWA management wants a 53% permanent reduction in mechanics ranks. You sound as if both parties are being unreasonable. The only choice (as of now) for the mech's is a yes or no for the elimination of more than half their work force! How could anyone vote yes to this?

Explain...
 
Last edited:
Yes, both parties are being unreasonable. Yes, it is outrageous that management wants/needs to cut 53% of the AMFA workforce. And yes, it is outrageous that AMFA believes that mechanics should be paid $100K. There are many sides to an argument.

I don't envy the decisions that both the mechanics and managment have to make. Mechanics are potentially deciding on their employment future. Managment is deciding on the employment future of roughly 40,000 employees worldwide. There are a lot of issues on both parties shoulders; all making those decisions they have to make all that more difficult.
 
Workin'Stiff said:
Yes, both parties are being unreasonable. Yes, it is outrageous that management wants/needs to cut 53% of the AMFA workforce. And yes, it is outrageous that AMFA believes that mechanics should be paid $100K. There are many sides to an argument.

.

You are mixing apples and oranges. It is irrelevant what one "thinks" an NWA mechanic should be paid. The AMFA's OFFICIAL position in the negotiations is $143 million in concessions. This is not unreasonable. This is only 36 million from what NWA management wants but wont BUDGE on. 36 million (per year) relatively speaking, is the difference from everyone taxiing on 2 engines instead of one. A DAY! I can already see that the problem at NWA is the employees dont know/have the facts.
 
Last edited:
Workin'Stiff

I don't know where you got 100k, I think you said the WSJ. However, I think the mechanics are saying they "should" be payed 100k. They are in fact putting a concessionary contract on the table and not "asking" for 100k. So, they are not trying to negotiate for 100k. I think I "should" make what a pro ball player makes, but I'm not getting that and my union is not negotiating that either. What you want and what you get are two different things. You get what you negotiate, not what you want. Big difference.
 
You know what, you're right, you always will be right. I'm going to find something alittle more productive to do with my day than bicker with you.

WillowRunVortex said:
I can already see that the problem at NWA is the employees dont know/have the facts.

But this is where you're wrong. I'm with Mesaba.
 
Workin'Stiff

It's okay, we know what you meant ;) Thanks for correcting yourself. It takes a big person to do that, espescially on this forum.
 
schafjet said:
Workin'Stiff

It's okay, we know what you meant ;) Thanks for correcting yourself. It takes a big person to do that, espescially on this forum.

Yeah thanks workin,

I know I sound worked up, I apologize too. I am worked up. I think everyone is very frustrated with NWA management right now, and it shows.
 
I posted this once but didn't get an answer.....

Is NWA contractually prohibited from just fuloughing mechanics?

If not, why doesn't the company just start doing that. I find it hard to believe that manangement HAS to have both...meaning both pay cuts and 2000 layoffs...

what's going on that I'm missing?
 
ultrarunner said:
I posted this once but didn't get an answer.....

Is NWA contractually prohibited from just fuloughing mechanics?

If not, why doesn't the company just start doing that. I find it hard to believe that manangement HAS to have both...meaning both pay cuts and 2000 layoffs...

what's going on that I'm missing?

Because they are at their minimum staffing levels now. They want to fire 53% of the AMFA mech's and outsource that level to third party vendors at cheaper rates.

Also,

In reality they want to do away with the AMFA period. That is why they will not budge.

Thirdly it is their quickest way into BK if the AMFA strikes. This is what management wants so it can quickly take care of the PFAA,,,and eventually go back to the pilots and rape them.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom