Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

UAL MEC tough stance on Scope---keep it up!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Again, how are you harmed.. you just seem mad becasue you feel someone is getting something by you.... you will always have seniority over the RJ CA.......

A ha! There's the fallacy in your argument. I don't feel that someone is getting something by me because your perverted utopian ideals will never happen. The world isn't fair. Deal with it. I risked my family's financial future by resigning my seniority number at my previous carrier and starting over at the bottome (seniority AND pay). All of you regional guys can buck up and do the same thing. Stop asking for handouts because this ain't the Salvation Army.
 
A ha! There's the fallacy in your argument. I don't feel that someone is getting something by me because your perverted utopian ideals will never happen. The world isn't fair. Deal with it. I risked my family's financial future by resigning my seniority number at my previous carrier and starting over at the bottome (seniority AND pay). All of you regional guys can buck up and do the same thing. Stop asking for handouts because this ain't the Salvation Army.

Rez isn't a regional pilot anymore...He is furloughed mainline...He is trying to patch the leaks in the ALPA liferaft....

You have expressed perfectly why ALPA will fail....You do what you need to do and I will do what I need to do...We aren't in the same liferaft.....

This isn't the Salvation Army...It's every man for themselves.....
 
Actually, the time to turn the ship around was 15 years ago....Now that you have hit the iceberg you want to turn the ship around....too late...We can rearrange the chairs on the deck if you would like, but it's far too late to turn the ship around....


Well Joe, I think that you are speaking through emotions, and accepting the notion that it's too late is just , giving up.

We, Pilots must change the way that we negotiate our contracts. For example, ALPA contract negotiations have never used a high power, "Wall Street" firm to negotiate a pilot contract. Why not ? 'cause that's the way they have always done it.

I am sure that your airline doesn't ask for employee volunteers, who want to go to a two week negotiating school, and negotiate their next pilot contract. All airlines hire a high power firm to handle their negotiations, that's why pilots keep loosing ground with every trip to the pattern bargaining table.

The status quo no longer works, and with the economy on an upswing, now is the time to change the way we do things.
 
The flying comes back when the feeder contract expires. When does the first one happen? Two years, four? There is plenty of time to position for interviews, moves if you don't want to commute and generally get adjusted for the change. You guys are debating as if every regional pilot will be on the street at the same moment. Nobody is factoring in the retirements that start in a couple of years either. Change is coming in life whether you like it or not. Rez, I appreciate your concern, but what you propose is an impracticality. Start planning now people!
 
To be clear....I totally agree with the stance that outsoucing has totally screwed this industry up. What was once a small feed on C402's bringing people to catch big jets has morphed into this mess where there are multiple companies flying around in jets with the same logo on their tail. Divide and conquer at its best. ALL flying within a brand should be done by pilots of that brand. If you buy a ticket on a particular airline, THAT airline should have to fly you (barring cancellations causing rebooking on another airline) to whereever it is you are going. Its about responsibility to your customers who believe they bought a ticket on your airline.......That should have been the outcome of the Buffalo crash.....instead we got a bunch of ragtag new rest rules that'll only serve to take more cash from our pockets when our schedules become less productive.
But again, we wanted to do this years ago. Now Expressjets been spun off, BOUNCED from the MEC (and we were bounced, no doubt).....I should have to reapply to fly the same damn RJ I've been flying for 10 years? Please. I'm fine with a staple job but if you think for one minute I'm going to let my job (the one YOU guys gave me by not making sure these EMB's were on CAL property to begin with) go without a fight, your nuts.

This was your doing, not ours. But my kids not going to starve because I had to reinterview for my E145 job and now I'm a first year FO makin 19 bucks an hour. If you don't think as ALPA pilots you have a responsibilty to ME, also an ALPA pilot....you got another thing coming.
 
their own choice. If the regional pilots lose thier job because of scope returns it will not be their choice...



for every pilot...


Not sure where you factor in risk... again the regional pilots lose thier jobs not at their own doing... you seem to not grasp this...



Again... what do you say to the ALPA pilots who are furloughed becuase of scope reversal? So sad too bad? Why? Just cuz?

Rez,

You still have not answered my question! Who will pay for your idea to happen? Management will surely want concessions from us to make this happen! Who do you expect to pay for this, my fellow pilots and I at mainline?

