180ToTheMarker
12 months of October
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2003
- Posts
- 658
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
crashpad said:I thought the rates looked respectable for a feeder.
crashpad said:I thought the rates looked respectable for a feeder.
Rogue5 said:SkyWest just did as well...
80% participation: 71% No, 29% Yes.
meatwallet said:of course you did, cause that's what, like $0.20 raise?
80% voted (out of 2000+), and a third said yes! Simply disgusting.
Ok,JI Gone OH said:They agreed to fly 70 seaters for 50 seat rates though, didn't they?
bvt1151 said:I have to agree the Skywest is to blame for the mixed pay rates. They are the only airline offering all aircraft on the same scale, and Fred has undoubtedly used them as an example.
Exactly how low the pay actually is, is Delta's fault [bankruptcy].
bvt1151 said:I have to agree the Skywest is to blame for the mixed pay rates. They are the only airline offering all aircraft on the same scale, and Fred has undoubtedly used them as an example.
Exactly how low the pay actually is, is Delta's fault [bankruptcy].
JI Gone OH said:Now there's a great idea.... I don't think we get a vote in Chapter 11! Why are we the only one's that are supposed to say no, anyway? Why has everyone else caved since 2001? (and don't give me the 9/11 excuse).
wilde737 said:Sorry guys that sucks to hear! I do have a question though. How is flying a 70/50 seat crj for the same wage, any different than flying a 757-200/757-300 for the same wage. It seems to me that it has been going on far too long to be blaming SkyWest. I am relatively new to the industry, so I'm sorry if I offend anyone.
Wilde737