Yeah, it would be a very interesting integration to say the least. Hence why many of us would just prefer to stay on our own.
Welcome to Flightinfo.com
- Register now and join the discussion
- Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
- Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
- Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
- Share the passion for aviation
- Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun
Southwest to buy AirTran...
- Thread starter easydoesit
- Start date
Welcome to Flightinfo.com
- Register now and join the discussion
- Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
- Invite your friends
- Share the passion of aviation
- Friendliest aviation community on the web
airlinepilot
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2002
- Posts
- 481
Well at least it would be a big QOL increase for all (reserve guys get 15 days off) and all the FO's would be making 6 figures ASAP. I don't think we will merge with anyone. I think Kelly is bargain shopping and looking for airlines in $$ trouble. But, everyone still says Air Tran is all the places we need to be. It will be an interesting year.
Not for me. I like flying standups and spending every single day at home. I somehow doubt that SWA would continue to allow some of us to fly 1-2 legs a day and block 30 hours a month for 70 hours of pay.
That's all well and good, but I'd prefer to get paid a little less and not have to work as much. Money isn't everything.
TV9Driver
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2005
- Posts
- 362
mdf,
AirTran has the East Coast locked up pretty good. We have alot of presence in New York (SWF, HPN, LGA, EWR) IAD, DCA, PHL, BOS and also all over Florida (RSW, SRQ, FLL, MIA, MCO, DAB, JAX, TPA, PBI) and alot of gate space at ATL.... Not to mention really good revenue out of IND, FNT, BMI, etc.....
I've been saying for a while that we are a really good buyout target. We make money, we're very low cost, we've got a great route structure, low debt ratio, and we don't own much. Plus our stock is south of $10/share...
AirTran has the East Coast locked up pretty good. We have alot of presence in New York (SWF, HPN, LGA, EWR) IAD, DCA, PHL, BOS and also all over Florida (RSW, SRQ, FLL, MIA, MCO, DAB, JAX, TPA, PBI) and alot of gate space at ATL.... Not to mention really good revenue out of IND, FNT, BMI, etc.....
I've been saying for a while that we are a really good buyout target. We make money, we're very low cost, we've got a great route structure, low debt ratio, and we don't own much. Plus our stock is south of $10/share...
I'll take that wager on 6-7 guys total. More than that were hired here. I helped several myself.
I don't care what you were told by AirTran. The odds of Chico existing long term after the deal would not have been good. AirTran tried regional feed didn't like it and got out of it. That is probably what would have happened in MDW as well.
CA Calypso
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2006
- Posts
- 77
LXAPilot,
This has nothing to do with "SWA People." I really don't mean this as callous as it probably sounds - but flying airplanes is a business. Airlines are in existence to make a profit - not to provide toys for pilots. They either grow or die. There will be winners and there will be losers.
It would be wonderfully altruistic to say that "we're all in this together" - but that is naive. Each airline and its respective pilot group will look after their own best interests - often at the expense of another group.
It would be wonderful if this was a true brotherhood - but it isn't.
You're right. As long as people think like you do that we're all in competition with one another, we'll never be a true brotherhood.
400A
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 26, 2003
- Posts
- 1,760
Giants, any beer not on the side of a race car,Chevy
cl65capt
Just say NO
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2003
- Posts
- 270
Patriots, Sam Adams and a Chrystler 300
yeah,but nobody here ever talked about stappling Midwest guys to the bottom of our list.
A SW guys that i know ,asked me if i heard of SW buying AT because he was tired of being an FO!!!
I told him to go FK himself
just stay away!!!!
That's right... It would mean faster upgrades for a good number of SWA F/Os wouldn't it? Hadn't given much thought to that side of the equation.
Not to wish anything on the AAI guys, but their group is much more junior than the LUV group.
Ok I guess I am an oddball but my resume includes all three airlines in question.
While being on the furloughed list at ATA I was offered a position at Airtran. With a family to feed I was not going to wait for the actual job loss, I left for Airtran. Since I resigned ATA I lost my right for a preferential interviw. In reality only a few got hired out of about 70 or so.
At Airtran I noticed quited a number of former ATA pilots coming over. So from what I saw first hand Airtran did initially hire more form ATA than SWA.
No here is the kicker, not very many, heck I can't think of one, actually liked working for Airtran. Once again not the pilot group here, just management and company culture. One former ATA pilot just flat out quit. And of course yours truly made it to SWA eventually.
So, you can argue who hired more but in the end it is nothing but a pot to piss in.
