Lear70
JAFFO
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2003
- Posts
- 7,487
Interesting theory.So it would seem that swapa will define "long term harm" as the lack of movement brought about by the swa decision to purchase airplanes with pilots included. To define harm, you would need to know the wants of each pilot and how those would have been satisfied by purchasing just 140 airplanes. To accurately model this, a timeline for a 140 airplane purchase would need to be developed. To accurately build this timeline, substantial input would be required from swa management. I am sure that all of this work was completed prior to the aquisition of AirTran Holdings inc. and in preparation for the merger of airtran airways and southwest airlines. Gary Kelly will have to allow that harm will be brought to the swa pilots unless the timeline of expectations can be materially met in the merger process....sounds like a phased" bump-and-flush " combined with all movement going to the swa seniority list as it existed the DOCC....if it goes down this way it will likely be the blueprint followed as the rest of the small airlines(hawaiian, jetblue, alaska etc)....get eaten
So to make sure I understand you, you're saying that if an agreement can't be reached and it goes to arbitration, SWA management would be called to testify of hits model and hope than an arbitrator agrees?
Or are you saying that GK will interject SWA management into the Process of negotiating/mediating/arbitrating and provide the above model with the expectation that the AAI MC abide by it, thus basically controlling the SLI? If so, what was the purpose of signing a Process Agreement at all?
Secondly, would GK not ALSO have to acknowledge the model for projected growth brought about by the same purchase and the resultant increase in projected career worth to the SWA pilots as a result?
Last edited: