B-J-J Fighter
Royce Gracie in Action
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2001
- Posts
- 1,118
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
B-J-J Fighter said:Will PSA have to hire quite a bit if they get the 900'S?
Crzipilot said:All of these holy then thou types are kinda funny....... How's that mountain top your sitting on???
Until then, the rest of you, whom prob. have equal or less W2's, butt out.
ImbracableCrunk said:Yeah, butt out. It's not like anything that one pilot group does has an effect on another. OH WAIT - YES IT DOES! The RAA is drooling at comments like yours.
As everyone has pointed out in other threads on other topics and such. Straight pay rate isn't all that matters.
Crzipilot said:And to clarify something, It's not 50 seat rates, it's a ratio'd rate. The sr. guys did screw the Jr. F/o's last time around. But the current rates and soon to be rates are higher than mesa, which combined with work rules = higher W2 then them, and when looked at, in the ballpark of other regionals. Whatever decision that's made is made, for whatever variety of reasons.
Mesa's 900 Pay http://www.airlinepilotcentral.com/a...-lcc/mesa.html
PSA 900 Soon to be Rate http://www.airlinepilotcentral.com/a...ional/psa.html
I see that MESA has a higher hourly rate! Vote NO!!!!
Jpilot23 said:I *want* to be employed.
They hinted in the announcement meeting toward 150 for the first 20.
IF it passes good luck!
PSACPSP
Victor Meldrew said:Are shinny jet syndrome, fly a jet for whatever you are offered with no regards to the effect it has on everyone else. This is why this industry is f#cked with the likes of you. Not everyone lives at home with mommy and has no bills to pay.
ex j-41 said:Do we have any assurances that the 200's won't disappear IF we accept the 900's?
I would hate to see some poor new hire get furloughed after IOE!
On another note: 900's are bad for pilot job security. You can haul more people less frequently. Meaning less pilot jobs and reduced hours for those flying. For every 2 900's on property, we could lose 3 200's, and still carry the same amount of people. 33% of pilots could lose their jobs if we vote yes. All the more reason to just say NO!