netjetwife
1 of many w/an opinion
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2004
- Posts
- 2,741
Misunderstood again...
On another issue, I have a difference of opinion. Snake said, "Again, it doesn't matter to ANY OWNER at Nutjets how much we are paid...AND IT SHOULDN'T!"
I strongly disagree, for several reasons. The company has been lying to the owners by telling them that they had to raise prices to cover pilot salary increases, which the pilots did NOT receive. Wages are directly tied to the level of experience which the company will be able to attract and retain among its pilot force. Lack of experience has historically been linked to accidents. Pilots on strike for higher wages and a better contract WOULD impact the owners. Any sign of mismanagement, labor problems included, should be a concern to anyone with a financial investment in the company, including a share of an airplane. Then there is the question of basic fairness--do the owners think that it is right that their pilot is paid less than their limo driver? Will the wealthy be embarrassed if it becomes public knowledge that some of their pilots are receiving government assistance? Will the famous owners' reputations be tarnished when it comes out that many of their pilots are paid less than bus drivers and garbage collectors, just to name a few? If none of the above reasons matter to the owners, then the one mentioned in Live4flying's post definitely should. He advised the owners to ask if the flightcrew was well rested. We all know that the payscale is not the only part of a contract. The owners have a vested interest in the work rules that govern the conditions under which their pilots are working. They have every right to expect a rested, alert crew, rather than one that is fighting fatigue and has been grabbing nourishment when they could. 14 hour days and missed meals are not conducive to safety--that fact alone SHOULD concern the owners.
Owner, I am quoting myself to point out to you that I did not request a tip for my husband. I was simply trying to make the most of the opportunity of "speaking" to one of the owners, by asking about some of those issues that I have been curious about. You guys turned one of three questions into a plea and ignored the other two. My comments/guidelines on tipping were meant to help those owners that WANT to show their appreciation in that manner, if you are not in that group, owner, than by all means, do not tip the flightcrew. My advice (passed on from my husband) to make the tip reflect the difficulty of the flight refers only to those conditions obvious to the owner. Simply a suggestion that the owners that WANT TO TIP could look out the window and decide if it's going to be a good weather or bad weather tip for the pilots.netjetwife said:NJAowner, what is your position on tipping the pilots? Would you be embarrassed if it became public knowledge that one of your flight crew receives government assistance? Do you find it misleading to be told that there are two captains in every plane, when in reality there is one captain and one first officer that is forced to have a captain's rating but is paid much less than some of the limo drivers? I have no problem believing that you are an owner, as I truly am a wife.
Netjetwife
On another issue, I have a difference of opinion. Snake said, "Again, it doesn't matter to ANY OWNER at Nutjets how much we are paid...AND IT SHOULDN'T!"
I strongly disagree, for several reasons. The company has been lying to the owners by telling them that they had to raise prices to cover pilot salary increases, which the pilots did NOT receive. Wages are directly tied to the level of experience which the company will be able to attract and retain among its pilot force. Lack of experience has historically been linked to accidents. Pilots on strike for higher wages and a better contract WOULD impact the owners. Any sign of mismanagement, labor problems included, should be a concern to anyone with a financial investment in the company, including a share of an airplane. Then there is the question of basic fairness--do the owners think that it is right that their pilot is paid less than their limo driver? Will the wealthy be embarrassed if it becomes public knowledge that some of their pilots are receiving government assistance? Will the famous owners' reputations be tarnished when it comes out that many of their pilots are paid less than bus drivers and garbage collectors, just to name a few? If none of the above reasons matter to the owners, then the one mentioned in Live4flying's post definitely should. He advised the owners to ask if the flightcrew was well rested. We all know that the payscale is not the only part of a contract. The owners have a vested interest in the work rules that govern the conditions under which their pilots are working. They have every right to expect a rested, alert crew, rather than one that is fighting fatigue and has been grabbing nourishment when they could. 14 hour days and missed meals are not conducive to safety--that fact alone SHOULD concern the owners.