I really doubt we will see this happen, but if we do join forces I will be happy to see alot of the guys I flew with or hung out with at the Trannie.
Good luck to all of us.
Bigeasy
While being on the furloughed list at ATA I was offered a position at Airtran. With a family to feed I was not going to wait for the actual job loss, I left for Airtran. Since I resigned ATA I lost my right for a preferential interviw. In reality only a few got hired out of about 70 or so.
At Airtran I noticed quited a number of former ATA pilots coming over. So from what I saw first hand Airtran did initially hire more form ATA than SWA.
No here is the kicker, not very many, heck I can't think of one, actually liked working for Airtran. Once again not the pilot group here, just management and company culture. One former ATA pilot just flat out quit. And of course yours truly made it to SWA eventually.
So, you can argue who hired more but in the end it is nothing but a pot to piss in.
I really doubt we will see this happen, but if we do join forces I will be happy to see alot of the guys I flew with or hung out with at the Trannie.
Good luck to all of us.
Bigeasy
Hmmmm.....I wonder who that was.
atpcliff
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 4,260
Hi!
For all the guys that think SWA/AirTran won't happen:
It might not, but for sure SWA and CAL WILL merge with someone.
Both CEOs said that neither SWA or CAL WANT to merge, but if any other airlines merge, they will be FORCED to merge (I'm assuming becauase they would be to small to compete on their own.).
DAL/NWA will happen (my guess is 99% probability). If it doesn't, then some other merger will happen, which will trigger CAL/SWA to find merger partners.
The railroad industry had many more times the number of railroads in the US than the airline industry did, and now they're down to, basically, 4 giant railroads in the US, and only 5 in N. America. The airlines will follow.
I was wondering how an AirTran/Midwest/Frontier merger would work, and they could even add Alaska to that mix-it would be a pretty good route structure?
It will be a VERY interesting 6-12 months!!!
cliff
YIP
PS-I haven't applied at UAL, but, if they merge, I would apply with them immediately. I think the new management could do a lot with UAL-the current management has no plan, other than to merge.
For all the guys that think SWA/AirTran won't happen:
It might not, but for sure SWA and CAL WILL merge with someone.
Both CEOs said that neither SWA or CAL WANT to merge, but if any other airlines merge, they will be FORCED to merge (I'm assuming becauase they would be to small to compete on their own.).
DAL/NWA will happen (my guess is 99% probability). If it doesn't, then some other merger will happen, which will trigger CAL/SWA to find merger partners.
The railroad industry had many more times the number of railroads in the US than the airline industry did, and now they're down to, basically, 4 giant railroads in the US, and only 5 in N. America. The airlines will follow.
I was wondering how an AirTran/Midwest/Frontier merger would work, and they could even add Alaska to that mix-it would be a pretty good route structure?
It will be a VERY interesting 6-12 months!!!
cliff
YIP
PS-I haven't applied at UAL, but, if they merge, I would apply with them immediately. I think the new management could do a lot with UAL-the current management has no plan, other than to merge.
Lowrider717
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2006
- Posts
- 201
That's funny right thar. I've been saying that same thing for the past 5 years.
spitfire1500
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2005
- Posts
- 836
Last I checked neither has AirTran
Lear70
JAFFO
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2003
- Posts
- 7,487
We had an ATA pilot in my new-hire class. Nice guy, kept to himself, but you could tell he wasn't having a good time.
When he got recalled by ATA, he went... while stopping by the C.P.'s office to tell him what he thought about airTran.
I heard this directly from FP, couldn't believe my ears when he told me what the pilot had said. Not going to post the details, not really necessary, except to say that I didn't think it was anywhere near *that* bad...
Sure, management's trying to squeeze every last drop of blood they can from their employee groups these days, but it still beats the regional I came from.
Of course, I'm treated better these days flying charter than I was at any airline. They treat me like an adult, give me the keys to a jet with a $250,000 credit card and say "save as much money as you can but do the right thing for our clients" and I do. Problem is, of course, the money isn't there long-term...
Makes me kinda wish I had bailed for NJA before I had the termination on my record - can't get considered now...
Personally, I know the pilots would hate it initially, but merging with SWA and getting their management group in charge would, eventually, mean a much happier pilot group *IF* the management culture didn't change at SWA.
When he got recalled by ATA, he went... while stopping by the C.P.'s office to tell him what he thought about airTran.
I heard this directly from FP, couldn't believe my ears when he told me what the pilot had said. Not going to post the details, not really necessary, except to say that I didn't think it was anywhere near *that* bad...
