duck_killer
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2006
- Posts
- 119
Translation: "F-ck the profession, what's in it for me?"![]()
Coming from the guy that paid to be a first officer. Good one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Translation: "F-ck the profession, what's in it for me?"![]()
Unfortunately, the group isnt taking the job...it was given by mainline...seems as though the mainline folks have tunnel vision of only flying the "big" stuff and not trying to make a business model work...If the company wants to fly smaller birds...the mainline guys should...to keep the power of a pilot group....but "its not worth it to them".....
I was in a jumpseat...and that was the impression given to me.....basically, they have no clue at mainline of whats going on at the regional level, or how the regionals got this way....in my eyes, they are to stubborn and blind to a big picture....so they blame the regionals for taking "their" flying when it seems its them as a pilot group(their MEC) gave it away.....
I hope they wake up and stop trying to stop it by scope...but do the flying themselves...after all they have plenty on furlough that are very capable.
The PID could have been approved without the companies being merged....You know that...ALPA merger policy does not require the companies being merged....You can have a single list with seperate certificates...and you know it....Just another excuse....
You changed union reps..That is easier than flat out decertification....
You will see a change of unions here at ASA....Decertification is tougher than changing unions...Do some research...
Actually, this group has nothing to do with me....They are taking the ball and running with it on their own....I have no connection.....
Would it be all right if mainline took their scope back? If they did I think regional pilots should have solid protections.... or opportunities... but if mainline gave it away... is it fair to get it back?
And this arguement about regionals and legacy both represented by ALPA as a conflict..... would it be better if the regionals were not? Would not being in the same union create more unity and harmonious relations between the labor groups?
Yes, I think the regionals should have there own union "RALPA" or something...I dont like the conflict of interest there. Thats just me though.
Babbitt, the FAA Admin, this week addressed ALPA's Safety seminar. Skywest pilots could've been there..... they choose not to.....
SAPA was too busy chillin with Jerry on his housboat.
I'm glad our founding fathers didn't have the attitude you have.If its worth doing, its going to take a lot of hard work for a long time to start to see change. I think we are starting to see the hints of change already. And don't make such a big deal about my inexperience. I'm on your side on this. We just disagree on how and who can fix it.
Nevets said:I feel that its our whole profession's job to fix this regardless of who's fault it was to begin with. We wont get anywhere if we continue to just look to put blame on someone. Its done and I think that its behind us, as far as those who were to "blame."
Nevets said:That is how I'm trying to "sell" ALPA. We need to bring everyone together, whether it be ALPA, APA, etc (I just happen to be ALPA but I would feel the same if I was a member of another pilot union) so that we can continue to fix this. How can Skywest, jetBlue, Allegiant, and even RAH pilots since they aren't even part of CAPA, do ANYTHING without having a voice? That was the point of my comment.
Nevets said:Depends on where that pilot would fall in an integrated seniority list.
Would it be all right if mainline took their scope back? If they did I think regional pilots should have solid protections.... or opportunities... but if mainline gave it away... is it fair to get it back?
No regional MEC is told what to do by mainline MECs. If mainline MECs are able to scope back their flying, good for them. We should all support that regardless of whether you work for a regional or mainline.
I'm not sure we are on the same side.
You shouldn't have to "sell" ALPA...it should sell itself. I will say, you do better than you cohorts (Rez, PCL128, and waveflyer)...
Regionals are told what to do by ALPA national....I know because I have seen it first hand. Some tell ALPA national to pound sand....and some fold a cheap lawn chair.
Why should I support mainline in taking the flying back as a regional "lifer"? Keep in mind that depending on the regional, 35-40% plan on staying....What's in it for them?
I'm certain we're not.
Actually, I've been quite successful at "selling" ALPA, Joey. It pretty much does sell itself.
ALPA International doesn't tell anyone what to do. Suggestions are made by staff, and you either take them or ignore them. I've done both. They never seem to take it too personally when I tell them "thanks for the advice, but I'm going to do this other thing instead."
What's in it for you is a mainline number with a radically improved quality of life and much better career expectations.
I'm certain we're not.
PCL_128 said:Actually, I've been quite successful at "selling" ALPA, Joey. It pretty much does sell itself.
PCL_128 said:What's in it for you is a mainline number with a radically improved quality of life and much better career expectations.
And a superior chance of being furloughed. No thank you. Thanks for playing Commie, now go home. Joe at least looks out for me, and for that reason I like his views. Yours? Not so much. Bye.
Trojan
I am sceptical of Nevets....but I know for a fact that you and I aren't on the same side. You could learn something from him. He is an ALPA cheerleader like you, minus the hypocracy and arrogance...Try it....
Yes you have. You have convinced the Air Tran pilots that life will be much better with ALPA.
My quality of life couldn't get better.
Any deal that allows a mainline pilot to take that from me will be met with resistance...and not just by me!
Rez, I work as an ALPA jumpseat volunteer. I don't think you really want to go there. The United side has been very unfair to everyone, especially the UEX pilots. There is a real disconnect and this doesn't address it. You are making ALPA look bad. Please stop!
I am not talking about the UAL/UAX issue....
