United

[100LL... Again!]

I've heard a lot of talk about a national union, (bar association...whatever). I may be wrong, but I think that is what the ship captains (as in ocean vessels) did to protect their jobs. The only thing they got for it, now most ships are registered in foreign countrys to avoid them. And our laws may not allow this for airplanes now, but if push came to shove, powerfull lobbyists could get that changed.

I respectfully disagree. I think that it was the demands of union crews (who are much further down on the skill/knowledge scale than captains), who drove the costs too high.

I think the industry would have been able to support high CA salaries, but not extra-high unskilled CREW salaries.

Example: An airline MIGHT be able to aford good pilot salaries, but why is the bag-thrower making $20/hr? THAT job can be replace by non-union workers.

Anyone can learn to throw bags in a week.

 

[100LL... Again!]

So whose fault is all this?

Answer - everyone's fault.

The a-holes for being a-holes. The indifferent for being indifferent.
Those who took silent glee in the demise of others because they (in their insecurity) wanted to feel better about themselves.

ALPA's total failure to create real unity, coupled with the selfishness of the individual pilot groups has brought this on ourselves.

In truth, even though it does not seem that the profession deserves it, we really do.

The arrogance of mainline pilots who have no problem with "prop trash" making peanuts, the regional guys who thrill at the transfer of mainline jobs to the codeshare partners, scabs (the real kind).

Ultimately, it is the responsibility of those 'at the top" to be leaders. Impoverished regional pilots had no clout with anyone. Yes, we could have refused to take regional jets, but some other regional would have taken them anyway.

ALPA and the mainline unions had their chance to create real unity in the profession. They had the funds and the political clout.

Instead of using their negotiating capital to ensure that the profession would have been TRULY protected, they gambled.

They gambled that they could put their competitors under, or they gambled that things would always stay at status quo, they gambled on scope language (a paper promise).

Ultimately, those in a position to lead did not lead.

So, here we are now.

 

[AA717driver]

It amazes me when everyone forgets what happened in the past, and starts to spout off nothing but ill informed retoric about how the rest of the industry was standing by "salïvaitng" over how much better their lives were going to be at someone's elses expense.
Get a grip boy's. And stop hating the rest of the industry for your percieved ills.
We all get a good screwing now and then, hopefully its from our wives/girlfriends. Unfortunatly for the last few years the whole profession worldwide took a hit.

"It's pretty much a fact of life, pilots will eat their young and step over the corpse of a dead airline to improve their own lot in life."

Thats a sad quote, get some help dude.

Airbusnut I saw this for myself. You are the one who has no clue. For 15 years, those of us at the "bottom feeders" endured snide comments every time we rode an OAL jumpseat (except for SWA). That IS a fact. My friend in the COS C-130 unit actually had squadron mates from UAL who said to his face "why don't you guys do the right thing and go out of business". That IS a fact. My ex-TWA friend who left for UAL in '92 told me of the comments he endured from UAL lifers while he and the former PAA F/E's sat back and just smiled, knowing this day might come and no one was immune.

You don't remember those things because it didn't affect you. I'll bet you remember the comments some have made about UAL going out of business for the "good of the industry" for a LONG time.

Taking a screwing means getting extended on a trip or having your long LAS layover turned into a 10 hour EWR layover. Getting your career destroyed and your pension stolen is a little harder to brush off.

The bottom line is that these types of attitudes have existed for a very long time and they exist today so you'd just better get used to it. We both know where the word "sympathy" resides in the dictionary.TC

 

[Airbusnut1]

AA717 I say again you are a fool.
And no I do not fly for UAL

 

[G4G5]

SKYkid

I don't really see that happening. IMHO what you will see is grandfathering. At many large fortune 100 companies like IBM and Time Warner, they have grandfathered the employees on the property with the traditional retirement programs. Then any new employees hired after X date are enrolled in the new 401k, non defined benifit plans. Large union labor controlled companies like GM can't just tell the UAW that they are no longer going to fund their retirements, "here's your new plan". But they can offer an alternative that will effect only future employees. Could UAL have dropped their pensions on the PBGC back in 2000?

What congress and the senate are trying to do is having to avoid a federal bail out of the PBGC. You may feel that the bill passed by congress has no teeth, that's your opinion. From the take of the Morningstar author I get the feeling it has teeth, he even go so far as to mention the 10/2005 date when the bill would become law. We will have to wait and see. MY guess is that the congress and the senate will pass the bill. What are the options? Every company in the US would/could transfer their pension liabilities to the PBGC? I don't think so. If they don't pass the law, how long do you think it would take before NWA, DAL, AA, GM, Ford, yada yada dumped their plans too?

Your take on the revenue generated by UAL is not valid becasue, their is a finite number of passengers and if UAL is not there, those pax and their tax revenue will just shift to a different carrier. If GM dies tomorrow people will not stop driving or buying cars. IF UAL goes away tomorrow people will not stop flying. The jobs transfer to a different company (toyota in kentucky, BMW in GSP, Hundai in AL). The only thing that changes is the name on the top of the paycheck. The tax revenue will just come from a different carrier/company. In fact one could argue that letting the financialy viable companies prosper without the burden of the industry having to support the UAL and USAir's of the world would be in everyones best interest. Not the other way around

 

[G4G5]

AA717 I say again you are a fool.
And no I do not fly for UAL

No you are the fool, A717 speaks the truth.

 

[skykid]

You may feel that the bill passed by congress has no teeth, that's your opinion. From the take of the Morningstar author I get the feeling it has teeth, he even go so far as to mention the 10/2005 date when the bill would become law.