Sure, management's trying to squeeze every last drop of blood they can from their employee groups these days, but it still beats the regional I came from.
Of course, I'm treated better these days flying charter than I was at any airline. They treat me like an adult, give me the keys to a jet with a $250,000 credit card and say "save as much money as you can but do the right thing for our clients" and I do. Problem is, of course, the money isn't there long-term...
Makes me kinda wish I had bailed for NJA before I had the termination on my record - can't get considered now...
Personally, I know the pilots would hate it initially, but merging with SWA and getting their management group in charge would, eventually, mean a much happier pilot group *IF* the management culture didn't change at SWA.
Last edited:
Flyboynfla
Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2002
- Posts
- 21
CA Calypso
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2006
- Posts
- 77
PCL 128,
I didn't say I was a proponent of this line of thought. I was just making an unemotional observation that fifteen years in this industry has afforded me.
Airlines are competitors. Therefore when you work for a different airline - you work for the competition. Do you honestly think that one group of pilots would sacrifice themselves for another? Do you think the Ford auto workers would throw themselves on their sword for the benefit of GM autoworkers?
Is anything I said untrue?
Last edited:
It's not a matter of throwing themselves on their swords for another group. The problem is that many pilots are actively hostile towards pilots from other airlines. Pilots from other airlines work for the competition, but they aren't themselves the competition. Pilots from different groups should try to work together to develop strategies that benefit the entire profession rather than salivating over the thought of events that could cripple the careers of pilots from a competing carrier.
CA Calypso
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2006
- Posts
- 77
RedDogC130
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2005
- Posts
- 1,329
I get it so the Patriots are practicing with the Giants in hopes that they learn how to play the game better next season. trading plays and the Patriots want to give the best players to the Giants to give them an even edge... Not sure if that really made sense but oh well..
I do disagree about the competition part of the topic with regards to pilot v. pilot a little. I would never be rude or mean to another pilot from another airline, in fact I take pride in seeing if they need help woth anything if I have the power to do so. I never want to see someone lose a job but if it means that I keep mine and their company goes out of business and mine survives...hope you have money saved. Why would I sacrifice my company to save another...that does not make much sense. Business is competition...to make money off the other guy. I am shocked you don't get that. Just like when we gain experience and flight time, I want my resume better looking than the next guy in hopes that that takes me over the top to get the job. I didn't get my Masters degree because I like to go to school, I got it because it would look good on my resume...I hate to admit I did learn some good stuff though.
Lear70
JAFFO
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2003
- Posts
- 7,487
And that's one of the reasons this job will never again be what it was.
There is a *reason* all the ALPA MEC's get together to discuss things, including negotiating strategies.
There is a *reason* that non-ALPA airlines get together to try to influence the votes in Washington when it affects us.
There is a *reason* that "pattern-based bargaining" is used by just about everyone, including SWAPA and the NPA among others.
We can either work TOGETHER to accomplish our goals or we will all certainly suffer separately. Just because your airline has been on a roll for a decade and now has the highest narrow-body paid pilots in the world (and better than many airlines' SWB's), doesn't mean it will always be that way.
Competition is healthy, certainly. However, management at most Legacies as well as the LCC's have learned that co-existence is the key to survival. Maybe there's a lesson for you in there, too.
I hate to say it, but since the Pandora's box of deregulation can never be shut again, perhaps competing on SERVICE and letting the customer pick, rather than believing it's a competition between PILOTS, might get us farther towards our collective goals and make ALL of us profitable without having to sacrifice another airline and the hundreds of thousands of lives that go along with it.
Just a thought.
CA Calypso
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2006
- Posts
- 77
I agree that pilot groups should work together and I think to the greatest extent possible they have.
However, I don't think that management thinks co-existence is the key except in a few certain circumstances. Delta and AirTran in Atlanta, United and Frontier in Denver, etc. The smaller carriers' existence in those cities keeps out another large hubbed carrier. Other than that, when a carrier is knocked out of business it creates opportunities for other carriers - either through growth or increased margins. Hence the move toward consolidation - we are moving to fewer mega carriers rather than peacefully co-existing together.
And the customer has been picking the winners - but not on service but on price. Unfortunately, air service has become just another commodity.
Share this page
Latest resources
-
-
-
-
-
AC 90-89C - Amateur-Built Aircraft and Ultralight Flight Testing HandbookAmateur-Built Aircraft and Ultralight Flight Testing Handbook
- Neal
- Updated:
