US Airways to hire

[charlie2]

To put the coming retirements, my 5 plus years on furlough and the age 65 stagnation discussion a differant way, I was hired over 12 years ago and the new hires we'll get next year will be only a few hundred numbers junior to me meaning you'll transition and/or upgrade like someone with twelve years longevity. There will be next year new hires that will upgrade before me. My choice of course I like a better schedule than more pay.

 

[becket]

To put the coming retirements, my 5 plus years on furlough and the age 65 stagnation discussion a differant way, I was hired over 12 years ago and the new hires we'll get next year will be only a few hundred numbers junior to me meaning you'll transition and/or upgrade like someone with twelve years longevity. There will be next year new hires that will upgrade before me. My choice of course I like a better schedule than more pay.

If anybody should have learned "not to count their chickens" it's any us air pilot hired after 1987.

 

[charlie2]

If anybody should have learned "not to count their chickens" it's any us air pilot hired after 1987.

Very true...but absent another force majour event they will have to replace every retiring pilot.

 

[Lampshade]

Retirements - East (active), West (active), Total, Active (age 65 only)
2013 - 158 (109), 48 (33), 206, 142
2014 - 206 (155), 43 (38), 249, 193
2015 - 183 (142), 54 (41), 237, 183
2016 - 223 (171), 48 (41), 271, 212
2017 - 237 (181), 64 (47), 301, 228
2018 - 254 (204), 52 (47), 306, 251
2019 - 256 (201), 76 (65), 332, 266
2020 - 240 (195), 67 (56), 307, 251
2021 - 246 (175), 67 (57), 313, 232
2022 - 201 (161), 66 (55), 267, 216
Totals - 2204 (1694), 585 (480), 2789, 2174

If you look at the chart above you can see that Weasel Lips is full of it.

To get up to around 50 percentile on the east would require you to move up 1400 positions for a new hire on the east, thats around year 2020.

 

[Hpilot]

If anybody should have learned "not to count their chickens" it's any us air pilot hired after 1987.

Comon mannn. Why count your chickens when you can steeeaaaalll them

 

[get2flyin]

Retirements - East (active), West (active), Total, Active (age 65 only)
2013 - 158 (109), 48 (33), 206, 142
2014 - 206 (155), 43 (38), 249, 193
2015 - 183 (142), 54 (41), 237, 183
2016 - 223 (171), 48 (41), 271, 212
2017 - 237 (181), 64 (47), 301, 228
2018 - 254 (204), 52 (47), 306, 251
2019 - 256 (201), 76 (65), 332, 266
2020 - 240 (195), 67 (56), 307, 251
2021 - 246 (175), 67 (57), 313, 232
2022 - 201 (161), 66 (55), 267, 216
Totals - 2204 (1694), 585 (480), 2789, 2174

If you look at the chart above you can see that Weasel Lips is full of it.

To get up to around 50 percentile on the east would require you to move up 1400 positions for a new hire on the east, thats around year 2020.

Lamp, Knock it off with the "facts". You know damn well we prefer baseless flame-bait. We don't have time for your ACTUAL data. I'm not going to ask you again.

 

[MCDU]

Half way up the list in 8 years only including mandatory retirements is as good as it gets. East will remain separate. If you get hired at 27, you will be half way up the list by 35.
Enjoy the dry heat

M

 

[becket]

Half way up the list in 8 years only including mandatory retirements is as good as it gets. East will remain separate. If you get hired at 27, you will be half way up the list by 35.
Enjoy the dry heat

M

Sorry mcdoodie, most of the Easties are at their breaking point with loa93. The CLT crew news desperation is borderline embarrassing. When a fed. Judge tells the company they're liable to the west, the first contract proposal will pass and this whole wasted effort will be over.

 

[Snaab]

Thank you for the candid responses with respect to wages and upward movement in the coming years.

 

[charlie2]

Sorry mcdoodie, most of the Easties are at their breaking point with loa93. The CLT crew news desperation is borderline embarrassing. When a fed. Judge tells the company they're liable to the west, the first contract proposal will pass and this whole wasted effort will be over.

Sure wish there was a way we could wager on this on FI.com! The company wants the judge to tell them the west can or can not sue them if they accept anything other than the nic if I understand it right and I bet the judge will basically decide he can't make that call. The company is liable to USAPA and USAPA is liable to the west pilots so your only recourse is DFR II against USAPA and only USAPA. But I've been wrong before.