This is a new benefit for jumpseating.... Will Skywest pilots want the benefits? They do have a jumpseat committee and perhaps they were part of the process that brought this about.....
I work with the Skywest jumpseat committee and they are professionals despite your attacks on them. They understand the value and work very hard to protect it. Here at ASA, we do to. This has nothing to do with ALPA, so please keep your agenda out of it. ALPA is on thin ice here at ASA, and you aren't helping.
They want the same things that you and I want. They aren't the devil you make them out to be. The problem we are having at ASA and Skywest is the mainline partner. They are both ALPA.
I don't doubt you.... but it is bigger than jumpseating issues.....
ALPA might be on thin ice at ASA.... and that is just the way Jerry and the RAA like it....
What does UALPA and DALPA have to do with the mainline corporation?
I'm sorry Rez, but I don't understand your post. What do you want to see?
The OO pilots pulling on the same rope as the rest of us.... instead of riding in the back, consuming resources and being disrespectful..... as I said this goes far beyond jumpseat privileges....
As an ASA ALPA volunteer, I can assure you that the Skywest pilots are pulling on the same rope. It is some ALPA carriers that are pulling against us at ASA. Mesa hurt us. Compass hurt us. The Skywest pilots are not "disrespectful" to me. How are they to you? Are the Mesa pilots "disrespectful" to you?
Our downward pressure isn't coming from our Skywest brothers. You are barking up the wrong tree and trying to pick a fight that isn't there. Do yourself and ALPA a failure. Please stop.
How are they pulling on the same rope?
Rez O. Lewshun said:Did ALPA create the company MESA? or Compass?
Why would the OO pilots disrespect you? There are good guys at OO. But the issue is national and global.... not exclusive to the jumpseat world...
Rez O. Lewshun said:Of course it is... OO management knows a good deal when they see it... having the OO pilots non union is less resistence. They like it so much that they are working on getting the ASA pilots to reject ALPA.. either legally or "spiritually'. Union representation is about access to govt. As long managment has access to govt and OO pilots do not.. managment is happy...
...Look at it this way... when the ALPA Pres, whoever s/he is, goes before Congress and says I represent 50,000 plus airline pilots.. it gets noticed. what he needs to be saying is.. I represent 100% of the Air Line Pilots in the US. Recall the APA pilots and the B scale... those senior clowns needed levegage and they sold out the next gen. Regardless of why the APA left ALPA, leaving ALPA was bad for all of us..
If the President of the USA went to the United Nations or G8 or another international representation event and said "I represent 42 of the 50 United States...." How would that sit with you? Consider a land locked state like Kansas or OK who removed it self from the federal level but stayed connected to the 50 states economically. They stopped paying into the federal budget, including the defense budget because they knew their defense was most assured. As a tax payer would that concern you?
....
2. My attitude is based on the fact that I am looking out for what is best for ASA....not what is best for you, mainline pilots, or the "profession". I think that any solution now will have "collatoral damage" including many regional pilots.
3. I'm not sure we are on the same side.
It's my job to do what is best for me...that's what most people are going to do...Any solution that doesn't keep that in mind is doomed to fail...As far as "blame" and getting over the past...you know the saying...Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it....I don't think we have learned from history yet....
You shouldn't have to "sell" ALPA...it should sell itself. I will say, you do better than you cohorts (Rez, PCL128, and waveflyer)...There constant attacks on those who disagree, and especially the Skywest pilots, makes it harder to take ALPA seriously.
See, now you have lost any support from about 30-40% of regional pilots....Any deal that puts a single mainline pilot senior to a regional pilot on the aircraft we fly, is a deal breaker. You may not agree with that, but that is simply a fact.
Regionals are told what to do by ALPA national....I know because I have seen it first hand. Some tell ALPA national to pound sand....and some fold a cheap lawn chair.
Why should I support mainline in taking the flying back as a regional "lifer"? Keep in mind that depending on the regional, 35-40% plan on staying....What's in it for them?
And a superior chance of being furloughed. No thank you. Thanks for playing Commie, now go home. Joe at least looks out for me, and for that reason I like his views. Yours? Not so much. Bye.
Trojan
They want the same things that you and I want.
As an ASA ALPA volunteer, I can assure you that the Skywest pilots are pulling on the same rope. It is some ALPA carriers that are pulling against us at ASA. Mesa hurt us. Compass hurt us. The Skywest pilots are not "disrespectful" to me. How are they to you? Are the Mesa pilots "disrespectful" to you?
Our downward pressure isn't coming from our Skywest brothers. You are barking up the wrong tree and trying to pick a fight that isn't there. Do yourself and ALPA a failure. Please stop.
ALPA represents Mesa, and it puts downward pressure on ASA. ALPA created Compass, and it puts downward pressure on ASA.
The Skywest pilots aren't working on getting ASA pilots to reject ALPA. The movement is coming from ASA pilots who were ALPA reps. Former MEC members, and MEC officers are advocating dumping ALPA. Why is that? It isn't coming from Skywest pilots.
How does he do that? You like his views because they appeal to a sense of bravado.... but it is all talk... better yet... please explain what his views have done for you and how his views "looks out for me"