Nice try, Flop, but that's not what he said at all. In that letter, Bob is referring to UAL's stance on the issues. He's merely repeating what UAL has said, and then rebutting it. What Bob says is the following: "We are unaware of any restriction, limitation, or representation by the Houston Airport System or by the City of Houston to focus international services at IAH. Further, we are unaware of any restriction, limitation, or representation in any contractual agreement between the City and airlines serving Houston, nor in any bond ordinance that would lead one to conclude that Houston has any policy at all to focus international service at IAH."
All right pal, then why does there have to be a vote? Why does there have to be a decision by the city council? There most certainly is a policy change that has to take place. It's the SWA battlecry to act like rules don't affect you and agreements don't matter. You can delve into the "he said, she said" but the facts are staring you in the face. You have to sell it to the city council and they have to say yes. And you know what? They might not say yes. If that's the case, do you think you can make reference to the points you've made here and build it anyway? Nope. If they say no, you go packing....
These documents are sponsored by SWA. The United case is forthcoming....