Can you explain how these two sentences aren't contradictory?
Yes...but thankfully, I don't have too. Everybody but you understands them.
Whether those CL-65-900s go to Mesaba or not depends on Mesaba taking the flow through - yes?
No. As I've posted...
no. NO, nein, nyet, non, no, no, no, no.
Got it?
If Mesaba rejects the flow thru...the flow thru dies. At that point, the Northwest MEC must decide whether or not the remaining elements of the deal are "go" or "no go".
ALPA is therefore whipsawing Mesaba pilots with airframes to get furlough protection for the mainliners.
Nice try! The flow thru was negotiated over a year ago as part of the Compass arrangement. If your "
furlough protection" motive was accurate, then it was done 14-months ago...and not required as part of this Mesaba deal.
The point is that those Eagle pilots at Northwest and Comair aren't at American and they're not waiting to flow to American.
Wait! You're telling me
Eagle pilots had a
choice? They were given
options?
The
horror!
How cruel of ALPA to be a party to an agreement that provided affiliated pilots a potential career pipeline!
Back in the day when Eagle and Continental Express both had flow through agreements, their attrition rates were greater than that of Comair. If flow through is the career advancement vehicle you want us to believe it is, how do you account for that?
"
the career advancement vehicle"? Who said that? It's an option. A choice. An opportunity.
If you'll guarantee the future of the industry for the next several years and I'll give a value for it. Since you can't do that, I think it was a good idea for the Northwest MEC to insist on the option for Mesaba pilots.
From my understanding of the language, Mesaba pilots will not be kidnapped and pressed into service at the mainline as part of the flow thru. They'll actually have the option to decline and seek employment at Comair.
Turning junior pilots at another airline into your furlough fodder by witholding flying if they don't acquiesce has no place in a union. In other words, when mainline MECs conspire with management and start deriving a perceived benefit from alter egos, it's over - the union is mortally wounded.
Spare me! Your fundamental premise is wrong, hence your entire thesis.
Nobody is our "
furlough fodder". Rejection of the flow thru doesn't preclude new jets at Mesaba. You're clueless.
All three of those statements are accurate and correct.