CA1900
Big Member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2002
- Posts
- 5,436
Now your statement is still half true, because demand for ethanol has risen greatly. But answer this. Would you rather pay the American farmer for his ethanol or the Venezuelan/Arabian/Russian/Chinese oil tycoon?
Now that's the half-truth. The process of creating ethanol burns more fossil fuels than the energy yield of the ethanol. You're paying the oil tycoon anyway. Ethanol as a "source of energy" is a complete sham, consuming billions of dollars of taxpayer money and wasting even more oil than if we'd burned it directly in our cars. In the process, we're driving up food costs even further.
Want a solution to the energy problem? Electric or plug-in hybrid cars, and a lot more nuclear reactors. And yes, I'd gladly have one in my backyard.