I don't think you understand where the PBGCs money come from. I tell you what, I prohibit G4G5 from spending any of my money for the next fiscal year starting in October. Not going to affect you is it? The House bill states the PBGC can't use federal funds from next year's budget for United pensions. Okay, done.

IF UAL goes away tomorrow people will not stop flying. The jobs transfer to a different company (toyota in kentucky, BMW in GSP, Hundai in AL). The only thing that changes is the name on the top of the paycheck.

Yep, I heard JetBlue was going to pick up the Vietnam flights. Fact is, a bunch of flying will go to foreign carriers and we will never see it again.

 

[B6Driver]

Airbusnut1,
I to was there and heard to many comments myself.
You are the clueless one on this run. United has no one to blame but themselves. Greed was not good for them, the price was too high to pay. Now they'll pay forever.

 

[jbDC9]

"It's pretty much a fact of life, pilots will eat their young and step over the corpse of a dead airline to improve their own lot in life."

Thats a sad quote, get some help dude.

Thanks for the vote of confidence Mr Wizard. And no thanks, don't need any help.

Did you even read Boeingman's comments on the previous pages regarding the UAL guys looking down their noses at CAL pilots and trying to bury them? You gonna say that never happened? Get a clue.

And you call AA717 a fool? Nice...

 

[AA717driver]

Yep, I heard JetBlue was going to pick up the Vietnam flights. Fact is, a bunch of flying will go to foreign carriers and we will never see it again.

I believe a lot of international flying will eventually be done by non-U.S. carriers. Are we to establish "Natiional carriers" again? Should we embark on the protectionism as the rest of the world is opening their doors to business? TWA, PanAm and UAL used to have intra-Europe flying. Now, EasyJet does that. If any of the U.S. carriers could have become as effecient as EasyJet or Ryannair, they would still be plying the skies between Rome and Paris.

JetBlue can't fly to VN today but it's not exactly like going to the moon. ATA has been flying all over the world for a couple of decades. I'm sitting in Mumbai, India right now. It was a no-brainer getting here.

It doesn't take a UAL or AA to fly international. If JB or Air Vietnam can do it cheaper, they will take market share from the less effecient carriers regardless of their history and previous stature in the U.S. airline business. The world has shrunk and those who fail to keep up will go by the wayside.

Good luck.TC

 

[Dangerkitty]

AA717 I say again you are a fool.
And no I do not fly for UAL

Airbusnut1,

I suggest you quit while you are way way behind. AA717 has made you his bitch time and time again and yet you still come back for more. Quit bringing a knife to a gun fight. You are out-matched and you cannot win.

And FWIW me being a Native AA'er and AA717 being from TWA I have disagreed with him on many many many things. HOWEVER, he aint know fool and you can't compete in any debate with him

You have been schooled. Go home junior.

 

[aa73]

Airbusnut1,

I suggest you quit while you are way way behind. AA717 has made you his bitch time and time again and yet you still come back for more. Quit bringing a knife to a gun fight. You are out-matched and you cannot win.

And FWIW me being a Native AA'er and AA717 being from TWA I have disagreed with him on many many many things. HOWEVER, he aint know fool and you can't compete in any debate with him

You have been schooled. Go home junior.

From another "native", Airbusnut, you did indeed lose this debate.

Well said TC. OK, back to arguing!

 

[koko nw]

It doesn't take a UAL or AA to fly international. If JB or Air Vietnam can do it cheaper, they will take market share from the less effecient carriers regardless of their history and previous stature in the U.S. airline business. The world has shrunk and those who fail to keep up will go by the wayside.

Good luck.TC[/QUOTE]

How CHEAP/EFFECIENT are you willing too go? There's a certain standard of living most americans are accustomed too. If keeping up and competing against Air Vietnam means living off of Air Vietnam wages....are you willing?


I don't have the answers, but this continual slide has got to stop somewhere.
If not, your going to see Air Vietnam, Nigeria, you name it they'll fly there for pennies against our dollars...

If that's your efficient future....

Cheers

 

[AA717driver]

Thanks, kitty and aa73... Now, back to our regularly scheduled pi$$ing contest!

koko nw--I'm not advocating flying for pennies, that's just what is happening now. On my current swing through Asia and India, there are startups everywhere. Same for Europe. It's not so much that they are paying low wages to pilots (I believe they are paying LCC market rates based on that particular country's standard of living) but overall labor costs are really low.

Pay will have to rise in these emerging markets. The big story yesterday was that there will be a shortfall of around 3,000 pilots in India alone in the next few years. Jobs are available in Asia--Air VN, Air Asia, Dragonair... If you don't mind living over here, you will have work.TC

 

[koko nw]

AA717....No argument here in regards to job's available elsewhere. I personally choose not to pursue them.
I've flown oversea's for the last 18 years and lived abroad on and off for 12, and can say with a degree of certainty, most people would have no idea the hardships involved.

Ran into an ex-pat from Canada for instance with a 3 year contract with I believe Malaysian Airlines in Kuala Lumpur....Very happy to have a job but at the same time counting the day's until he could get a job back home. Dealing with a built in language barrier and customs can quickly ostrasize (sp) you from your "co-workers" on and off the job.

Computers, clothes, toy's...you name it, it's being produced somewhere else, more efficiently and much much cheaper. It's just not our industry. But I digress, I'll stick my head back into the sand and wish it all away

By the way, pretty cool flying you got yourself into. I'm jealous.

Enjoy your layovers.

cheers