RIDETHELIGHTING
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2003
- Posts
- 702
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not true, Bill. Actually, the current delivery schedule shows 49 737NG aircraft being delivered prior to 2017. Only the last two aircraft are delivered in 2017.
This is the delivery schedule from the most recent 10Q, filed in April 2011.
TW
SW management knows exactly who has proposed what and when, how do you think that is?
I had already computed what my TFP would have been on a trip-by-trip basis
@ First year Pay? You know, Seniority, ie. years of service at Southwest has yet to be negotiated. This, along with pay rates on the 717. Everything is on the table and has to be negotiated.
Does ALPA want a say in any of this?
A negotiated settlement is the ONLY way ALPA has a say in any of this.
I don't know who you've been talking to, but you can't take our longevity. Period. Not unless we VOLUNTARILY give it up. That's a FACT of the RLA. NO airline merger/acquisition/arbitration has EVER given up longevity unless the pilots of one group voluntarily gave it up. The reason for that?@ First year Pay? You know, Seniority, ie. years of service at Southwest has yet to be negotiated. This, along with pay rates on the 717. Everything is on the table and has to be negotiated.
I don't know who you've been talking to, but you can't take our longevity. Period. Not unless we VOLUNTARILY give it up. That's a FACT of the RLA. NO airline merger/acquisition/arbitration has EVER given up longevity unless the pilots of one group voluntarily gave it up. The reason for that?
IT'S ILLEGAL TO FORCIBLY REMOVE SOMEONE'S RIGHTS UNDER A CBA. That includes their contractually-guaranteed longevity.
In addition, the MV letter recognizes Southwest as a "successor". Section 1 of our CBA requires any "successor" to honor our CBA in its entirety. That puts Southwest on the hook not to abrogate our longevity as well.
Sorry, Charlie. Don't know where you're getting your information, but it's dead wrong on the longevity issue. That question has been asked and answered by our legal staff, and I trust them over some kind of internal SWAPA rumor mill.
Pay rates on the 717 are a different matter.
Perhaps you should check with your legal staff and Negotiating Committee DIRECTLY before you go off on the longevity tangent again. I have.
So where would the DFR lawsuit draw the line in the sand?
If Southwest is paying a 737 CA the equivelant of 210/hr and SWAPA negotiates a 717 rate of 170/hr, or 150/hr, or 140/hr. Where is the line on filing a lawsuit? I'd say at best, that's a very grey area that would be hard to defend in a court of law.
Sounds like a great DFR lawsuit. I'm sure SWAPA is smarter than that.
*chuckle* Not interested in union work. Been there. Done that. Have that t-shirt (and a few other things from that fiasco).After reading what you, PCl and TY has to say I would recommend SWAPA take what you are offering. It seems like you guys do have all the leverage and it would be in SWAPA's best interest not to fight you. You seem to be one intelligent pilot and I think you will do good with SWAPA. Maybe even run for President. Good luck and congratulation on you win. I thought SWAPA was holding all the cards but I was wrong. Your $60,000 year raise will come in handy. The good thing arbitration will not consider that. However, unless there are fences and lower pay rates for the 717 and seat locks for many many years. I assume that is a possibility? Am I correct in that assumption?
Please explain. You are not SWAPA Pilots there is no duty to your group.
You were talking about longevity. SWAPA can't negotiate longevity for a craft and class of employees that they don't represent. Therefore, if they're reducing our longevity as you have suggested, then it's after they represent us, when they do have a DFR obligation. Like I said, they're smarter than that, even if you aren't.
You were talking about longevity. SWAPA can't negotiate longevity for a craft and class of employees that they don't represent. Therefore, if they're reducing our longevity as you have suggested, then it's after they represent us, when they do have a DFR obligation. Like I said, they're smarter than that, even if you aren't.