Yogi
 
Like I said before the days of the teens flying our routes are going to come to an end or it will be the end of UAL.

the "teens" want you all to grow a pair and do the same as well. Why don't you think that? Us teens got into this industry to get to mainline and the only way that happens is if you reverse the wills of your fellow pilots of the past voting on weak scope for a pay increase thus leading to the current ********************ty situation where we're all stuck where we don't want to be.

man up and get it back. we'll all be happy then. I don't want to fly ORD-DFW anymore than you want me to.
 
Rez,

You still have not answered my question! Who will pay for your idea to happen? Management will surely want concessions from us to make this happen! Who do you expect to pay for this, my fellow pilots and I at mainline?

Yogi


Management will pay for it... not the ML pilot groups.. the RJs are too expensive. The Outsourcing is not safe... the right govt can be persuasive....

Now answer my question... what of the ALPA RJ pilots who lose thier job due to no fault, choice or action of their own...? As ALPA members we can't just put guys on the street...

Recall.. I am advocating that the RJ pilots must apply and pass the interview on thier own accord...
 
Management will pay for it... not the ML pilot groups.. the RJs are too expensive. The Outsourcing is not safe... the right govt can be persuasive....

Now answer my question... what of the ALPA RJ pilots who lose thier job due to no fault, choice or action of their own...? As ALPA members we can't just put guys on the street...

Recall.. I am advocating that the RJ pilots must apply and pass the interview on thier own accord...

Firstly, management will NEVER pay for that w/o wanting something in return. That is called, " use of negotiating capital". We at ML simply cannot/will not afford this.

Now to answer your question, when the flying comes back to ML, all pilots may apply, and hopefully we will have a fair first year payrate. Your not going to get a lot of empathy from ML pilots. We all endured risk, furlough, low first few year wages. I will certainly not vote for a contract that has low B-scales for first year pilots, but I highly doubt ML pilots will collectively agree to expend any negotiating capital to do so. Also I am not be so fast to say that ML pilots gave away the flying willfully, without threats of bankruptcy and the like. Also, I highly doubt that any junior pilots at ML voted to give any scope away, knowing that they would be furloughed. So , therefore, it was no fault of their own either, and I didn't see any regionals jump up and throw them a bone!!!

I'm done with this, and thanks for the debate!

Yogi
 
Rez,

You still have not answered my question! Who will pay for your idea to happen? Management will surely want concessions from us to make this happen! Who do you expect to pay for this, my fellow pilots and I at mainline?

Yogi

In an up year financially, you don't have to give as many concessions. And, were these airlines already on concessionary contracts? That means pay back time. Those UAL guys have taken it in the shorts since 9-11, and if the new UAL management wants an easy merger and not a USAIr style merger, they will agree to many of the demands.
 
You're not, simple fact. Go through the process of getting hired at a major and then you can talk. Until then, you're not only not in the same league, you're not in the same ballpark.



i agree------ not even close-- the difference b/w legacy and regional is night and day


SKIPPY

i'd rather be furloughed at a legacy than working at a regional
 
In an up year financially, you don't have to give as many concessions. And, were these airlines already on concessionary contracts? That means pay back time. Those UAL guys have taken it in the shorts since 9-11, and if the new UAL management wants an easy merger and not a USAIr style merger, they will agree to many of the demands.

Skippy,

Unfortunately I have some experience at this, you will always spend negotiating capital to get what rez is looking for. That is in the form of giving something to get something. So lets say a great contract is agreed to at the negotiating table, now lastly we throw in this proposal. Do you actually think mngmt will just say, "sure, no problem!" or do you think they would ask to slide back on something agreed to. Be realistic...

Yogi
 
Skippy,

Unfortunately I have some experience at this, you will always spend negotiating capital to get what rez is looking for. That is in the form of giving something to get something. So lets say a great contract is agreed to at the negotiating table, now lastly we throw in this proposal. Do you actually think mngmt will just say, "sure, no problem!" or do you think they would ask to slide back on something agreed to. Be realistic...

Yogi

The problem is, in a good year, they can't say "we can't afford it." That is the difference. If concessions were taken before during bad times, many of them will come back in better times. Good luck to you guys.
 
The problem is, in a good year, they can't say "we can't afford it." That is the difference. If concessions were taken before during bad times, many of them will come back in better times. Good luck to you guys.

I understand what you are saying, but call your negotiating committee, they will be happy to explain to you, that is not how collective negotiating/bargaining works. Read some negotiating books, you can also find it out that way. Management will never hand over anything without somehow taking it from somewhere else. They come to negotiations with a bottom line. They will not exceed that, unless there is a credible strike threat or leverage. Both are very difficult scenarios based on the size of the new UAL.

Yogi
 
I've been sitting on the sidelines for this so far, but i'm gonna chime in now that i've seen alot of mainline guys who've come from us lowly regional jet operators clearly forgetting where they came from. YOU GUYS GAVE US THESE JETS. We didn't undercut any of you to get them. We were on your list via the flow through.

Since I work for Express Jet, plz allow me to speak as an Express Jet pilot. CAL wholly-owned us, everything from seniority numbers, CCS access, coair, uniforms, training etc was done to their standards and, with few exceptions, their employees. The IAH chief pilot for us was a bloody CAL flow up with recall rights till 2k8.

There was a flow-up/flow-down agreement in place that worked until you guys pussied up and wouldn't renew it after we voted in alpa over that faggot ass IACP scab factory of a union and got a contract better, much better, than yours (see Contract 04 work rules). A second year FO at XJT made more per hr than a first yr CAL FO on the 757. You guys spun us off to pay for your bankruptcy, then your executives have driven us almost into the dirt. Be it Mr Peanut Head Kellner or that blue blood prick from the Ivy Leagues, Smisek. We didn't do a thing to ya'll but provide extremely good feed for your hubs. Then you had to bring in chataqua and then give Colgan 80000 seat turboprops....

Anyway, if you want the flying we do back, fine, take it with my blessing, but don't sit their on your Righteous Boeing Cloud and reign down judgements on us, more than 40 percent of the Cal list came from Express. We wanted to be one list but you guys thought you were too good to fly something made in Brazil. That's fine too, but don't act like the reason you're still operating under concessionary contracts since 02 is because of us. If you need a person to blame, you need only look in a mirror...or at your MEC.
That is the best summary of what has gone down the last 10 years that I have read. Absolutely correct. Mainline gave it all away. There was a chance to put everyone under one seniority list at a certain point and it was rejected, with prejudice. What a stupid thing to do. Now look at it. No movement on the list, backwards pay and benefits, and gonna be roasted on the SLI. They've been the junior partner in every negotiation and if they act the same way during the merger, they'll get roasted by UAL.
 
Management will pay for it... not the ML pilot groups.. the RJs are too expensive. The Outsourcing is not safe... the right govt can be persuasive....

Now answer my question... what of the ALPA RJ pilots who lose thier job due to no fault, choice or action of their own...? As ALPA members we can't just put guys on the street...

Recall.. I am advocating that the RJ pilots must apply and pass the interview on thier own accord...

I am on the street, I am(was) a dues paying member, I have applied at some alpa regionals and have gotten the, "I don't meet their qualifications" letter. If I get an interview and blow it, fine. But telling me I don't meet your qualifications. So if they end up on the street, "OH WELL" So much for alpa having my back.
 
Last edited:
Another thing to think about is the fact that ASA and XJT will be merging and will be about 4000 strong which will put them in group A in ALPA. With that status they will have a lot of power. I expect us (CAL/UAL) will maintain the CAL scope clause which will cause the ashes of the RJDC to rise like the Phoenix, please tell me I'm wrong JoeMerchant. Should this happen I would expect to see DAL and UAL to bail on ALPA and go independent and joining forces with USAPA and APA, an all legacy union. Heck, DAL is already rumbling about going independent. This takes the wind out of the sails for any DFR suit as we are no longer one union.

Joe, enjoy your hub turns out of ATL while I do my transcons and trans-oceanic flights with more days off than you, a better retirement plan, and making more at 5th year pay than an ASA Captain on 18 year pay. You have your flying via contract and as quickly as it came is as quickly as it will be taken away.
 
I understand what you are saying, but call your negotiating committee, they will be happy to explain to you, that is not how collective negotiating/bargaining works. Read some negotiating books, you can also find it out that way. Management will never hand over anything without somehow taking it from somewhere else. They come to negotiations with a bottom line. They will not exceed that, unless there is a credible strike threat or leverage. Both are very difficult scenarios based on the size of the new UAL.

Yogi


Yogi, you are having a hard time understanding Johnsonrod. UAL and CAL MECs have their companies in a corner right now. Big bonuses are at stake, for management and the people putting this merger together. They want it clean, and they are WALL ST. That means less negotiating, and more taking back. That is also called leverage. You need to look it up in negotiating books it seems. When one side has LEVERAGE, that side usually gets a lot more of what they want. The time is now.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 

Latest resources

Back
Top