Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Southwest off the runway in Spokane..

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
As I thought about this incident, I ask the question: Where in training have you got to taxi or land on a snow covered runway?

I grew up in the North East so I know in snow, control inputs do not necessarily mean the desired returns.

I even was told of a LA captain who overshot a snow covered taxiway when the plane kept going straight when the wheel is turned. Fortunately a fresh snow covered the marks where he went in to the grass.

It can feasibly happen if someone grows up in -let's say Florida, does flight training in Florida, and someday have to land in a snow covered runway, never being in snow before.
 
It can feasibly happen if someone grows up in -let's say Florida, does flight training in Florida, and someday have to land in a snow covered runway, never being in snow before.


My guess is that this captain has landed on snow before. Nothing new for him/her.
 
Hey, there nothing wrong with having your priorities in order. ;)

Glad everyone's OK.

Getting to the bar quicker?
I know I think the rest of us are forgetting what it means to be a pilot!!! They should have cold bears waiting for us in our rooms when we get there.
 
Since SWA has been in business there has unfortunately been one fatality as a result of an accident. (MDW)

In that same time frame just to name a few:

AA (LIT) 1999 Flt# 1420 NTSB names pilot error resulting in 11 fatalities landing in a thunderstorm.

DAL (DFW) 1985 Flt# 1141 NTSB names pilot error resulting in 14 fatalities for failure to ensure flaps/ slats were in takeoff position.

NWA (DTW) 1987 Flt# 255 NTSB names pilot error resulting in 156 fatalities for failure to position flaps to take off configuration.

And, of course, there are too many more.

But you will never hear me say it's no surprise that this happened to AA,DAL, and NWA because I've seen the way they fly or heard from a friend there about ther operations.
So an airplane slid off the taxiway in poor conditions. BFD.
If you really think SWA guys are a bunch of reckless cowboys (which is wrong) you would still have to admit the safety record at SWA speaks for itself.
 
Since SWA has been in business there has unfortunately been one fatality as a result of an accident. (MDW)

In that same time frame just to name a few:

AA (LIT) 1999 Flt# 1420 NTSB names pilot error resulting in 11 fatalities landing in a thunderstorm.

DAL (DFW) 1985 Flt# 1141 NTSB names pilot error resulting in 14 fatalities for failure to ensure flaps/ slats were in takeoff position.

NWA (DTW) 1987 Flt# 255 NTSB names pilot error resulting in 156 fatalities for failure to position flaps to take off configuration.

And, of course, there are too many more.

But you will never hear me say it's no surprise that this happened to AA,DAL, and NWA because I've seen the way they fly or heard from a friend there about ther operations.
So an airplane slid off the taxiway in poor conditions. BFD.
If you really think SWA guys are a bunch of reckless cowboys (which is wrong) you would still have to admit the safety record at SWA speaks for itself.

This isn't a slam on SW, but saying they only killed one person doesn't really present the whole picture. The Burbank and Midway accidents could just as easily have resulting in many more fatalities. Now one could argue that AA and others have had similar accidents with small or no loss of life, in addition to other worse accidents. In my view, the accident rate in this country is so low that it is difficult to draw any valid statistical conclusions (the number of accidents is less than the standard deviation).
 
This Lawyer in the story wasn't as nice to the SWA crew as others. Of course, he is a Lawyer.
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Southwest Airlines 737 Skids on Snow at Washington's Spokane International Airport[/FONT]



2008-01-29 00:11:31 - Contact: Karen Bertoli, Public Affairs Director, Kreindler & Kreindler LLP [email protected] 312.399.7878

For Immediate Release:
Southwest Safety Incident Not the First Time
Southwest Airlines 737 Skids on Snow at Washington's Spokane International Airport


New York, NY January 28, 2008 . . .Southwest Airlines Flight 485 slides off a snow covered taxiway after landing at Washington's Spokane International Airport (GEG) Sunday afternoon. The
737, inbound from Portland, Oregon, was taxiing to the gate at around 1:40 pm when the plane's nosegear departed the snow-covered taxiway. The passengers and crew were fortunate not to be seriously injured. Southwest flight crews have a history of undertaking similarly risky aircraft operations.

'This is at least the fourth instance where a Southwest jet has overrun a runway or ran off a taxiway in just the past few years. It continues to raise serious safety concerns about Southwest's operations and culture,- says Dan Rose, partner at Kreindler & Kreindler LLP who has and is currently handling cases stemming from two separate Southwest Airlines runway overrun incidents.

One overrun occurred on Dec. 8, 2005 when Southwest Airlines Flight 1248 was landing in a snowstorm at Midway Airport and skidded off the runway killing Joshua Woods, 6, in front of his family. Similar weather conditions to the ones in Spokane prevailed at time of this incident.


Hey y'all, it's THESE GUYS who are the enemy. Not SWA or AA or DAL or LCC's or legacies.
 
was the CA over 60?

Cuz' this might be one of the first of an eventual many instances where the slower reaction times and more susceptibility to stress and fatigue make many question why this country decided to screw over the majority of the pilot population by passing age 65

If the outcome of the investigation is based on emotion ( like the above statement) instead of facts...then maybe...just maybe.

I think I am now begining to understand why the vote on this issue was 390-0 in the House and passed with unanimous consent in the Senate.
 
Last edited:
Texas-Jet-

You quote the vote in congress as relevant? Do you always show so much respect for congress' opinion on flying matters?

I agree with your post but those pushing for the rule change cherry-picked statistical data to support their cause (just like everyone does). It's interesting to me that noone is allowed to even question wether age is ever a factor in anything. Senior guys argue vehemently that 100% of pilots will be just as sharp at 65. My dad certainly thinks his driving skills are still fine even though he almost rear-ends everyone he follows. And what I see out on the line with regards to our "most experienced" pilots in terms of approaches, landings, CRM, and the ability to stay awake doesn't jive with the rhetoric. But I guess I am not allowed to bring that up.

But I completely agree it's bad form to jump to conclusions before knowing the facts. It's not fair to that crew or anyone.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top