Evansaero
Active member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2002
- Posts
- 34
Let's not call each other names. All I am saying is that the pilots and the mec should have been smarter then to put up a fight with repeated NOs. Yes and they should have worked out the deal later, Hulas knew he wasn't going to cut it with 50 seat pay on CRJ7s. Look at current contracts, no one flys 70 seaters for 50 seat pay. If you were a sweatshop owner in INDIA, would you care if your employees votes yes or no on a matter that would further increased your capital and the company?
No, the fact is that all the BS with alpa was a formality, Hulas was going to form it anyways either with the help of the pilots or with ought. A yes vote would have been better for the company as you can see what has happened the last few years and especially now.
Not only has GJ become what seems like a better operation but they have even got better pay and a contract. And are adding to their fleet.
Why did you come to TSA?
How would you know if gojet had a better ops?
Did you go over to gojet?